It's probably the fastest way to westernize. Choco has a port facing toward the Pacific, so reaching South America is an easy matter. Spain still doesn't know I exist either, even though we're neighbors.Didn't notice you were Westernizing off Spain, mgo.
It was the peasants' war that did them in.
Europe is also a hot mess right now. There is a new blue nation (Holland?) inside Burgundy and the coalition against Morfeo finally had enough. Denmark is leading the war against him together with France, Burgundy and a handful of smaller nations.
Ming succumbed quickly to an epic peasants war. I'm not sure a human player would have survived intact either. I could only catch glimpses of it, but the huge rebel stacks were occupying everything.
Three provinces from Korea; vassalize Korea in the next war.Please tell me Japan took the opportunity to grab some turf from them at least?
The event conditions aren't that stringent, though. One heir with an average claim strength and one bad war which drains your manpower and you already meet the hardest conditions (though even then it's rare; the average time in which it occurs is more than 50 years). Of course, there's no reason why a country as powerful as Ming, surrounded by so many non-threatening countries, should have manpower less than 0.25. A human player would obviously avoid that. However, the AI in general is awful at managing manpower, so it's not a problem endemic to the Ming AI.
Three provinces from Korea; vassalize Korea in the next war.
Wait... what did my country do!?
Joined France and Denmark in a punisment war against peaceful Piemont.
Could anybody give a summary of what happend when I was away? My once so peaceful nation seems like it is in a complete mess now
Isn't that war still on-going? I don't remember seeing a peace deal. But then again I was busy with my own wars.
The likelyness of it happening would have been lower as long as I was in alliance with Burgund, and i the case of such a war I would have given up at once (releasing provence and some vassals maybe), instead of destroying my manpower. Might be time to go I think.
Yup - in the last 3 sessions I've done nothing but go backwards. I've had to give up 6 provinces to Venice and Hungary, my prestige is somewhere a million miles below zero, I've had a regency council, lost my PU with Sweden and thus 40 years of trying to integrate them. I've got basically nowhere left to expand into, especially if other player characters drop out, because the AI won't even speak to me.
I won't quit though - I'm still learning things about the game, as badly as I'm doing, and it seems unfair just to bail out and end up with half as many players as we started with.
The 25% overextension is a really easy condition to meet, but for whatever reason the Ming AI wasn't doing much conquering (it never did annex Manchu, which was small and diplomatically isolated), so one of the other conditions must have triggered the peasant's war - if I had to guess, it was probably low legitimacy. I believe their legitimacy fell really low when their 20-year-old ruler died without an heir and a monarch from the Hosokawa dynasty ascended to the throne (my marriage policies paid off for once). Judging by one of the older saves I still have lying around, the Bureaucratic faction was apparently in effect at this time (not intentionally, of course). Their emperor simply died too young for the bonus to heir chance to matter.Yeah, I definitely wouldn't have gotten manpower that low, war exhaustion that high (or even above like...2), overextension at all really (vassals), and that number of loans (because I had like 10k in the bank). And the reason the Ming AI is especially likely to get a Peasant's war is that when it loses an heir, it doesn't know to switch back to the Bureaucratic faction with its increased chance of heir, so it's stuck with the inward perfection -50% chance of heir, making it very likely that it gets a low legitimacy heir.
So yeah, impossible to get as a player controlled Ming.
Something not helped by the fact that the AI loves making the ruler a unit leader. Also I'm not sure I ever had 25% overextension during the game for more than maybe three months? I am not an aggressive player. Stability was my main angle, which included converting buddhist provinces, something the AI didn't do for some reason despite being able to thanks to the religious ideas I'd chosen.The 25% overextension is a really easy condition to meet, but for whatever reason the Ming AI wasn't doing much conquering (it never did annex Manchu, which was small and diplomatically isolated), so one of the other conditions must have triggered the peasant's war - if I had to guess, it was probably low legitimacy. I believe their legitimacy fell really low when their 20-year-old ruler died without an heir and a monarch from the Hosokawa dynasty ascended to the throne (my marriage policies paid off for once). Judging by one of the older saves I still have lying around, the Bureaucratic faction was apparently in effect at this time (not intentionally, of course). Their emperor simply died too young for the bonus to heir chance to matter.