Falcom reportedly expanding the Kiseki games to more platforms (3DS, Smartphones, PC)

Ok, then subplant that with suikoden ds, the world ends with you, blue dragon 2, dragon quest IX, dq monsters joker 2, devil survivor, mario and luigi, any of the pokemons, strange journies, the metroidvanias, solatorobo, atelier annie ( I enjoyed this one a bunch) ect or any number of US releases.
Genso Suikoden Tierkreis did not sell very well in the US. "Success" seems to be equivalent to sales.

Mario and Luigi, any of the Pokemon titles, and Dragon Quest IX, I'll give ya.
 
Having to count the metroidvanias as RPGs to get to a dozen titles of (partly dubious) success doesn't really strengthen your original point about "25 hands".

why? those metroidvania titles were awesome and were as much rpgs as anything. I could keep going, but its boring. But I will give 3 of my all time favorite titles I didnt list ie golden sun 3, glory of heracles V,Radiant Historia
 
why? those metroidvania titles were awesome and were as much rpgs as anything. I could keep going, but its boring. But I will give 3 of my all time favorite titles I didnt list ie golden sun 3, glory of heracles V,Radiant Historia
No wonder you were able to think of 125 "good" games.
 
Having to count the metroidvanias as RPGs to get to a dozen titles of (partly dubious) success doesn't really strengthen your original point about "25 hands".
One wouldn't need to count them get well past a dozen anyway. You could list nearly a dozen Pokémon RPGs alone.
 
One wouldn't to count them get well past a dozen anyway. You could list nearly a dozen Pokémon RPGs alone.

I didnt want to go that route.


But in terms of pokemon


I didnt like any of the 3 ranger titles

I enjoyed the 2 mystery dungeon gen titles, I liked conquest, I am currently diggin black white 2, and I enjoyed gens 4 and 5, and the remakes of gold silver
 
How well did Dragon Quest IX and Joker 2 do?
Dunno about Joker 2, but I swear DQIX sold about 130K in its first month here according to NPD.

Edit: Yeah, kinda.

Stealth20k said:
I think for a side game it did well.

I didnt know it sold 200k worldwide though, thats impressive
Not impressive when you take into consideration the sales of previous titles in the series in the US, Rhapsodia in particular. I should really update that graph now that we have numbers for Genso Suikoden: Tsumugareshi Hyakunen no Toki.
 
why? those metroidvania titles were awesome and were as much rpgs as anything. I could keep going, but its boring. But I will give 3 of my all time favorite titles I didnt list ie golden sun 3, glory of heracles V,Radiant Historia

Wow. :\
I'm a huge fan of the Glory of Heracles games, was super hyped about the DS game, and it disappointed me so much that I was put off of video games entirely for 6 months. I'm surprised that someone likes it enough to call it one of their all-time favorites.
 
I'm kidding. I haven't played either game, but most of GAF seems to have opinions that run contrary to yours.

Which is fine. I am a huge rpg fanboy, i will be the first to admit that. So I will stand up for them where I can if I think its correct. I wouldnt expect anyone else to be so rpg hardcore
 
Dunno about Joker 2, but I swear DQIX sold about 130K in its first month here according to NPD.

Edit: Yeah, kinda.
Ah, okay. That's better than I thought.

Not impressive when you take into consideration the sales of previous titles in the series in the US, Rhapsodia in particular. I should really update that graph now that we have numbers for Genso Suikoden: Tsumugareshi Hyakunen no Toki.
Don't update it. I want to stay blissfully ignorant about the downward spiral of Suikoden.

Which is fine. I am a huge rpg fanboy, i will be the first to admit that. So I will stand up for them where I can if I think its correct. I wouldnt expect anyone else to be so rpg hardcore
I don't even know what to say.
 
Dunno about Joker 2, but I swear DQIX sold about 130K in its first month here according to NPD.

Edit: Yeah, kinda.


Not impressive when you take into consideration the sales of previous titles in the series in the US, Rhapsodia in particular. I should really update that graph now that we have numbers for Genso Suikoden: Tsumugareshi Hyakunen no Toki.

different systems and situations ( I hate comparing sales).
 
Wow. :\
I'm a huge fan of the Glory of Heracles games, was super hyped about the DS game, and it disappointed me so much that I was put off of video games entirely for 6 months. I'm surprised that someone likes it enough to call it one of their all-time favorites.


Ive played them all and honestly it was my second favorite, and one of my favorite rpgs on the ds, I wouldnt joke about it. Sorry you had a bad experience though
 
Anyway let me try and get back on topic.

I love legend of heroes.


Ive important them all but I had to stop because they were too hard to play with my limited japanese knowledge, so I just have them collected.


But trails.........man........what a prologue to the VI trilogy.

If the main game of SC never comes here it will be a huge travesty. To me it would be like How I felt playing shining force 3 part 1 and then nada for part 2 and 3
 
Anyway let me try and get back on topic.

I love legend of heroes.


Ive important them all but I had to stop because they were too hard to play with my limited japanese knowledge, so I just have them collected.


But trails.........man........what a prologue to the VI trilogy.

If the main game of SC never comes here it will be a huge travesty. To me it would be like How I felt playing shining force 3 part 1 and then nada for part 2 and 3

Suikode on DS was a success, come on. A spin-off on a Nintendo handheld selling at least 56k in the US is not a flop by any means.

Dragon Quest IX sold a million units in the West.

you sure it sold a million, in the west?

The latest figure I saw was somewhere between 500-750k........

@Khold

sorry for triple posting I didnt mean to
 
stealth20k do you own a copy of attack of the saiyans


I own a copy of pretty much every rpg, but yeah I do have it. I gave it a 20 minute shot, and I didnt want to play it anymore. But I have it nearly mint. I cant believe monolith had its good name attached to it

any reason for the question?
 
fXZs6.png


If you are going to post so much fix your avatar. White box was bothering me
 
Edit: Er, anyway, back on-topic.

Branching the series out to other systems is a good thing in the long run, especially for localizations. I really want to play the rest of the games if they're localized.

lunch said:
Don't update it. I want to stay blissfully ignorant about the downward spiral of Suikoden.
Ahaha. I thought the PSP game brought some cool stuff to the table for the series. Plus I felt more engaged with it than Tierkreis (which took me three attempts to get through...). Tierkreis had better sound and presentation, though. As of now, though, I think the PSP game has less sales than Tierkreis (82 435). It launched at about 59,800 or so, and Tierkreis launched at 62 835, which is... surprisingly not that bad. I thought it would've did worse.

Stealth20k said:
different systems and situations ( I hate comparing sales).
Please do elaborate when/if you get the chance.

electroplankton said:
Suikoden on DS sold nicely on the US, come on. A spin-off on a Nintendo handheld selling at least 56k in the US is not a flop by any means.
We've had this discussion before, and we agreed to disagree at that time. :)

Those numbers are up to June 2011 or something? I wonder if they've been updated since then.
 
fXZs6.png


If you are going to post so much fix your avatar. White box was bothering me

how do I fix it?


@Dark Schala

Meaning it doesnt mean too much to me comparing sales of different games because of so many different things that are Incorporated into the sales figures ( Youll learn that about me, I try to avoid sales vs sales fights)
 
Ahaha. I thought the PSP game brought some cool stuff to the table for the series. Plus I felt more engaged with it than Tierkreis (which took me three attempts to get through...). Tierkreis had better sound and presentation, though. As of now, though, I think the PSP game has less sales than Tierkreis (82 435). It launched at about 59,800 or so, and Tierkreis launched at 62 835.
Oh cool, I'll read your write-up then. The first Suikoden is one of my favorite games, but the second hand prices for every other game in the series are absurdly high so I've never played past the first, and everything I've seen of Tierkreis turns me off. I wish the PSP game came out here, but I suppose that's a ridiculous request.

how do I fix it?
The same way you changed your avatar to begin with.
 
DQ9 shipped 1 million between NA and Europe combined, but as far as I know, that shipment is still in stores and hasn't been replenished. I only know US sales so it's hard to say exactly where it is when Europe is factored in.
 
Dragon Quest IX sold a million units in the West: http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/pdf/2011/110128e.pdf

IIRC, 358/2 Days and Re:coded sold pretty well in the US (800k and 300k respectively).

Etrian Odyssey sold well and hold nicely entry after entry.

Rune Factory seems to have sold pretty ok as well.

The World Ends With You sold at least 140k in the US which is not bad at all, given also the following it got throughout the years.

Devil Survivor exceeded Atlus expectations (40k versus initial projections of 25k): http://www.siliconera.com/2009/10/06/well-how-many-copies-did-persona-4-and-devil-survivor-sell/

Suikoden sold fine, I mean, it's not that on PS2 and PS1 (where there were mainline Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Star Ocean, Tales of, etc.) had sold way better. For a low budget spin-off that had already sold well in Japan (almost on par with V) they're not bad numbers by any means.

I remember that someone released NPD sales for the month of June some years ago, and it came out that even Knight in the Nightmare could manage to sell 27k during its first month!

Etc.
 
Hope that's better.

I forgot about rune factory

I liked 3

@dark, you wont regret it

Ive heard from alot of japanese players that the VI trilogy is the best trilogy of any game series theyve ever played


Trails is literally only the prologue

and Second chapter is the main game

and third is the epilogue


So only having trails is like only getting arc the lad 1, without getting 2 ( which was also the main game)
 
Trails is literally only the prologue

and Second chapter is the main game

and third is the epilogue

Not quite.

FC is the first half, SC is the second half.
You can go without 3rd, but if you intend to go beyond the Sora titles and to Zero and Ao, it is absolutely required. It is the bridging story to the next part.
 
Hearing all this Trails stuff is depressing because I am only ~10 hours into the game and I knowing that we (us) might (likely) not see its sequel (its second half!? that's even worse) is sad
 
Not quite.

FC is the first half, SC is the second half.
You can go without 3rd, but if you intend to go beyond the Sora titles and to Zero and Ao, it is absolutely required. It is the bridging story to the next part.

Well that was just the way I heard second chapter described.

Third is the epiloge so that makes sense you wouldnt need it..... for the first 2.


But yeah for zero and blue you do need it


nayuta is a ys ish side game so thats stand alone
 
Not quite.

FC is the first half, SC is the second half.
You can go without 3rd, but if you intend to go beyond the Sora titles and to Zero and Ao, it is absolutely required. It is the bridging story to the next part.
If I try to play Zero no Kiseki without having played 3rd, will I be confused, or will I just miss out on some crossovers?
 
Hearing all this Trails stuff is depressing because I am only ~10 hours into the game and I knowing that we might not see its sequel (it's second half!? that's even worse) is sad



And second chapter is like 50 percent larger too. Its enormous......
 
Not quite.

FC is the first half, SC is the second half.
You can go without 3rd, but if you intend to go beyond the Sora titles and to Zero and Ao, it is absolutely required. It is the bridging story to the next part.

You can go without 3rd in that SC has an ending that wraps stuff up, but man... 3rd not only bridges into Zero/Ao, it also much more deeply explores stuff from FC/SC. In my opinion, it's still a crucial title, even if you don't plan to go onto Zero and Ao.
 
If I try to play Zero no Kiseki without having played 3rd, will I be confused, or will I just miss out on some crossovers?

You should be fine......I mean its like missing some subtext but, it wont be impossible


it reminds me of the parallels between arc the lad 1,2,3
 
If I try to play Zero no Kiseki without having played 3rd, will I be confused, or will I just miss out on some crossovers?

You'll be less lost than you would be if you hadn't played FC/SC, but you'll still be missing quite a lot, especially when you get to Ao.
 
If I try to play Zero no Kiseki without having played 3rd, will I be confused, or will I just miss out on some crossovers?

You can go without 3rd in that SC has an ending that wraps stuff up, but man... 3rd not only bridges into Zero/Ao, it also much more deeply explores stuff from FC/SC. In my opinion, it's still a crucial title, even if you don't plan to go onto Zero and Ao.

I actually like the way SC ends when you haven't played 3rd. It's a good, settled ending with enough threads to give you an idea of things to come, but it's not a killer 'how many plot threads are still dangling?' sort of ending.

3rd is actually my favorite of the games, story-wise, personally. ...and the three year wait that we had from 3rd to Zero, for me, was incredibly maddening. Primarily because of the fact that what was tied up nice and neat in SC was blown open for you to see in 3rd.

Don't get me wrong, 3rd is an incredible game when it comes to getting detailed information on Zemuria, and while it's a good ending without an actual cliffhanger, you will still be left with so many questions by the time all is finished.

But I do believe that Zero, and ESPECIALLY Ao no Kiseki, require some of this world building information that is brought up in 3rd. Falcom said that you could play Zero without previous knowledge of the series, but I believe that you won't have the impact of the narrative that you would've had otherwise.
 
My favorite is probably trails, since I havent finished any of the ones after it.

But I did enjoy the 3-5 trilogy, which I beat

speaking with tom gives good insite as to why second chapter is in xseed hell

they want to put it on the psp physically, but only if they can get the psn or steam version to work too, but they are having problems on that front

and with a team of less than 5 localizing, its just rough
 
I actually like the way SC ends when you haven't played 3rd. It's a good, settled ending with enough threads to give you an idea of things to come, but it's not a killer 'how many plot threads are still dangling?' sort of ending.

3rd is actually my favorite of the games, story-wise, personally. ...and the three year wait that we had from 3rd to Zero, for me, was incredibly maddening. Primarily because of the fact that what was tied up nice and neat in SC was blown open for you to see in 3rd.

Don't get me wrong, 3rd is an incredible game when it comes to getting detailed information on Zemuria, and while it's a good ending without an actual cliffhanger, you will still be left with so many questions by the time all is finished.

But I do believe that Zero, and ESPECIALLY Ao no Kiseki, require some of this world building information that is brought up in 3rd. Falcom said that you could play Zero without previous knowledge of the series, but you won't have the impact of the narrative that you would've had otherwise.

Honestly, let's just face it - you have to play all of the games, in order, because they're all important. The Kiseki series is something that other developers don't try to do because they're so afraid of sales dropoff (and, I suppose to be fair, Falcom is starting to, which is one of the reasons why Nayuta is being made, despite Ao being the best-selling one by far). It's an actual ongoing story with real dependencies on previous games in each new game. And it's one of the things I love it for.
 
I dont think falcom is worried.......


nayuta is just a side game, they were very forthcoming with the fact it was not a main line title
 
Top Bottom