I'd prefer taking the REmake approach. It's basically the perfect remake.
REmake came out at a time where the classic RE formula was still prevalent, before RE took a new direction with RE4.
Who knows what REmake 2 will be like.
I'd prefer taking the REmake approach. It's basically the perfect remake.
Bravely default has a metacritic of 85, while FFXV is 81 on PS4 and 84 on xbone.
I don't think this is automatically true.
Don't forget Fire Emblem or Persona!pssst don't go and destroy the TB never ever successful dinosaur narrative!
XCOM and Pokemon don't count either.
Fact is TB means it can never be mainstream or good and will always feel slow and clunky :-x
Id be ok with this.Give this game to Platinum so they'll actually finish it on time.
Honestly, turn-based gameplay is arguably more popular than it's ever been. Like Hearthstone alone is a bigger success than any Final Fantasy game ever. For JRPGs specifically, Pokemon is apparently still doing amazing. Persona 5 will probably end up as a bigger critical success than FF15.Not shocked at all. Gamers and reviewers of today tend to look down upon turn-based combat and FFVII: RE would be panned for staying with it despite the original being turn based.
Note that I don't agree with this decision and I fully expect the gameplay of this to suffer for it.
Don't forget Fire Emblem or Persona!
I hope they replace Tifa with Ariana Grande
Hold circle to win feels so fresh and better...I welcome this expected change. Menu based combat is so limiting and quickly becomes boring because there is no skillful challenge.
So many turn based jrpg devs resorting to auto battle, turbo, etc options to get players out of the mindless gameplay pretty much confirms there is nothing fresh to be done with that style of gameplay. Just more redundant systems being added on top of redundant systems.
Good, XV has the best battle system from the mainline series. If you're one of the five people that wants to play a turn based rpg on their home console, you can go play the original.
I welcome this expected change. Menu based combat is so limiting and quickly becomes boring because there is no skillful challenge.
So many turn based jrpg devs resorting to auto battle, turbo, etc options to get players out of the mindless gameplay pretty much confirms there is nothing fresh to be done with that style of gameplay. Just more redundant systems being added on top of redundant systems.
Honestly, turn-based gameplay is arguably more popular than it's ever been. Like Hearthstone alone is a bigger success than any Final Fantasy game ever. For JRPGs specifically, Pokemon is apparently still doing amazing. Persona 5 will probably end up as a bigger critical success than FF15.
I agree with you--the gameplay of the remake will suffer for abandoning a turn-based system. Square has pretty much always screwed up their action combat, which almost invariably ends up as floaty-feeling and shallow; it baffles me that anyone expects anything different for this iteration.
So the combat will be completely different and they've already said that they are making story changes as well. Some remake this is.
Well arent you a peach
There isnt a precedent for remakes being completely new games so its not like the opposite position is somehow crazy or unreasonable
Its a big gamble so hopefully it pays of for Nomura since he seemed intent on tearing everything down and starting over
Even though they are basically building off the back of 15 starting with the engine. I imagine the similarities arent going to end there
You have to imagine the dissenting opinions are more than valid considering the criticisms levied against 15
Nowhere did I argue sales, just pointing out that those are two successful modern turn based franchises to dispel the narrative that this type of gameplay is obsolete. Take a chill pill.Neither Fire Emblem nor Persona sell as much as a Final Fantasy entry does. FFVII Remake will run circles around both in terms of sales and mainstream appeal.
And I have no idea why people are comparing design blueprints of 3DS RPGs to FFVII Remake. Jesus Christ.
They're making this game in the mid-to-late 2010s, not the mid-to-late 1990s. If they just made the same basic game again, what would be the point? I've been viewing this as "what if we made FF7 in 2017 instead of 1997?" since it was announced, because it's been pretty clear that's the angle they're taking, and good on them, IMO.
But also, you're 100% wrong about the engine. It's not "built on the back" of 15 at all. 15 uses SE's in-house Luminous engine, whereas FF7r uses Unreal.
I'd love to see FFXVI revert back to a turn-based system, but I doubt it. Knowing how tone-deaf Square Enix can be, they'll probably make another go of setting it in an open world again to add salt to the wound.
going forward, turn-based and production values will be mutually exclusive
that market is too small for huge budgets
embrace indies or adapt to the glorious real-timefuturepresent
And turn based systems usually are?
I'd love to see FFXVI revert back to a turn-based system, but I doubt it. Knowing how tone-deaf Square Enix can be, they'll probably make another go of setting it in an open world again to add salt to the wound.
How does "Same genre as the original" become "same basic game" to you.They're making this game in the mid-to-late 2010s, not the mid-to-late 1990s. If they just made the same basic game again, what would be the point? I've been viewing this as "what if we made FF7 in 2017 instead of 1997?" since it was announced, because it's been pretty clear that's the angle they're taking, and good on them, IMO.
Good, XV has the best battle system from the mainline series. If you're one of the five people that wants to play a turn based rpg on their home console, you can go play the original.
I guess you mean flashier. 12 has probably the best combat system in the series. 15 has one of the worst.
How does "Same genre as the original" become "same basic game" to you.
I just compare all this to REmake 2
http://neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1339624
People still want that to be resident evil 2