Careful, you'll be accused of being a Trump supporter or apologist for making that point. That's the joy of GAF now. You can't make a point about the significance of one issue without overzealous posters assuming that you're somehow a Trump fan/voter/MAGA drone.
Yes, special forces conduct a ton of raids each year (over a thousand), but it's true that this one is larger than most. After the fact it's fairly easy to say that this one was significant in terms of the SEAL being killed, many civilians being killed, and a young child being killed, but I don't think any of us know how significant it was expected to be ahead of time. It's also not clear how often presidents sit in the situation room. We know that President Obama and Secretary Clinton were there (along with many others) during the Bin Laden raid, but it doesn't sound like the military personnel really want that anyway:
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/01/the-bin-laden-situation-room-revisited-one-year-later/
I personally suspect that if it was meant to be incredibly important then they wouldn't have used V-22s as those are not really ideal for landing in the desert (they don't handle dust all that well and have had several notable crashes because of it). In the Bin Laden raid, for example, they used special helicopters that were completely classified, which is quite different from using widely known ones that are prone to issues.
The question of whether this mission was approved without due consideration and legal due diligence is important. Whether or not Trump sat in the room to watch a Predator feed of the raid on TV in real time seems to me to be a side show.
I'm sure with this post I'll again be accused of being pro-Trump by someone more focused on politics than discussion. Once again, to try to preempt the zealots I hate Trump and hate so many things that he has done since 1/20.