More people need to watch Oblivion but I would call Jack Reacher a generic action flick, though.[/b]
It's great, but everybody thought it was just another generic action movie until they saw it on home video or HBO, just like Jack Reacher and Oblivion.
not the idea of the universe at all.
I disagree. Well done CUs have a recognizable endgame. Bringing the Superheroes together finish the storyline, let the two big monster finally fight.
Nobody has even a idea what the endgame here could be.
I disagree. Well done CUs have a recognizable endgame. Bringing the Superheroes together finish the storyline, let the two big monster finally fight.
Nobody has even a idea what the endgame here could be.
Yeah, and I like to get pong even when I can get something like The Last of Us. It was the Proto-CU, still nobody gave overall a shit, even when they kinda started it all.All of the "cinematic universes" I can think of off the top of my head
The old universal one (monsters appear together and either fight, team up, or both in different combinations)
No Cinematic Universe, the Vs Movies arent even canon.[Aliens vs Predator (the monsters fight)
You are aware of all the Infinity Gautlet stuff and are overlooking it.[Marvel (they team up, while occasionally fighting for contrived reasons)
Same as with the Dark Verse, one of the biggest complaints is that they are throwing all at the wand and act to quickly. But from the thematic, you can see that its going to be similar to Marvel.[DC (they team up, while occasionally fighting for contrived reasons)
[In regards of the old ones: Look at my Universal Argument.Those weird arse Kaiju mashups including the new one they're trying to do (the monsters fight, and if they're good guy monsters sometimes they team up)
Kinda expected this! But I also like a good reason why everyone comes together fighting. Even when its a movie with Godzilal Vs Mr FreezeSpoilers, the end game is the monsters teaming up to fight other monsters, while occasionally fighting each other for contrived reasons. Shared universes and monster mashes are the cinematic equivalent of a kid having all his toys duke it out even though it doesn't make sense that godzilla is fighting mr freeze.
so I guess you're disappointed 🤔Went for Cruise missile.
Wasnot disappointed.not
All of the "cinematic universes" I can think of off the top of my head
- The old universal one (monsters appear together and either fight, team up, or both in different combinations)
- Aliens vs Predator (the monsters fight)
- Marvel (they team up, while occasionally fighting for contrived reasons)
- DC (they team up, while occasionally fighting for contrived reasons)
- Those weird arse Kaiju mashups including the new one they're trying to do (the monsters fight, and if they're good guy monsters sometimes they team up)
Spoilers, the end game is the monsters teaming up to fight other monsters, while occasionally fighting each other for contrived reasons. Shared universes and monster mashes are the cinematic equivalent of a kid having all his toys duke it out even though it doesn't make sense that godzilla is fighting mr freeze.
Marvel & DC universes actually make sense though.
"We hired this crazy chick with a baseball bat to stop Superman."
...
"What do you say, she was knocked out cold by Batman?"
Boiling the MCU down to "they team up, and sometimes fight" misses the entire reasons why that cinematic universe works and every other one has failed. It's more than just teams-up and fights, more than just the big Avengers money shot. Every other company thinks that the key is to rush to that money shot, that's why you got them teasing their entire line-up and cast and movie list before the first movie comes out. "Hey, remember how cool it was to see the Avengers together, well we're doing the same thing, aren't you excited"All of the "cinematic universes" I can think of off the top of my head
- The old universal one (monsters appear together and either fight, team up, or both in different combinations)
- Aliens vs Predator (the monsters fight)
- Marvel (they team up, while occasionally fighting for contrived reasons)
- DC (they team up, while occasionally fighting for contrived reasons)
- Those weird arse Kaiju mashups including the new one they're trying to do (the monsters fight, and if they're good guy monsters sometimes they team up)
Spoilers, the end game is the monsters teaming up to fight other monsters, while occasionally fighting each other for contrived reasons. Shared universes and monster mashes are the cinematic equivalent of a kid having all his toys duke it out even though it doesn't make sense that godzilla is fighting mr freeze.
Is that a reference to this mummy movie?
Marvel & DC universes actually make sense though.
One question: Does she survive the movie? She has been in a bunch of photos with the stars for the next Dark Universe movies but they've never mentioned her as returning after this one. Tag your answer.Saw it today and was not into it.
Too many ideas barely given time to breathe and a whole lot of advertising (I was worried when the film had a big ol' "Dark Universe" logo at the start).
The mummy was ok cause of Sofia, but that was just another aspect that didn't really go anywhere. Cruise's character was boring.
One question: Does she survive the movie? She has been in a bunch of photos with the stars for the next Dark Universe movies but they've never mentioned her as returning after this one. Tag your answer.
Bad News no Dredd 2GEE
HOW SHOCKING!!
Make Dredd 2 already, you buncha bozos.
I think the last trailer spoiled the ending of the film.
But it didn't look good from the get go, and Cruise seems very out of place in this. I'll be going to see Wonder Woman instead.
If the movie kept that ridiculous ADR scream from the trailer, I think I'll like it.
The trailers so far have done a bad job at selling the mummy herself. Is she going to do anything but scream and flip around?
Funnily, enough, if BVS hadn't happened, Man of Steel and Wonder Woman could have worked really well in the same way IMO. Both very separate different stories, with the slight connecting thread of Wayne Enterprises (the satellite in MoS, the framing device in WW). Hinting at a larger connected world, while wondering how these stories and worlds (aliens and mythological gods/magic) will collide.
Universal had a cinematic universe in the 40's/50's/60's that they created in an ad-hoc fashion. There's no reason that it couldn't work again, as long as they can get out a popular film. It doesn't even have to be good, just popular enough to keep the universe going as they adapt to audience and critic reactions.
Dracula, Frankenstein, Jekyll and Hyde, Wolfman, various Mummy movies etc have mountains of historically popular stories to pull from too. Plenty of adaptations, remakes etc of each property have been done and some of them were well received. The problem is in the execution of this specific movie, not the idea of the universe at all.
Universal never had a cinematic universe. They just had crossover movies that had nothing to do with any of the other movies. There is not consistency or through line. Hell sometimes even supposed sequels don't connect to what was supposed to be a prequel. Universal likes to pretend they had a single universe, but they really didn't.
Still. Its the Prototype of the idea.Universal never had a cinematic universe. They just had crossover movies that had nothing to do with any of the other movies. There is not consistency or through line. Hell sometimes even supposed sequels don't connect to what was supposed to be a prequel. Universal likes to pretend they had a single universe, but they really didn't.
Like the X-Men cinematic universe has any consistency...
Dayum. Tom Cruise output is normally so solid too.
In general I usually feel a certain amount of comfortable certainty that if I attend a Tom Cruise movie, it will at the very least achieve a certain level of entertainment competence. Not necessarily great but rarely horrible. I don't know if it's his discretion when choosing projects or if he exerts a certain level of control over the projects he's involved with, but it usually works out that way.
I'm very disappointed to hear all this about The Mummy. However since I am in the position to see it for free, I'll probably still do it.
Still. Its the Prototype of the idea.
So Nathan Drake.Cruise plays more of a thieving rogue in this, if that helps you decide. But the problem is that he is constantly told that he only cares about himself, but only one scene at the beginning really shows it to be true. The rest he plays as caring, and foolishly aloof to the things happening around him.
So Nathan Drake.
Honestly I liked this movie as much as I thought it would (that is, I liked it). It was a good action movie with good characters and a bunch of great scenes. Nothing spectacular but it's not as bad as people make it out to be. It's a good start to the Dark Universe and I hope their next movie is more well received critically. Honestly I just want more good Frankenstein and Dracula movies.
So is it true, thatthe ending leaves Tom Cruise as a god?