And? Is there some relevance to there being any irony?He did say Americans should accept a few deaths a year in favor of the 2nd amendment.
Well that changes everything!
I'm sure the Democrat party and media machine will put out that he was a republican, or the story will simply be buried to hide the shooters leanings and motivations. It's textbook and we've seen it before.You wouldn't be assuming who (and even applying the murderer status to a whole lot of folks) killed him without any evidence whatsoever now, would you?
You must be hard of thinking with a take like that.Why are college campuses any specific "turf" being pretty much anyone from any background can be a student (and later professor) >_>
Here is some context. Three high school kids in Colorado have been shot the same day yet in another senseless shooting. Just another *day.We get it, you don't understand context.
Well that changes everything!
The beauty of Bluesky is that bubble lets those psychos to show what they really are.
Let them celebrate, it's their opinion. It doesn't affect me if they spout their stupidity out into the world. Freedom of speech cannot be a one way street. It has to exist for everyone and every opinion under the sun. Acting on it is another matter entirely.You would fight for the right for people to celebrate political violence towards you?
I don't agree with cancelling. If I avoid someone and realise what I don't want to turn into, I withdraw my attention, that is all. They can go on living their life, voicing their opinion, just without my attention. They are not cancelled, I am merely walking away from them.You do know cancelled doesn't refer to killing, right? Outside of the beginning of your post, you are completely agreeing with cancelling. By cancelling they are saying the repercussions should be no longer purchasing their products, thus avoiding them like you said.
As for the people that find their behavior abhorrent but are making excuses to buy their products because of the large teams involved, that's a cop out and you know it. You're giving people like this an out every single time they do something disgusting. Would you you that excuse if you found out 8 out of 200 developers on a game were hardcore pedophiles and we're proud of it? Remember, other people would be collateral damage in that scenario as well.
I can only assume these people are rounded up and fired today.
Sucker Punch, make that happen.
Again this binary, separating an artists from the art there is different when an artist who once did something awful and has stopped (usually because they are dead) and artists currently advocating you be shot in the neck so they can gleefully dance on your grave.I've explained this at length. I firmly believe in separating art from the artist and I don't hold the majority responsible for the actions or thoughts of a few. I also want this person to face actions for this stupid social media post.
Yeah, nobody should be cheering political assassinations. That's pretty disgusting. Political violence in general shows great radicalization of society.There is zero correlation between arguments for and against gun ownership and 2nd amendment rights, and not deploring black-clad snipers assassinating public figures.
Even countries with strict laws on handguns, tend to allow for hunting rifles, so logically there's no basis for "irony".
More to the point though, anyone who supports politically motivated murder is a danger to a civil society and should be dealt with as such by the lawfully elected government.
This is not defensible as a free speech issue.
The Bald Man is on the case
I want the person in question to be fired, but I simple don't adhere to moral essentialism or collective blame.Again this binary, separating an artists from the art there is different when an artist who once did something awful and has stopped (usually because they are dead) and artists currently advocating you be shot in the neck so they can gleefully dance on your grave.
If it is acceptable to celebrate political violence towards you, are you more or less likely to be a victim of political violence?Let them celebrate, it's their opinion. It doesn't affect me if they spout their stupidity out into the world. Freedom of speech cannot be a one way street. It has to exist for everyone and every opinion under the sun. Acting on it is another matter entirely.
Good point.You made be right but Social Media has given them access to a place where they find other people of the same degree which encouraged them to double down on their behavior or opinions no matter how bad or dangerous that way of thinking can be.
Using myself as example I purposely only stick to Video Game places like Reset Era, NeoGaf, Reddit pages and the GameFaqs forums when I use the Internet and I purposely avoid sharing my thoughts and opinions on real life matters because those things are mine to keep. Heck you wouldn't even find a single real life picture of me on the Internet because I never uploaded one and my family has refused to do so at my behest. I would delete my Facebook account without hesitation in a second if it wasn't for my family keeping in contact with me the through messager app but I haven't used the website itself in years.
Social Media didn't start out as a bad idea but I feel like people on those platforms have gotten addicted to the constant social engagement and now we have a cesspool of people trying to climb over each other because they can't stand the thought of being wrong or not having the last laugh.
Doesn't matter, really.What's the whole quote? Full context, not just a snippet that played on its own sounds terrible. I bet it's not as simple as you say.
stop me if i am wrong on this one ... (hey, probably am, i dont know)
So there are a portion of people celebrating Charlie's assassination (which is horrible) and from what I have read online, the general consensus is action/reaction with these people. Charlie said blah blah blah so he deserved to die blah blah blah (again horrible)
So if these Devs lose their jobs over their actions (by posting that online) is that not the exact same as what they were doing? But I am sure they would see that as different right?
(The mental gymnastics is enough to give someone a headache to be honest)
Give a list of Disney's products that were made by proud pedophiles and I'll stop supporting that product. People here are avoiding Sucker Punch's next product for their actions, not taking the illogical next step of avoiding everything by Sony.Let them celebrate, it's their opinion. It doesn't affect me if they spout their stupidity out into the world. Freedom of speech cannot be a one way street. It has to exist for everyone and every opinion under the sun. Acting on it is another matter entirely.
I don't agree with cancelling. If I avoid someone and realise what I don't want to turn into, I withdraw my attention, that is all. They can go on living their life, voicing their opinion, just without my attention. They are not cancelled, I am merely walking away from them.
Cancelling in the culture it exists in today is far more than just other people avoiding the people they don't like. Do you really think people like JK Rowling are just avoided by the people who tried to cancel her?
If people want to stop to support a product if one of a thousand of the people involved behave in a way they don't condone that is their right.
The example with the pedophiles you gave is a good one. You wouldn't be able to consume the majority of media or products in todays world if the stance is don't consume if a pedophile is involved. You can go live in the woods and write your own story, as sad as it is. Just take Disney as an example. If you watch any of their stuff, you're supporting the creation of more "collateral damage" as you called it
more likelyIf it is acceptable to celebrate political violence towards you, are you more or less likely to be a victim of political violence?
This is pretty pathetic. It takes dozens of people to make a game and if one does something you don't like, you hate them all. Um Ok.Well I won't be touching their titles anymore.
I won't make a list, just mention everthing James Gunn is involved in as an example. There is more to find, regardless of people shouting 'conspiracy theory' whenever topics like these are mentioned.Give a list of Disney's products that were made by proud pedophiles and I'll stop supporting that product. People here are avoiding Sucker Punch's next product for their actions, not taking the illogical next step of avoiding everything by Sony.
This is pretty pathetic. It takes dozens of people to make a game and if one does something you don't like, you hate them all. Um Ok.
It absolutely does.Doesn't matter, really.
This is pretty pathetic. It takes dozens of people to make a game and if one does something you don't like, you hate them all. Um Ok.
There is no moral essentialist argument being made. What if they don't fire them, what do you do then? Do you just shrug and continue to support them as they advocate for murder?I want the person in question to be fired, but I simple don't adhere to moral essentialism or collective blame.
I think they would probably only have a case if they could show the company accepted similar speech from employees from the other side of the political spectrum.Terminating anyone of these people whilst sensible, is probably exactly what they want to happen. Then they can argue free speech and the second amendment as a reason to sue the employer.
So fucking what?He did say Americans should accept a few deaths a year in favor of the 2nd amendment.
Other than some offensive joke tweets, I'm not familiar with anything terrible done by James Gunn. I'm not a fan of his politics, but I've enjoyed stuff he's done in the past.I won't make a list, just mention everthing James Gunn is involved in as an example. There is more to find, regardless of people shouting 'conspiracy theory' whenever topics like these are mentioned.
and you're right. There is a difference between stopping the support of a product vs the entire company. Or part of a team directly involved in creating a game vs the parent company.
It absolutely does.
If during a speech somebody said, "I was told by a rude man that all women are psychotic, so I argued back to make him see his ways" and then someone posted out of context that in a speech somebody said "all women are psychotic" it sure makes context matter.
Do you understand that if Sucker Punch dont make an statement apologizing for this situation, then it makes them look as if they are supporting the ideas of these developers?
Are you seriously this dense that you dont see the whole picture here?
It matters, but I will say that while Killjoy paraphrased it, he did not misrepresent the position.It absolutely does.
No.Do you understand that if Sucker Punch dont make an statement apologizing for this situation, then it makes them look as if they are supporting the ideas of these developers?
I never said anything about what he deserves or not.So fucking what?
That's justification for him to be shot?
Can you hear yourself? Any insight in there?
If you can't comprehend that words shouldn't mean you are shot, then what on earth are you getting at exactly?
If you're really advocating a world where people, like Charlie, should be shot on a premise of simple debate then fuck me, what's the point here?
That's an abhorrent point of view to have. What you're advocating here is a world where if you don't like what people have to say you have full rights to not think critically and just outright kill someone on your complete lack of reasoning..
You really want to live in that world?
I guarantee you don't.