"Arsenal striker Van Persie is one of the best in the world" says Manchester City forward Aguero.
Foreplay before the season starts.
Only God Knows.
"Arsenal striker Van Persie is one of the best in the world" says Manchester City forward Aguero.
Foreplay before the season starts.
The law has been passed, have to accept it.
I still don't believe Terry's defence...I think he called Anton Ferdinand a "fucking black cunt" and I don't think he was being sarcastic. But if it can't be proved then it can't be proved and that's just how the law works.
The FA have a massive problem now, after the Suarez case, what do they do?
I don't see the point in these conversations. People had their minds made up. So no mater what the verdict, those who don't like him will say he's guilty. However, the court found that he wasn't so that's that.and OJ is innocent too right
I don't know how to feel, after some extended youtube research, about Powell slotting into the first team squad/being talked about like a bench prospect right from the off.
They scouted him for a hell of a lot of games, I guess. And I'm confident it's not going to be a Bébé drowning-in-the-deep-end humiliation. But if you're "looking to develop into a CM", you've got to play there. And the middle of the park for Manchester United is not a place to learn your trade: you need to pretty much know what you're doing.
The law has been passed, have to accept it.
I still don't believe Terry's defence...I think he called Anton Ferdinand a "fucking black cunt" and I don't think he was being sarcastic. But if it can't be proved then it can't be proved and that's just how the law works.
The FA have a massive problem now, after the Suarez case, what do they do?
I don't see the point in these conversations. People had their minds made up. So no mater what the verdict, those who don't like him will say he's guilty. However, the court found that he wasn't so that's that.
People need to let their personal feelings go. Not liking the verdict doesn't invalidate it.
There are those who go through the system and get away with crimes, there are those who go through and get convicted but who are guilty of nothing. It happens. Whether this was the former only John Terry knows. All I do know is a better educated and informed man than myself or anybody else on this forum made the decision, and he says not guilty.
You can't use that one case to argue that all judgments are wrong.
Did you mean this to sound so ironic?I don't know if you're trolling or just thick in general,
They do what they're supposed to. Let him off with some sort of 'disrepute' fine or something. After all, he's John Terry, Captain, Leader etc. etc. Only dirty foreigners can actually be racists didn't you know? /FAspokesman
If they don't ban the fuck out of him on the 'balance of probabilities' I'm going to fucking rage. Seriously, I will be mad as hell. Our FA have a chance to prove they're not as corrupt and shite as FIFA here, bet they don't take it.
:lol :lol :lolI don't know if you're trolling or just thick in general, but you could always go to a black person and say what John Terry said to Anton Ferdinand.
Then come back and tell me the results.
You're right, I'll just use that one case to argue that this judgement is wrong.
I don't see the point in these conversations. People had their minds made up. So no mater what the verdict, those who don't like him will say he's guilty. However, the court found that he wasn't so that's that.
People need to let their personal feelings go. Not liking the verdict doesn't invalidate it.
There are those who go through the system and get away with crimes, there are those who go through and get convicted but who are guilty of nothing. It happens. Whether this was the former only John Terry knows. All I do know is a better educated and informed man than myself or anybody else on this forum made the decision, and he says not guilty.
Can't believe he's still tappin Irina Shayk... Thought he'd be onto another supermodel by now.
I don't see the point in these conversations. People had their minds made up. So no mater what the verdict, those who don't like him will say he's guilty. However, the court found that he wasn't so that's that.
People need to let their personal feelings go. Not liking the verdict doesn't invalidate it.
There are those who go through the system and get away with crimes, there are those who go through and get convicted but who are guilty of nothing. It happens. Whether this was the former only John Terry knows. All I do know is a better educated and informed man than myself or anybody else on this forum made the decision, and he says not guilty.
To be honest, it's got nothing to do with personal feelings. In my eyes there's a video that shows Terry has racially abused someone, and that a sarcastic tone isn't evident in that video.
The unseen footage may be wildly different but until that surfaces I've got every right to go on what I've got.
I can't remember how the Gerrard assault case went exactly a few years ago, but I remember thinking he got off very lightly as evidence pointed to the opposite decision (correct me if I'm wrong). I feel the same with this going on what has been provided to me.
THIS.In a case such as this, its the lawyers who determine the victory, not the actual alleged crime. The better lawyers won, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was the correct verdict.
Pretty random and I don't know if it was posted already. Chicharito vs De Gea
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYhYy8L7mCA&feature=player_embedded
Anderson weight check. Opinions ?
Why this one in particular?
Gerrard wouldn't do such a terrible thing
Portly.
Oh, we're back to Suarez/Evra again.
Wonderful.
They do what they're supposed to. Let him off with some sort of 'disrepute' fine or something. After all, he's John Terry, Captain, Leader etc. etc. Only dirty foreigners can actually be racists didn't you know? /FAspokesman
If they don't ban the fuck out of him on the 'balance of probabilities' I'm going to fucking rage. Seriously, I will be mad as hell. Our FA have a chance to prove they're not as corrupt and shite as FIFA here, bet they don't take it.
To be honest, it's got nothing to do with personal feelings. In my eyes there's a video that shows Terry has racially abused someone, and that a sarcastic tone isn't evident in that video.
The unseen footage may be wildly different but until that surfaces I've got every right to go on what I've got.
I can't remember how the Gerrard assault case went exactly a few years ago, but I remember thinking he got off very lightly as evidence pointed to the opposite decision (correct me if I'm wrong). I feel the same with this going on what has been provided to me.
It's relevant if the FA refuse to charge Terry. Since Terry doesn't deny using racist language and the FA ruled that context is irrelevant, his ban must be at least eight games. If the FA don't charge him and ban him, then Liverpool and Suarez should sue the FA MASSIVELY for damages etc.
I mean, there's video evidence here for god's sake.
Can't believe he's still tappin Irina Shayk... Thought he'd be onto another supermodel by now.
Eh... I could reply to you, the biggest nonsense poster in footyGAF, but I think Arnie has it covered.I don't know if you're trolling or just thick in general, but you could always go to a black person and say what John Terry said to Anton Ferdinand.
Then come back and tell me the results.
.Did you mean this to sound so ironic?
Fair enough, but when a judge comes out and decides he doesn't feel the evidence is strong enough, and that there's too many missing pieces, it just comes across as sour grapes.To be honest, it's got nothing to do with personal feelings. In my eyes there's a video that shows Terry has racially abused someone, and that a sarcastic tone isn't evident in that video.
The unseen footage may be wildly different but until that surfaces I've got every right to go on what I've got.
I can't remember how the Gerrard assault case went exactly a few years ago, but I remember thinking he got off very lightly as evidence pointed to the opposite decision (correct me if I'm wrong). I feel the same with this going on what has been provided to me.
Doesn't make it incorrect.I don't know which I want to bang more.
In a case such as this, its the lawyers who determine the victory, not the actual alleged crime. The better lawyers won, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was the correct verdict.
Aww, the Terry verdict has totally taken attention away from Rangers being dumped in Div 3.
It's relevant if the FA refuse to charge Terry. Since Terry doesn't deny using racist language and the FA ruled that context is irrelevant, his ban must be at least eight games. If the FA don't charge him and ban him, then Liverpool and Suarez should sue the FA MASSIVELY for damages etc.
I mean, there's video evidence here for god's sake.
Tactical beard for chins.
It's relevant if the FA refuse to charge Terry. Since Terry doesn't deny using racist language and the FA ruled that context is irrelevant, his ban must be at least eight games. If the FA don't charge him and ban him, then Liverpool and Suarez should sue the FA MASSIVELY for damages etc.
I mean, there's video evidence here for god's sake.
Eh... I could reply to you, the biggest nonsense poster in footyGAF, but I think Arnie has it covered.
The FA probably won't be able to do anything to him now. They can't be seen to undermine the courts.
He's just trying to hide his swag lest someone tries to buy him. This is his year.
Maybe.
Holy fuck did the FA say context is irrelevant? Hahahahaha
And yeah I remember Gerrard lamping that bloke and thinking that's straight assault, but as you say first time offenders.
Well the butt-hurt are out in force. I'm out till this place calms down. Think I'll take the motorcycle for a spin.
Who's the nonsense poster now?