Again, too many strikers.elsk said:There's a rumor around: Falcao to Chelsea this summer. What you guys think?
Again, too many strikers.elsk said:There's a rumor around: Falcao to Chelsea this summer. What you guys think?
near said:Its possible, he has stated that he wants to test himself in England. Its now just a case of AVB wanting he's services at Stamford Bridge. He's release clause is £26million, I don't know whether Chelsea are willing to pay that when they have a list of other targets in mind, so AVB would really have to want him imo.
All of this Arsenal bashing in the past few pages is really unjustified. We came really reallyMoobabe said:I simply can't stomach any more of Kermit's posts. No offence - but you're easily one of the worst posters in this thread. You're ignorant, aggressive and your constant attacking of fans whose clubs you deem inferior to own is completely ridiculous.
While I'm no fan of some of the Man Utd posters in here they don't come close to your drivel. Sometimes we try to respect each other's clubs - acknowledge teams who are playing well and who have been successful. Arsenal haven't won anything in 6/7 years - they still play the most attractive football in the league. And if my club spent hundreds of millions to just rely on Carlos Tevez to win us games I'd be extremely disappointed.
But then maybe I'm 'butt-hurt' or 'jealous' of your club; whichever you prefer.
faridmon said:Again, too many strikers.
You forgot about the website..Moobabe said:I simply can't stomach any more of Kermit's posts. No offence - but you're easily one of the worst posters in this thread. You're ignorant, aggressive and your constant attacking of fans whose clubs you deem inferior to own is completely ridiculous.
While I'm no fan of some of the Man Utd posters in here they don't come close to your drivel. Sometimes we try to respect each other's clubs - acknowledge teams who are playing well and who have been successful. Arsenal haven't won anything in 6/7 years - they still play the most attractive football in the league. And if my club spent hundreds of millions to just rely on Carlos Tevez to win us games I'd be extremely disappointed.
But then maybe I'm 'butt-hurt' or 'jealous' of your club; whichever you prefer.
Are they, though? I have talked to lot of Chelsea fans, and they simply adore Kalou, while they say Anelka could be there just because he is an impact sub.BatmanBatmanBatman said:Not if Chelsea finally get rid of Anelka and Kalou.
Well don mate. You are my new hero from now on.Moobabe said:I simply can't stomach any more of Kermit's posts. No offence - but you're easily one of the worst posters in this thread. You're ignorant, aggressive and your constant attacking of fans whose clubs you deem inferior to own is completely ridiculous.
While I'm no fan of some of the Man Utd posters in here they don't come close to your drivel. Sometimes we try to respect each other's clubs - acknowledge teams who are playing well and who have been successful. Arsenal haven't won anything in 6/7 years - they still play the most attractive football in the league. And if my club spent hundreds of millions to just rely on Carlos Tevez to win us games I'd be extremely disappointed.
But then maybe I'm 'butt-hurt' or 'jealous' of your club; whichever you prefer.
farhatraza said:You forgot about the website..
faridmon said:Are they, though? I have talked to lot of Chelsea fans, and they simply adore Kalou, while they say Anelka could be there just because he is an impact sub.
Seep said:Holy shit I forgot about him, where'd he go?
Don't see why you believe that Liverpool won't be able to finish in the top 3. They bought Suarez and Carroll. Played most of the season without Gerrard. Have good potential in youth players, spearing, robinson, etc. They play like a better team since Daglish started to manage them and they beat both united and city. IMO, Won't be suprised if they finish ahead of city.Kermit The Dog said:I tempted to get the 'HE MAD' gif out, but I know you're hurting so I'll leave it. Past success has no relevance to future success. The way City finished last season and the resources at our disposal means we will be fighting it out with United and Chelsea for top spot on the table. Arsenal doesn't have what it takes at the current time, nor do Liverpool or Tottenham. Forget the Top 4, the next few years is going to be all about the Top 3.
My bad =(LabouredSubterfuge said:And you forgot about the sponsor and marketing award.
Wes said:If rumours are to be believed, back to us for £14m. I doubt that though.
In other news, apparently we're getting ready to bid £9m for N'Zogbia.
LabouredSubterfuge said:Good signing if true. I really rate him. Especially if you could knock the twatishness out of him.
The league table doesn't lie, the end-of-season capitulation had become a habit rather than an anomaly, and getting close is no substitute for actually winning the damn thing. Let's not forget that Liverpool finished second, were pretty close themselves, then sold their best midfielder to some Spanish team and dropped out of the Top 4. Oh, and the claim of playing the best football in the league is debatable at best. I saw many boring games involving the Arse last season where your players spent the 90 mins aimlessly passing the ball sideways (only to be undone by a header from a set piece). I believe that other teams who can play a couple of different attacking styles, from the pass and move to the dribble and cross, play much better football than Arsenal.Lightning said:All of this Arsenal bashing in the past few pages is really unjustified. We came really really
close to more than 1 trophy last season. City and Chelsea only finished higher than us because of our capitulation at the end of the season but we showed enough in the league that we are the superior side to City despite them finishing higher than us in the end. I don't want a mass cleanout of our players, we are really close to a winning formula and it's the sole reason why I pray that Arsenal hold onto Fabregas for all he's worth.
Our leaky defence needs to be fixed and a proper backup striker for Van Persie is imo all we really need. Other than that we just need to hold onto our players.
Originally Posted by Kermit The Dog: Forget the Top 4, the next few years is going to be all about the Top 3.
Greyface said:The league table doesn't lie, the end-of-season capitulation had become a habit rather than an anomaly, and getting close is no substitute for actually winning the damn thing. Let's not forget that Liverpool finished second, were pretty close themselves, then sold their best midfielder to some Spanish team and dropped out of the Top 4. Oh, and the claim of playing the best football in the league is debatable at best. I saw many boring games involving the Arse last season where your players spent the 90 mins aimlessly passing the ball sideways (only to be undone by a header from a set piece). I believe that other teams who can play a couple of different attacking styles, from the pass and move to the dribble and cross, play much better football than Arsenal.
Disclaimer: I like Arsenal the least of all the Premiership clubs and do enjoy the schadenfreude when they've crashed and burned in the previous 5 seasons so make of that what you will![]()
Wes said:If rumours are to be believed, back to us for £14m. I doubt that though.
In other news, apparently we're getting ready to bid £9m for N'Zogbia.
Well, if your standards are merely qualifying for the champions league then of course you had a great season. Spurs would be oh so happy to be in your place. Of course, some might argue that Arsenal is a big club, 3rd most successful in the history of English football (second at the time Wenger joined) and given the resources at their disposal and the prices they charge their fans, and should be winning trophies every other season as befits their status. (those people are fools and know nothing about football of course.)near said:I disagree. I think a team can have a good season even if they're trophy-less in the end. Fair enough Arsenal have disrupted good form and as a consequence sold there title chances, however they played good football for prolonged periods of the season which enabled them to lead the table at times, they demonstrated they can go head-to-head with the arguably the best team in the world - Barcelona - by beating them with what was one of the most entertaining comebacks of the season. They challenged for the quadruple at the later stages of each competition and at one point seriously looked as though it could have been there year. To suddenly disregard such strives for 2 weeks of football which had them knocked out of most competitions does not equate to a poor season. Need I say it: I'm a Spurs born lover.
farhatraza said:The thing is, that final step that gets you over the line, in my opinion, is the biggest step of all. So whilst Arsenal were oh so near...they were yet so far. They bottled games in March for example...the pressure by the end of April and May is higher still...
Greyface said:Well, if your standards are merely qualifying for the champions league then of course you had a great season. Spurs would be oh so happy to be in your place. Of course, some might argue that Arsenal is a big club, 3rd most successful in the history of English football (second at the time Wenger joined) and given the resources at their disposal and the prices they charge their fans, and should be winning trophies every other season as befits their status. (those people are fools and know nothing about football of course.)
That's true, I suppose it's just what was shaping up to be such a promising and successful campaign floundered so it's now looked at in that context. There's just this inevitability about Arsenal letting it all slip through their hands if you know what I mean..near said:I agree. But I think its slightly unfair to call there 10/11 campaign poor because they finished trophy-less, yet it was mismanagement towards the end of the season that really damaged there good effort for most of the season.
farhatraza said:As for now, the rumours of losing Nasri and Cesc is what's driving the negativity towards Arsenal. If that money is used well though they could be a better team than last year, we'll find out!
farhatraza said:That's true, I suppose it's just what was shaping up to be such a promising and successful campaign floundered so it's now looked at in that context. There's just this inevitability about Arsenal letting it all slip through their hands if you know what I mean..
As for now, the rumours of losing Nasri and Cesc is what's driving the negativity towards Arsenal. If that money is used well though they could be a better team than last year, we'll find out!
I don't agree. While you are correct that getting close is no substitute for winning it showed just how close we really are and mass changes are not neccessary. Man City and Chelsea only over took us in the last 4 weeks of the season where for majority part we were the much better side. In the case of Man City who I think are a long way from being successful despite finishing 3rd and the FA cup. Man City want to succeed by going into games with the purpose of not losing and just playing out boring draws. They are a totally negative side who can only achieve anything by trying to buy it.Greyface said:The league table doesn't lie, the end-of-season capitulation had become a habit rather than an anomaly, and getting close is no substitute for actually winning the damn thing. Let's not forget that Liverpool finished second, were pretty close themselves, then sold their best midfielder to some Spanish team and dropped out of the Top 4. Oh, and the claim of playing the best football in the league is debatable at best. I saw many boring games involving the Arse last season where your players spent the 90 mins aimlessly passing the ball sideways (only to be undone by a header from a set piece). I believe that other teams who can play a couple of different attacking styles, from the pass and move to the dribble and cross, play much better football than Arsenal.
Disclaimer: I like Arsenal the least of all the Premiership clubs and do enjoy the schadenfreude when they've crashed and burned in the previous 5 seasons so make of that what you will![]()
And this is what Arsenal should really be preventing. The problem is Nasri is not worth the wages he is demanding and Clichy' heart just isn't at Arsenal anymore.near said:The transfer situation they're under right now is unbelievable to be honest. At a season where the board and Arsene are really being pushed by fans to sign players, there very own want out. Shame really.
But that's the problem many Arsenal fans have with the team--there has been a very visible lack of effort from certain players especially towards the end of the season. You can't say Arsenal gave their best effort throughout the season.near said:No ones stating that there ambitions were to merely qualify for CL, as they had actually competed very well for the league for the majority of the season - I'm pretty sure Arsene was disappointed to not have one the PL. However that doesn't necessarily define the campaign as poor. They were unsuccessful in achieving trophies, yes, but we should not necessarily disqualify there efforts.
Greyface said:But that's the problem many Arsenal fans have with the team--there has been a very visible lack of effort from certain players especially towards the end of the season. You can't say Arsenal gave their best effort throughout the season.
Watch Wenger blow all the money on young boys. You know he wants to, you know he's going to.farhatraza said:If that money is used well though they could be a better team than last year, we'll find out!
Greyface said:But that's the problem many Arsenal fans have with the team--there has been a very visible lack of effort from certain players especially towards the end of the season. You can't say Arsenal gave their best effort throughout the season.
Lightning said:And this is what Arsenal should really be preventing. The problem is Nasri is not worth the wages he is demanding and Clichy' heart just isn't at Arsenal anymore.
I'm sure Fabregas can be persuaded to stay another year if Wenger tries hard enough.
Fabregas at 110,000-120,000 I believe.near said:Who's the highest paid player at Arsenal? And what are his wages? Do we know? I'm curious because I know Arsenal love to cut corners with expenditure.
Lightning said:Fabregas at 110,000-120,000 I believe.
Top post mate, needed saying.Moobabe said:I simply can't stomach any more of Kermit's posts. No offence - but you're easily one of the worst posters in this thread. You're ignorant, aggressive and your constant attacking of fans whose clubs you deem inferior to own is completely ridiculous.
While I'm no fan of some of the Man Utd posters in here they don't come close to your drivel. Sometimes we try to respect each other's clubs - acknowledge teams who are playing well and who have been successful. Arsenal haven't won anything in 6/7 years - they still play the most attractive football in the league. And if my club spent hundreds of millions to just rely on Carlos Tevez to win us games I'd be extremely disappointed.
But then maybe I'm 'butt-hurt' or 'jealous' of your club; whichever you prefer.
near said:Damn. I thought it'd be in the region of £80,000 - 98,000 never expected it to exceed that. He is totally not worth those salaries, but I guess its the price they paid to keep in-demand potential. If Nasri is demanding more than that or similar I think Arsene will just let him go, I know I would.
They're just boosting the price. Cesc won't play for them. Esp not when he knows Barca are in for him.Zibrahim said:As of this post, Real Madrid have entered race for Cesc Fabregas.
It is understood that Real value the player at 50million (£45m), which is far closer to Arsenal's asking price than Barcelona have reached.
![]()
Zibrahim said:As of this post, Real Madrid have entered race for Cesc Fabregas.
It is understood that Real value the player at 50million (£45m), which is far closer to Arsenal's asking price than Barcelona have reached.
![]()
Zibrahim said:As of this post, Real Madrid have entered race for Cesc Fabregas.
It is understood that Real value the player at 50million (£45m), which is far closer to Arsenal's asking price than Barcelona have reached.
I can't see Fabregas going to Madrid.He's a Catalan who wants to play for his boyhood team.It seems more like a 'stop Barca at all costs' attempt from Madrid.They may be starting to worry about another Barca league procession next season.
Moobabe said:I simply can't stomach any more of Kermit's posts. No offence - but you're easily one of the worst posters in this thread. You're ignorant, aggressive and your constant attacking of fans whose clubs you deem inferior to own is completely ridiculous.
While I'm no fan of some of the Man Utd posters in here they don't come close to your drivel. Sometimes we try to respect each other's clubs - acknowledge teams who are playing well and who have been successful. Arsenal haven't won anything in 6/7 years - they still play the most attractive football in the league. And if my club spent hundreds of millions to just rely on Carlos Tevez to win us games I'd be extremely disappointed.
But then maybe I'm 'butt-hurt' or 'jealous' of your club; whichever you prefer.
Clegg said:Zibrahim said:As of this post, Real Madrid have entered race for Cesc Fabregas.
It is understood that Real value the player at 50million (£45m), which is far closer to Arsenal's asking price than Barcelona have reached.
I can't see Fabregas going to Madrid.He's a Catalan who wants to play for his boyhood team.It seems more like a 'stop Barca at all costs' attempt from Madrid.They may be starting to worry about another Barca league procession next season.
I can't either but the offer is right there and it's what his people are asking for. This is hilarious on Real's part though. Even if they did get him I don't really think he would play that much.
Zibrahim said:Whats funny is the fact that Madrid got an absolute bargain signing Sahin for 8m and now they want to spunk another 45m on a player they don't even need.Save the money and integrate Sahin into the team instead ffs.Clegg said:I can't either but the offer is right there and it's what his people are asking for. This is hilarious on Real's part though. Even if they did get him I don't really think he would play that much.
Edit:It says that Chelsea are only monitoring the Nasri situation.Boas will try to sign Moutinho before Nasri.Also if Nasri had any sense he would stay a million miles away from City.
Kweh said:
Clegg said:Zibrahim said:Whats funny is the fact that Madrid got an absolute bargain signing Sahin for 8m and now they want to spunk another 45m on a player they don't even need.Save the money and integrate Sahin into the team instead ffs.
They always do this though lol
lolClegg said:Whats funny is the fact that Madrid got an absolute bargain signing Sahin for 8m and now they want to spunk another 45m on a player they don't even need.Save the money and integrate Sahin into the team instead ffs.
YES!Kweh said:
Hell fucking YES!Zibrahim said:As of this post, Real Madrid have entered race for Cesc Fabregas.
It is understood that Real value the player at 50million (£45m), which is far closer to Arsenal's asking price than Barcelona have reached.
ROFL!Zibrahim said:
Barclays Premier League 2011/2012 (League Winner)
Man Utd 7/4
Chelsea 5/2
Man C 7/2
Arsnal 8/1
L'pool 10/1
Spurs 50/1