Not even remotely. Other than turn-based battles DQIX is exceptionally modern.seady said:Is this pretty much Dragon Quest IX clone?
Scythesurge said:As a FF1 fan I was extremely excited about this game when it was announced, but after hearing about the battle system my interest decreased. I'd still like to give it a try though, despite it not being what I was hoping it would be.
Actually, I made a mistake. It says it was $29.99 at Gamestop but that's after a pre-order deal where they take $5 off.djtiesto said:Nice that it's $30, got kinda sick of paying the S-E tax after a while
Amneisac said:If I were only going to get DQIX or this for the next 6 months, which would you guys recommend?
I doubt there will be a reprint of Chrono Trigger. Gamestop may carry used copies or new ones if you get lucky.Amneisac said:So, I think I'll pick this up someday, I love the old school FF games. Something funny that this made me realize though and not to hijack the thread:
I usually wait until DS games are $19.99 (they get there pretty quickly) and Chrono Trigger has been $19.99 or lower for a while, but I've just never got it (I have the SNES version), but I've always wanted it.
When I went to Amazon to check on Four Heroes I realized that Chrono Trigger was out of stock, and it was out of stock at walmart, and best buy and a lot of other places I looked. I wound up getting it at Sam's for $18, but that was a little scary. Anyone know if it's getting a reprint?
If I were only going to get DQIX or this for the next 6 months, which would you guys recommend?
Without even having to think about it, DQ9. They're not even in the same league, not even close. It's like asking which you should get out of Super Mario Galaxy 2 and, like, Blade Kitten.Amneisac said:If I were only going to get DQIX or this for the next 6 months, which would you guys recommend?
It's not that bad. More like between SMG2 and Jak and Dexter.Segata Sanshiro said:It's like asking which you should get out of Super Mario Galaxy 2 and, like, Blade Kitten.
No, see, that's comparing a 10 game and a 9 game. Those two are a clear league apart, but at least it's the next league over. DQ9 and 4HoL are so far apart in terms of quality that the choice, I feel, actually has an objective correct and incorrect answer.TheFLYINGManga_Ka said:It's not that bad. More like between SMG2 and Jak and Dexter.
seady said:Is this pretty much Dragon Quest IX clone?
Yeah, but I think FF4HoL is more like a 8 game as I play it right now.Segata Sanshiro said:No, see, that's comparing a 10 game and a 9 game. Those two are a clear league apart, but at least it's the next league over. DQ9 and 4HoL are so far apart in terms of quality that the choice, I feel, actually has an objective correct and incorrect answer.
And I've actually played through both of them.
Uh huh.TheChillyAcademic said:4 Heroes of Light may not be the best game out there, but please, dont compare it to that mess.
What can I say? The game really let me down. Considering who worked on it, the fact that it turned out as what can be charitably described as an acceptable game with incredibly deep flaws is a major disappointment.blu said:Segata Sanshiro
Poo-pooing FFT4WL since 2009
(Today, 01:18 AM)
Reply | Quote
Don't disagree with you at all Segata. If it wasn't for the art style I probably won't think to highly of it as I do right now.Segata Sanshiro said:What can I say? The game really let me down. Considering who worked on it, the fact that it turned out as what can be charitably described as an acceptable game with incredibly deep flaws is a major disappointment.
Actually I was merely pointing out you're doing a service to me. That way I won't get into the game with set expectations, instead I'll just let it reveal itself to me. You may be surprised how many good games I've played like that, games that gaf has greeted with disdain and snobbery (not implying anything about you here ; )Segata Sanshiro said:What can I say? The game really let me down. Considering who worked on it, the fact that it turned out as what can be charitably described as an acceptable game with incredibly deep flaws is a major disappointment.
The game gets pretty tedious, I guess. With the limited inventory, difficulty spike when it comes to bosses, lack of direction, and lot's of grinding.ronito said:So I keep hearing people pan the game.
But why? what's so wrong with it?
I don't feel like typing stuff out again, but here are some posts that might shed some light for you:ronito said:So I keep hearing people pan the game.
But why? what's so wrong with it?
I haven't hit those yet, but I probably will later on.Segata Sanshiro said:Ultimately, I found the game's positive points were largely outweighed by a few boneheaded design decisions working in tandem to devastating effect.
I read those impressions when they were posted and they were a huge reason why any anticipation for this was immediately deflated. Pretty sure I won't even stifle a small cry if I never play this.Segata Sanshiro said:I don't feel like typing stuff out again, but here are some posts that might shed some light for you:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=18255032&postcount=61
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=18274007&postcount=74
duckroll's impressions really reflect a lot of my sentiments as well:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=18378584&postcount=136
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=18411701&postcount=156
Ultimately, I found the game's positive points were largely outweighed by a few boneheaded design decisions working in tandem to devastating effect.
Well, someone asked which would be better between this and DQ9, so I felt it was fair to answer.duckroll said:You know Segata, I dislike this game probably as much as you do, mostly because I was so disappointed with the gameplay and it seems like a waste because the art direction is SO GOOD. But I do think that to be fair, we should let people who are interested in the English version play it themselves and make up their own mind. That's one of the reasons I've stayed away from the 4WoL threads for a while now. If people are interested enough in the game to try it out, I think they should be free to without being hit over the head about how bad the game is from those who have played it.
When all of those interested have experienced the game for themselves, it'll be a more equal playing field to discuss what the game did right and what it did wrong. Otherwise, it'll remain largely a one-sided argument. Just as it is silly for those who have not played the game to attempt to defend it and dismiss criticisms, it is equally silly to attempt to tell people who have not played the game or are early in the game, that they will eventually not like it or find problems with it.
That's basically my take on the issue.
Segata Sanshiro said:Well, someone asked which would be better between this and DQ9, so I felt it was fair to answer.
Segata Sanshiro said:Well, someone asked which would be better between this and DQ9, so I felt it was fair to answer.
And yet, clearly a better game. I never said DQ9 was flawless, for the record.TheChillyAcademic said:Eh, DQ IX has its own fantastic share of problems, for the record.
Segata Sanshiro said:And yet, clearly a better game. I never said DQ9 was flawless, for the record.
I do feel the same way.duckroll said:I would kill to have a game which played like DQIX but looked like 4WoL.