• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife trailer

#Phonepunk#

Banned
I’ve seen a lot of YouTube/social media reactions say it feels too much like Stranger Things, but other being focused on kids and sharing an actor, what similarities exist?
i mean, im mostly curious as to why that's framed as a bad thing. don't people in general love or at least really like Stranger Things?

besides if there is a tv show to copy, you could do a lot worse you know. the last movie looked like a SNL skit and that's about the level of quality it had. id much rather have a GB movie patterned about ST than SNL.
 
Last edited:

TGO

Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
Agree with most in here, I always said if they made Ghostbusters 2016 in the same style with Adam Sandler, Martin Lawrence, Ben Stiller and Will Ferrell then it would have been received and bombed exactly the same. Ghostbusters 2016 was made for a specific target audience and relied on enticing those with strong nostalgic memories to buy in on the brand. And it failed, because the brand was disrespected. Ironically a lot of the same people are now complining because of the 'kids' cast. Let's call all these people anti-natalists, the bastards!!!

After watching this trailer, the era we live in is Stranger Things, hell even IT is only a 15 certificate. Movies are trying to appeal to the largest cross generation of cinema goers on a common theme. Although I think ST comparison is largely based on the same kid and a 'creepy' setting. The new trailer seems to have some honest attempts at homages while also reinventing the formula. With the lack of a true sequel of the original cast, this is probably the best we will get. I think this trailer was set early in the movie and was just teasing the tone and formula of the film.

That reddit plot leak seems to be stacking up tho.....


Yet no one knows who the Ghostbusters are...
 
Last edited:
This is as close to the original creators as we are going to get. Its not going to be what I want... probably not. But, what do we want?

I just want the movie to be good.

Bonus unrelated personal pic :messenger_winking:
BA6uUnl.jpg
 
That gunner’s seat is fucking badass. I don’t care what anyone says.

I seem to remember the toy ecto1 from the early 90s had this so it's great to see it and a great now to the history

There will be lots of subtle ticks to the original I think....I'm pretty sure u got a glimpse of slimer in the trailer and the leg on Paul Rudd car looked like a zool doggie
 

nkarafo

Member
Looks a lot better than Ghostbusters 2016.
Well, that's not hard to achieve though. I think it would be impossible to not look better.

My issue is that it looks as if it takes itself too seriously. Doesn't look like a comedy, it looks too sentimental and melancholic. IMO Ghostbusters was great because it was so funny, not because it had a deep story or something.

And i didn't like Stranger Things much either and other than Paul Rudd there isn't anything for me here.

But if all they wanted is a better movie than GB 2016 i guess they achieved it.
 

quickwhips

Member
I'm not sure yet. And I never really like the "forgotten into myth" thing these movies do. Kids 10 years from now will know what happened on 9/11. Schools will teach it. They'd teach a ghost invasion that threatened all of mankind too :messenger_tears_of_joy:

They were already doing this by Ghostbusters 2, making it even worse. But, whatever. My actual problem is whether or not I want to watch a movie that seems to clearly feature kids for 90% of the runtime.
Stand by me, gremlins, flight of the navigator, mac and me, jaws 2. I stand by the last two. How could i forget Goonies and monster squad.
 
Last edited:

nkarafo

Member
Stand by me, gremlins, flight of the navigator, mac and me, jaws 2. I stand by the last two. How could i forget Goonies and monster squad.
These were originally movies written with kids in mind. Though, Gremlins isn't really about kids.

Ghostbusters was a movie about a bunch of loser adults trying to make business with their crazy idea. Plus, it was these characters and their chemistry that carried the movie. The ghosts, the effects, the story, etc, was just background noise.
 

Doom85

Member
Don't know if I like the idea of kids and possibly their mom being the new team. I assumed the new cast of characters would be either older teenagers or college-age, a reasonable age for the original Ghostbusters to show them the ropes. Considering how heavy the proto-packs are supposed to be, it's going to look ridiculous to see kids running around with them strapped to their backs. I know people hate the 2016 film, but at least it had adults as the team plus the more slapstick style of comedy didn't bother me since it was an entirely new cast (whereas Ghostbusters 2 going more slapstick felt out of place since it was the OG team, but 2 had a fuck ton of problems that just killed any of its good elements for me).

The gunner seat is cool though. And Paul Rudd looks like he'll be a win. Though how the Ghostbusters' feats aren't common knowledge is beyond me, stopping massive monstrosities and proving the supernatural is real isn't something that should be forgotten even 30 years later. And I swear if they pull that beyond fucking stupid "the government convinced everyone it was a hoax despite the MASSIVE amount of evidence that would instantly rip apart such a claim" bullshit that 2 did, I'm not going to be happy.

Also, Egon must have gotten a woman pregnant sometime around the timeline of 1 and 2 for the mom's son to be that age. Which just feels odd to think about since it's EGON, yeah he had the romance with Janine but I assumed it never went that far (still better her with Egon than Louis. I heard people be all, "but she had no chemistry with Egon!" and I'm screaming, "no shit, that was the joke!"), but we'll see how the movie addresses it.

It could be good, I'm just not particularly wowed by this teaser.
 
what i was hoping for with this is that in tone, it would align with the first ghostbusters

the original movie didn't care about conveying mystery

the ghostbusters job was as legit and as mundane as any other job, no mystique

like yes, ghosts, there's one in my bathroom, please come clean it up so i can move on with my life thank you, and the humor would come with the process of the job

these guys were out to solve a practical problem like they were a fucken cleaning service that aren't enthusiastic about their jobs and that's why it was HILARIOUS

this right here is just stranger things inheriting the ghostbusters lore

really wanted to like this but i'm sorry
 
Last edited:

sol_bad

Member
It looks fine, nothing to be excited about yet. It was just a teaser though. Was great hearing the ECO-1's siren though.
 
oh man imagine a ghostbusters union based movie lol

ghosts running rampant in NYC because ghostbusters are refusing to work and holding a strike

interesting starting point imo
 

DiscoJer

Member
The problem is that the surviving Ghostbusters are 67, 69, and 74. And they were comedians, not action stars to begin with. Unless you want something like BubbaHotep, set in a nursing home, a Ghostbusters sequel is not going to star them.

At least this seems to be a passing the torch thing.
 
Last edited:

teh_pwn

"Saturated fat causes heart disease as much as Brawndo is what plants crave."
Looks like a serviceable summer popcorn flick. And it's not yet another marvel movie so that's a plus.
 

cryptoadam

Banned
Watched the trailer, does not look good.

When I think Ghostbusters I think a COMEDY with cool effects. Where was the COMEDY in this trailer? I was expecting Paul Rudd and Seth Rogan or some shit. Even if you wanted to have kids fine but make them FUNNY, and make Paul Rudd FUNNY.

It could be the trailer is misdirection, but if its going to come off as some super serious coming of age story with only a few jokes sprinkled in bleh.

I think they might be holding back showing the originals, because the title is called AFTERLIFE, while that makes me think that we are going to get ghosts from the AFTERLIFE, and it would be perfect to have the originals as ghosts. How about Egon and Rey are dead and come back in ghost form, heck get the guys who voiced them on the cartoon if you have to LOL.

So this better be one of those trailers that don't capture the real tone of the movie because right now this does not feel like GB at all and more like they had a script and attached GB for nostalgia purposes to it.
 

quickwhips

Member
I hope the original ghostbusters come back.. maybe with Rick Moranis taking over Harold Ramis' role. I know Moranis retired from acting but its Ghostbusters for christ's sake!

Also, the 2016 film was good.
Wasnt he on goldbergs recently for spaceballs.
 

oagboghi2

Member
Don't know if I like the idea of kids and possibly their mom being the new team. I assumed the new cast of characters would be either older teenagers or college-age, a reasonable age for the original Ghostbusters to show them the ropes. Considering how heavy the proto-packs are supposed to be, it's going to look ridiculous to see kids running around with them strapped to their backs. I know people hate the 2016 film, but at least it had adults as the team plus the more slapstick style of comedy didn't bother me since it was an entirely new cast (whereas Ghostbusters 2 going more slapstick felt out of place since it was the OG team, but 2 had a fuck ton of problems that just killed any of its good elements for me).

The gunner seat is cool though. And Paul Rudd looks like he'll be a win. Though how the Ghostbusters' feats aren't common knowledge is beyond me, stopping massive monstrosities and proving the supernatural is real isn't something that should be forgotten even 30 years later. And I swear if they pull that beyond fucking stupid "the government convinced everyone it was a hoax despite the MASSIVE amount of evidence that would instantly rip apart such a claim" bullshit that 2 did, I'm not going to be happy.

Also, Egon must have gotten a woman pregnant sometime around the timeline of 1 and 2 for the mom's son to be that age. Which just feels odd to think about since it's EGON, yeah he had the romance with Janine but I assumed it never went that far (still better her with Egon than Louis. I heard people be all, "but she had no chemistry with Egon!" and I'm screaming, "no shit, that was the joke!"), but we'll see how the movie addresses it.

It could be good, I'm just not particularly wowed by this teaser.
go to your local middle school and ask some 6th graders to explain 9/11. See what happens.

People don't know what they don't know
 
Not really feeling it from the trailer.
Too much stick, not enough carrot.

I'll be entertained by the predictable media stances as per Alita and Joker in the meantime.

I didn't mind Ghostbusters 2016. Aside from all the shitty commentary prior and denials and shitty commentary after.
2.5/5 movie. Hemsworth was fantastic.
 

autoduelist

Member
I still stand by my point.
It had sliming incidents as well and a woman getting sucked into a fridge but most of the fun stuff was in the dialogue and it's one of those films that could be taken 100% serious if you let it.
It's not an outright comedy in my opinion.

2016 was a full on comedy but a bad one.

It was definitely a comedy. It was snl megastars, written by snl and sctv alums behind movies like caddyshack, stripes, and animal house.

'Taken 100% serious'? Nah. No way. It was written as a comedy, written by comedians, starring comedians. Everybody knew they were going to see a comedy. Everybody was laughing their asses off in the theater.

A few scenes, like the fridge, don't change that.
 
Last edited:

Grinchy

Banned
Stand by me, gremlins, flight of the navigator, mac and me, jaws 2. I stand by the last two. How could i forget Goonies and monster squad.

I like a lot of those movies. I'm not sure if I can say it resonated with my parents.

That's the difference between seeing kids movies as a kid and seeing them as an adult. That's the only reason I feel like I may not like this. Some movies starring kids come out really fucking well like The Florida Project and that's not even a movie for kids.
 

Airola

Member
I didn't mind Ghostbusters 2016. Aside from all the shitty commentary prior and denials and shitty commentary after.
2.5/5 movie. Hemsworth was fantastic.

That's pretty much my take on it too. It was an ok movie. Hemsworth was really funny in it. And to my surprise, based on the trailers I initially thought Leslie Jones and that chubby blonde woman who always screams in every movie she is in (and whose name I for some reason don't remember now) would be really annoying but both of them ended up being way less obnoxious than was show in the trailer. If someone annoyed me at some point it was the "female Egon" for some reason. But all in all it was an ok movie. I remember next to nothing about it but it managed to entertain me for its full length. A solid 2,5/5 movie.

I would love to see that movie addressed in some form in the new movie. Like maybe show a glimpse of an alternative universe and have a short comedy scene with people being "wait what, what the hell" until the rip between the universes closes. That could've been a nice scene in Ghostbusters 2016 too but as it didn't have anything like that, maybe do something like that in this movie. At least Ghostbusters 2016 had cameos of some of the original cast to connect the previous movies to that so I don't see any reason to at least in some way own up the last movie and include something of it in some form.
 

xrnzaaas

Member
Aren't there any talented kids other the ones from Stranger Things? It feels like if there's a new big movie with minors in the cast at least one of them will be starring.

And don't get me wrong, I'm glad we're getting this over another female Ghostbusters disaster.
 

Fret Runner

Member
Just had a horrible daydream.
The film ends, the credits roll, I'm sat there thinking "hey, that was kinda good :)"
Then the after credits scene plays.
It shows a portal and looking through the other side are......*shudders* The 2016 circus act cast.
The loud illiterate one, whos tweets look like they were typed by a hyper dog, says "looks like there's nobody here. think I should call out?" The others then stare at the camara and say in unison "but who are you going to call?" Then the film ends
I then die inside and go get my money back.
 

Fret Runner

Member
Imagine how fucking cringe the questions at the press tour are gonna be.

The woke an broke brigade will purposefully kamikaze their interviews to score npc level up points.

“but what about the women of 2016?!”
“What about women?!”
“What about women in stem?!”
“Why have you rewarded the trolls an sexists?!”
“Why would you give Trump the Ghostbusters film he wants?!”

Urgh, fun times ahead for the actors and director. Hope they just give them the middle finger an tell them to stick to Twitter.
 

GreyHorace

Member
I'll be entertained by the predictable media stances as per Alita and Joker in the meantime.
I'm still baffled as to why SJWs attacked Alita Battle Angel. I mean, it had:

- a badass female protagonist
- played by an actress of Peruvian descent
- living in a future city with a multicultural population
- based on a comic written and illustrated by a Japanese creator

It ticked all the boxes that these woke idiots look for in their media. Why did they decide to hate on it?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom