Null plus Null macht Null,
widewidewitt mal zwei macht weiter Null.
Raab is that you?
Null plus Null macht Null,
widewidewitt mal zwei macht weiter Null.
France had apparently impressed a bit a couple days ago in the pre-show, I'd be curious to know whether they would have indeed missed the finals. Very possible, though...
Here was the journalists votes :
What I find interesting is that the bookmakers top 5 (Sweden, Russia, Italia, Belgium, Australia) was right, if I'm not mistaken.
Raab is that you?
People prefer music from similar and known cultures, thus neighbors have huge advantages. Also Russia can export their culture to more countries compared to Azerbaijan or Georgia. This gives them some base points, with a decent song they can turn this into a victory.
Similar effect can be seen around balkans and scandinavia but these regions don't have a culture pusher like Russia.
Never thought they had a chance... But passing the semifinals could have been doable, I think.I liked France's song but with that much competition they didn't have a chance.
The 50/50 split between a jury of 5 persons (never understood who the where) and televoting is mandatory for the ESC:Weird. What's the role of the jury from those two countries? Can ESC say "fuck your jury" and make 100% of the televote count even though the country intended to do some type of 50/50 split?
The 50/50 split between a jury of 5 persons (never understood who the where) and televoting is mandatory for the ESC:
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/about/voting
If I understood correctly, only the televoting (no jury) has been used for those two countries, and that's the reason for the problem?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6IYKJQd7P0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPl3mjTd9u0
I should've watched the deaf edition, this is fantastic
Yes, I've seen a couple names for my national jury, but I'm still wondering how it works... (how they're chosen, in particular)The 5 jurists are people from the music industry of the respective country - musicians, producers, writers, that kinda stuff.
Yes, after re-reading, that's what I finally concluded. That's strange...And no, they observed some stuff with the Montenegrin and Macedonian juries, so they excluded their votes and only used the televotings for those 2 countries.
The 50/50 split between a jury of 5 persons (never understood who the where) and televoting is mandatory for the ESC:
http://www.eurovision.tv/page/about/voting
If I understood correctly, only the televoting (no jury) has been used for those two countries, and that's the reason for the problem?
This rule basically says Eurovision calculates the final score by combining the 50% from the jury (which was already done before the final based on the second dress rehearsal, as said in the quote above) and the 50% the country reports from the televote:Professional juries are also required to vote. They determine 50% of the outcome. The jury, which consists of five members (including a chairperson) is the same jury that voted in one of the Semi-Finals. They will watch live and rank all songs based on the second Dress Rehearsal, the so called Jury Final;
There are also these rules:The EBU’s voting partner digame will determine the national result by merging these two ranked lists, and will award 12 points to the country with the best combined rank of the jury and the televoting, then 10 points to country with the second-best combined rank, etc. The country ranked 10th in the combined ranking receives 1 point;
Maybe someone was found to be related to an artist or they were all 55-year-old men who judged entries based on how hot the singer was.The jury consists of a variety of members in terms of age, gender, and background;
All jury members must be citizens of the country they are representing;
None of the jury members must be connected to any of the participating songs/artists in such a way that they cannot vote independently. The participating broadcasters must send a letter of compliance with the voting instructions together with signed declarations by each jury member stating that they will vote independently;
The names of the jury members must be revealed by the relevant participating broadcasters during the Final;
Each jury member of each national jury must rank all songs in the show;
The combined rank of each country’s jury members determines the jury result of that particular country;
By judging each song each jury member will focus on the vocal capacity of the artist(s), the performance on stage, the composition and originality of the song, and the overall impression by the act.
Maybe someone was found to be related to an artist or they were all 55-year-old men who judged entries based on how hot the singer was.
Like NeoGAF did.
Übermatik;164973597 said:I dunno, I've been thinking about this a bit, and even though a lot of people see Eurovision as corrupt and subject to political bias etc., I still really like the concept and presentation of the show. It's awesome, seeing countries of all sizes and 'influence' come together like this in creative expression.
It's one of the rare moments in the year where I have genuine thoughts like "Y'know what, the Moldavians are alright", or "Hey, Azerbaijan are pretty cool".
Heh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6IYKJQd7P0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPl3mjTd9u0
I should've watched the deaf edition, this is fantastic
The thing is...the guy that actually won didn't want go and he beat Ann Sophie convincingly. Without him, Alexa probably would've won, because he gobbled up all the "singer/songwriter" votes.Haha Germany 0 Points.
I also heard that Alexa Feser was one of the participants of the qualifying in Germany, is that true? If so, why the hell didn't we vote for her? She would probably also only got a few points but at least it would have been a song to not be ashamed of.
You can be cynical and still enjoy the spectacle and celebration of different cultures, etc.
And it's obviously a huge deal for the performers, who usually don't deserve to be caught up in the external political firestorms.
The way the EBU handled the Azerbaijan contest was all kinds of gross, but the show itself was still fine.
Sweden is basically the fifth of the big four at this point.
And it's obviously a huge deal for the performers, who usually don't deserve to be caught up in the external political firestorms.
Next years song will be about a lovely horse.
Übermatik;164974488 said:What happened here?
The thing is...the guy that actually won didn't want go and he beat Ann Sophie convincingly. Without him, Alexa probably would've won, because he gobbled up all the "singer/songwriter" votes.
Also, she would've sung in German, that would have been a big plus I think.
Lots of stuff, but basically:
the EBU's platform is clear that its participating members have certain basic standards, such as press freedoms, support for basic human rights, etc. When Azerbaijan won the contest and got the right to host in 2012, their abhorrent human rights record was put under the spotlight and EBU officials spent that entire year making excuses for Azerbaijan's government and sidestepping difficult questions.
They tried to soften the criticism by not punishing Loreen (that year's eventual winner) when she met with local human rights groups, but the whole thing was a mess. The EBU was probably much happier when the contest went to the more politically safe Sweden the following year.
He declined immediately after winning the spot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr4pRZoN-LcI did not pay attention to the whole process of finding someone for the ESC. So we didn't actually send the person who won? No wonder this song that did end up there performed so poorly.
I always wondered what would happen if Armenia won at Azerbaijan or Cyprus won in Turkey, Kosovo won in Russia?
How would they handle that, I assume they'll have a plan for it.
Armenia didn't even participate in Baku, it was one of the many controversies that year. They were fined by the EBU for pulling out before the contest. I imagine there would be similar awkward arrangements re: Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Russia, etc.
It sucks for those of us who just want a fun, big party
Georgia withdrew from the contest in Russia 2008, actually, that was when that whole South Ossetia thing happened.
Why can't Europe appreciate a good piano burning?
was that the "We Don't Wanna Put In" year?
It was somewhere around there, iirc
I also wish Lebanon/Morocco/etc. would participate, lots of talent in those countries
I hope the EBU officially recognizes Kosovo at some point, too
so will Polina ever be see her family again?
Russia (and Belgium) had the best songs imo and political voting kind of sucks
Full voting results released.
Time to comb through and find all the crazy discrepancies between the televote and the juries.
"The first Semi-Final saw Russia placed first with 182 points, followed by Belgium with 149 points, and then third was Estonia with 105 points.
The second Semi-Final saw Sweden placed first with 217 points, followed by Latvia with 155 points, and then third was Israel with 151 points."
This jury business is bollocks. The televote put Lithuania as the first result. But when combined with the jury they were 7th for the UK.
What's the point of the voting if it doesn't represent the voters?
New ban gif for bish? Yeah do that guys!
Thank you! Now somebody add bish!