• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Giant Bomb @ E3 2016 | WEED3

border

Member
It would probably help if they inserted, like, any gameplay footage of their VR experiences. What they did was the absolute bare minimum effort.

Yeah it's hard to translate the appeal of VR into a video clip, but you have to try.

Farpoint has gameplay.....Final Fantasy XV has gameplay......Resident Evil 7 has gameplay.....Battlefront has gameplay.
 
Theres this indie game from a few years ago called Zenith where you could use the ingame fake cell phone to look at your twitter feed and tweet out random shit to friends. Before I knew how it worked, I hit the tweet button and it sent out a tweet at Swery about some bogus fake way last names worked "in my country". He replied with a totally earnest tweet about how names worked in Japan.

Anyways thats my Earnest Swery story, thanks for reading

SWERY is the best, unlike all the rest.

I hope he never stops doing what he does.
 
Comments like yours are really weird as well. Did I say that they should be jumping and yelling? No, I just said that they seemed kind of down on the conference, based on the tone they used during their post show coming off as them not really feeling it. Didn't claim it was a bad thing either, just that, from what I could tell, it seems like they didn't enjoy the show, and it's not helping anyone when that is just dismissed as "what, you want them to scream and shout the whole time?". It's a perfectly reasonable observation to make.

Dan specifically said it was Sony's worst presser in years.

But no, they weren't down on it. We're just PewDiePie fans who happened to stumble upon a Giant Bomb stream.
 
I'm literally watching it right now (at the Kojima game) and this seems in line with Giant Bomb since forever and pretty much every guy is reacting exactly how they have been to certain things for years.
 

StoveOven

Banned
Bullshit. I can't remember how many times they called Horizon 'great', but it was a lot.

Yeah, for as down as they were on some aspects of the conference, they were interested in God of War, Horizon, Detroit, the Kojima thing, and Resident Evil. I'd hardly call that cynical.
 

Egg0

Banned
So E3 this year did seem to be a little bit of a step down in spectacle, but last year was SUCH a big year for everyone that this year just couldn't compete. I came away with every press conference excited about at least two things, so in my book that's a total win. I'm excited to see the floor tomorrow and try out some fun stuff, and there is always a handful of things behind closed doors that are always enjoyable too. So all in all, it was a great E3 so far. Not the best, but not the worst, not by a long shot.

Yea. If you come out of E3 with things you want to play, I'd call that a success.
 

Cromwell

Banned
Agreed with the GB consensus on pretty much every conference this year. Sony was disappointing aside from Horizon and God of War. They're doing absolutely nothing to create a convincing case for VR. The other thing is, like last year, everything is way off from release. GoW doesn't even have a release date, could easily be a 2018 game.
 
It would probably help if they inserted, like, any gameplay footage of their VR experiences. What they did was the absolute bare minimum effort.

Yeah it's hard to translate the appeal of VR into a video clip, but you have to try.
I'd take what they did over the absolute momentum stoppers at every other press conference today.
 
Yea. If you come out of E3 with things you want to play, I'd call that a success.

Exactly, it's pointless to be nitpicky about the majority of stuff, because most of it is quite far away, but man September and October are going to be chock full of stuff this year... and those aren't even that far away. "It's never been a better time to be a gamer"
 

Tagyhag

Member
Comments like yours are really weird as well. Did I say that they should be jumping and yelling? No, I just said that they seemed kind of down on the conference, based on the tone they used during their post show coming off as them not really feeling it. Didn't claim it was a bad thing either, just that, from what I could tell, it seems like they didn't enjoy the show, and it's not helping anyone when that is just dismissed as "what, you want them to scream and shout the whole time?". It's a perfectly reasonable observation to make.

That observation is fine. The problem is that hardcore Sony fans think that Giant Bomb not thanking Sony for the best E3 conference of all time means that they're all cynical, jaded, MS fanboys, shouldn't be in this industry, etc.
 

megalowho

Member
So I watched the Giant Bomb stream of the Sony conference after seeing the conference separately, and man am I glad that I skipped watching their stuff the first time. The cynicism in that room seemed contagious. Dan was the only one that seemed like he was down for any of that stuff.
You're actually missing out on a lot of the initial excitement and seeing them in a more contemplative mood afterwards by skipping the live commentary. The reaction to the best stuff shown was pretty positive.
 

Joeku

Member
Farpoint has gameplay.....Final Fantasy XV has gameplay......Resident Evil 7 has gameplay.....Battlefront has gameplay.

Homieeeeeee.

Tell me what Farpoint actually is and/or how it plays. Like at all.

And tell me FFXV and BF aren't Batman-like brief "experiences".

Resident Evil I'll kinda (read: VR OPTIONAL) give you, cuz that has a demo out now since people loved P.T., but the rest? Come on.
 
Homieeeeeee.

Tell me what Farpoint actually is and/or how it plays. Like at all.

And tell me FFXV and BF aren't Batman-like brief "experiences".

Resident Evil I'll kinda (read: VR OPTIONAL) give you, cuz that has a demo out now since people loved P.T., but the rest? Come on.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say Farpoint plays like a FPS. Which they showed.
 

Tagyhag

Member
For good reason too, there was so little coverage on their VR system; a major (and for consoles, expensive) product launching fairly soon.

Not only that, but they spent days covering the Oculus and Vive. They know what disappointing VR software is like.

More than likely, if someone is getting a PSVR, they don't have an Oculus or Vive, so they don't understand why people are overly cautious about 1 hour VR experiences that are only fun to do once.
 

Siege.exe

Member
That observation is fine. The problem is that hardcore Sony fans think that Giant Bomb not thanking Sony for the best E3 conference of all time means that they're all cynical, jaded, MS fanboys, shouldn't be in this industry, etc.

I guess I'm just not seeing where any of that is coming from. I've seen the "huh, it's weird that you didn't really like it", but I've seen far more defense of their response than I have of people actually attacking it.
 
Agreed with the GB consensus on pretty much every conference this year. Sony was disappointing aside from Horizon and God of War. They're doing absolutely nothing to create a convincing case for VR. The other thing is, like last year, everything is way off from release. GoW doesn't even have a release date, could easily be a 2018 game.

Agreed. GB was on point at all times.
 

border

Member
At this point, what is "create a convincing case for VR" going to look like at this point? Sony's platform has small, experiemental indie experiences. It has full $60 retail titles that can be played completely in VR. It has mid-tier experiences using popular IPs like Star Wars and Batman. It has notable competitive and cooperative multiplayer titles. I'm not sure what else there is you could want, or how some more significant stage time would have convinced you that you did want more.
 

Tagyhag

Member
I guess I'm just not seeing where any of that is coming from. I've seen the "huh, it's weird that you didn't really like it", but I've seen far more defense of their response than I have of people actually attacking it.

Go look up their GAF or Youtube comments for Sony 2015.
 

TraBuch

Banned
I blame people hyping up VR for years for all the disappointment. If you couldn't see that there was gonna be an extremely rough start, I don't know what to tell ya.

Ignore it and check again in five years.
 

Plesiades

Member
Best coverage of the WEED3. Hands down.

weedsrov5.gif
 

Ploid 3.0

Member
Loved EZA coverage this year, so much better than the jaded GB crew..

It was to be expected. GB seem to be the type to expect the worst to hopefully be surprised when they finally play it, but they are stuck in the "This can't be right" mode and continue to look for the worst in things. I will check their commentary out soon, but I'm going in expecting the worst (hah, well expecting them to expect the worst). I'll check out Easy Allies tonight.
 

nomis

Member
GB haters seem like they don't wanna admit that Horizon was the only thing in the conference coming out remotely soon that looked legitimately sick as fuck. Which is why every man on the GB panel called it "great" more than once. For the right reasons, every time a mechanic or moment showed the depth and involvement of the encounters, some truly great looking game design from Guerilla.

Bombers were on point. They can get hyped, they're just sick of all the same old shit and don't wear tear drenched nostalgia goggles.
 

Joeku

Member
I blame people hyping up VR for years for all the disappointment. If you couldn't see that there was gonna be an extremely rough start, I don't know what to tell ya.

Ignore it and check again in five years.

It's not like people didn't expect this. It's early days for "proper" VR. There'll be a few years of growing pains while devs learn how games in that space should work. I'm totally okay with not buying a VR set for a few years until it evens out.

...But I can't help but feel that Sony should have made a better case for it than that.
 

Manbig

Member
You're actually missing out on a lot of the initial excitement and seeing them in a more contemplative mood afterwards by skipping the live commentary. The reaction to the best stuff shown was pretty positive.

No, I watched the whole thing after the fact. I just watched the press conference on my own the first time. So yeah, they were pretty positive on God of War and Horizon (my bad for failing to mention that one earlier), and they were kinda split on RE7. They seemed more keen to criticize the lack of what they felt like was good VR stuff and the lack of mentioning any PS Neo stuff, and that just kinda painted their whole opinion of it. Just found it to be a bit weird, because these conferences usually get criticized for not focusing on games, but this one was all just one game after another without any bullshit in the middle.
 

Mutagenic

Permanent Junior Member
At this point, what is "create a convincing case for VR" going to look like at this point? Sony's platform has small, experiemental indie experiences. It has full $60 retail titles that can be played completely in VR. It has mid-tier experiences using popular IPs like Star Wars and Batman. It has notable competitive and cooperative multiplayer titles. I'm not sure what else there is you could want, or how some more significant stage time would have convinced you that you did want more.
Sorry, but what I've seen out of it doesn't justify $400 in the slightest. Im not looking for what you consider mid-tier or 'experiences'. Maybe some people are, but I feel a vast majority are not. I'm not sure which $60 VR games make you excited. Examples?
 

border

Member
Tell me what Farpoint actually is and/or how it plays. Like at all.

And tell me FFXV and BF aren't Batman-like brief "experiences".

Resident Evil I'll kinda (read: VR OPTIONAL) give you, cuz that has a demo out now since people loved P.T., but the rest? Come on.

Farpoint is a game where you go to a planet and find out that there are monsters there and you have to shoot them with your gun which is in the middle of the frame throughout the entire video, so I think we can assume it's an action/shooter title.

Are FFXV and Battlefield brief? Probably, but gameplay is featured in their trailers.

Would a sizzle reel of all the already showcaseed titles (Rez, Gran Turismo, RIGs, Robot Golf, etc) have made VR look that much better?
 
It was to be expected. GB seem to be the type to expect the worst to hopefully be surprised when they finally play it, but they are stuck in the "This can't be right" mode and continue to look for the worst in things. I will check their commentary out soon, but I'm going in expecting the worst (hah, well expecting them to expect the worst). I'll check out Easy Allies tonight.
Sweet preemptive analysis of their coverage without having even watched it.

Giant Bomb does this weeeeeeeeird thing of being skeptical of a corporation's advertisements in an industry where outright lying and deceit is pretty common. They're one of the few big sites that's personality driven where everyone (sans Vinny) has a background in old school video game journalism and criticism. There's a very real and (IMO) good reason they are the way they are when they give their initial reaction in real time.
 

TraBuch

Banned
It's not like people didn't expect this. It's early days for "proper" VR. There'll be a few years of growing pains while devs learn how games in that space should work. I'm totally okay with not buying a VR set for a few years until it evens out.

...But I can't help but feel that Sony should have made a better case for it than that.
Obviously people didn't expect this judging by the complaints. Maybe there just is no better case for it right now.
 

nomis

Member
Just found it to be a bit weird, because these conferences usually get criticized for not focusing on games, but this one was all just one game after another without any bullshit in the middle.

Except all the bullshit VR "games". Stuff at the beginning like Farpoint I could leave or take but at least it looked substantive. When they have to ask themselves "Is this a free pack in? Is it $5? $20?" I think the commentators are rightly cynical.
 

border

Member
Sorry, but what I've seen out of it doesn't justify $400 in the slightest. Im not looking for what you consider mid-tier or 'experiences'. Maybe some people are, but I feel a vast majority are not. I'm not sure which $60 VR games make you excited. Examples?

Resident Evil and Gran Turismo would be my main areas of interest. I hope REZ isn't going to be $60, but it's a full-on game that should be an incredible experience.
 

BearPawB

Banned
Not sure why people feel a need to do thread drive-bys as if there is some sort of competition. Like there are a million places to watch the conferences that will suit your specific interests.

Farpoint looked boring as shit, and everything else was barely a game.
And i have a PSVR preordered. I really wanted that stuff to look cool
 
Farpoint has gameplay.....Final Fantasy XV has gameplay......Resident Evil 7 has gameplay.....Battlefront has gameplay.

Fair point. I was being hyperbolic, there was some footage. Resident Evil 7 was basically a CG trailer with an extra-wavy camera and FFXV had like 20 seconds of actual footage, but there was some. Farpoint and Battlefront... well I forgot those clips even aired. Then there was the Arkham VR thing which was literally nothing.

All I'm saying is the VR marketing they did was like an afterthought, which is insane for something they are charging the price of a console for. If they're going to treat VR like a novelty item then why even bother? Use one of your first party studios to make a full length, well made VR game and push it like it's something worth getting. Otherwise, don't even try because no one is dropping 400 bucks for some VR experiences.
 
Top Bottom