I think it's just art and not representative of who the Sorceress really is. Would've been a cool easter egg if she actually were a wretched crone though.
Ho ho! I can see you have a grasp of logic, but it's important to also apply what's called 'the principle of charity' when you're assessing an argument. You can look it up, and then just mentally rewrite the first quote into the second, where it's still valid. A little hyperbole doesn't change an argument completely, especially when the intention is very clear (seeing as it was stated twice before).
But there's nothing stopping you from pretending that's her official backstory, riiiiight?
This looks like a potential cleric character for a sequel or dlc to me
As a nun character, the sexuality contrasts the chastity belt.
That actually is a really nice review. Good job!I'm not a professional reviewer ( I do it as a hobby), but if you think my review is good, then feel free to add it to the list.
http://darkzero.co.uk/game-reviews/dragons-crown-ps3/
I'm not a professional reviewer ( I do it as a hobby), but if you think my review is good, then feel free to add it to the list.
http://darkzero.co.uk/game-reviews/dragons-crown-ps3/
This looks like a potential cleric character for a sequel or dlc to me
That's a more complicated discussion that has locked at least two, possibly three threads.
I think the whole reason I'm not shocked by the racy stuff in Dragon's Crown is because I've played Atlus games before.
This looks like a potential cleric character for a sequel or dlc to me
My local gamestop is like that for all niche releases, doesn't surprise me that a vita release makes that even smaller.
I'll probably end up doing that. ;-)
I think we need to clarify something here, because I honestly don't remember making reference to something as complicated as 'priorizing PC if one has all the platforms available to them to play any Japanese game at their leisure'. We need to go back to "Why not? I know its a Japanese dev but PC folks would like to give them money." Now, when I read PC folk, I read people who are primarily, or solely PC gamers (in this case probably solely, since it doesn't seem like they'd want to give them money otherwise). I think that's a fair interpretation (let me know if it's a strawman!), which leads to "I have no idea why anyone interested in Japanese games would make PC their primary platform." I probably should've been specific and added 'to consume Japanese games', and maybe you would've been okay with that, but it's too late. Keeping that in mind though I'll reframe and say it's perfectly fine to prioritize the PC platform... if you're not interested in playing very many Japanese games on it. Like I mentioned earlier, you'll have a couple Falcom games, and a dozen action games like Dark Souls and DmC. So don't port beg, because if you're interested in Japanese games you should already have a console to play them on. That sound reasonable?The intention IS clear, you're making a strawman out of something nobody said, so that you could make an argument that can't be made out of the original parameters. Principle of charity doesn't apply here at all, particularly when the intention is not just transparent, it's also a requirement for your argument to stand. I use "argument" loosely because it amounted to "doing this would be ridiculous, because it would not make sense". Which, granted, is good enough when you fabricate ridiculous statements that nobody said in the first place.
Metadiscussion aside, you've still failed to argument what exactly is the problem with priorizing PC if one has all the platforms available to them to play any Japanese game at their leisure, especially when a larger and larger percentage of Japanese games are ported to the PC as well anyway. Can you stick to that and give me any reason at all?
