• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth | PC Review Thread

Scrawnton

Member
Is this a full fat rpg (endless menus, stats, turn based battles) etc or something more user friendly for an rpg virgin?
Extremely user friendly. Easy mode is a breeze but normal mode is easy to grapple. There's also a ton of side content if you want to overlevel yourself to make it easy as you go through it.
 

Bojji

Member


Fucking 3060ti runs this game ~PS5 Pro performance on high settings (is high higher than console settings?):

3ffNSqJ.jpeg
hBFul4I.jpeg
TAgmX57.jpeg



Released to critical acclaim almost one year ago on the PlayStation 5, Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth's port to the PC is unlikely to achieve the same accolades in the PC gaming community. Not because it's a bad conversion and not because the game itself is poor—Square Enix has done an excellent job of making the Windows version run very well, if the PC meets certain requirements. And on maximum quality, it does look better than the PS5 version.
 
Fucking 3060ti runs this game ~PS5 Pro performance on high settings (is high higher than console settings?):

3ffNSqJ.jpeg
hBFul4I.jpeg
TAgmX57.jpeg


One thing people should note when you purchase AMD products on PC, which is that when RX 6700 XT was launch, it use easily beat RTX 3060 Ti by margin of 10%. RX 6750 XT is 8% overall faster than RX 6700 XT and it is almost 5% slower in this game.
AMD rx 6xxx and 7xxx performance on new game is decreasing. This happening since August 2024.
 
Last edited:

Bojji

Member
One thing people should note when you purchase AMD products on PC, which is also impact imo Sony as well is that when RX 6700 XT was launch, it use easily beat RTX 3060 Ti by margin of 10%. RX 6750 XT is 8% overall faster than RX 6700 XT and it is almost 5% slower in this game.
AMD rx 6xxx and 7xxx performance on new game is decreasing. This happening since August 2024.

This could be UE4 related, this engine was Nv friendly.

His GPU alone costs more than a Pro.

550$ 4070 will give you better than Pro experience as well (maybe 4060ti as well?). Same is true for 3080 (and similar) GPUs from 2020.
 

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
But the person playing it says it does…

And that person is known to be hyperbolic.
Maybe we simply have different definitions of “blows it out of the water”. It largely looks like the same game. Maybe if playing it at higher than 60 fps is a priority for you

Whether you play on a 4090 or ps5 pro, you’re going to get a good experience
 
Last edited:

James Sawyer Ford

Gold Member
To be fair some people say that pro versions blow the ps5 out of the water and I wouldn't agree on that either.

The base ps5 @ 60 looked atrocious, in that case I would say it blows it out of the water.

That’s a much bigger leap than ps5 pro to a higher end pc, because ps5 pro at 60 fps already looks great and it’s not like pc is adding in all kinds of advanced ray tracing features
 
Last edited:

Fabieter

Member
The base ps5 @ 60 looked atrocious, in that case I would say it blows it out of the water.

That’s a much bigger leap than ps5 pro to a higher end pc, because ps5 pro at 60 fps already looks great and it’s not like pc is adding in all kinds of advanced ray tracing features

Relax I made a point for you.
 

Lootlord

Member
Everything looks so much better. No weird textures at all.
How can you even say this with a straight face when in your 2nd screenshot the ground textures are super low res?
I've looked at several videos now and there are many of those ultra muddy textures still.
Haven't seen such low res textures in a long time tbh and don't tell me it's UE4, just look at games like Days Gone, it has very good ground textures even for todays standards.
 
Top Bottom