VAL0R
Banned
Because it was in response to this:
The city's mayor wrote the following in a blog post:
The City of Corsicana has recently made the decision to remove a display in Community Park. It was determined to be potentially racially insensitive. This was brought to our attention by a few citizens. The circumstances were evaluated and determined to be valid. It was not possible to leave the gorilla without the cage due to safety reasons. The statue was top heavy and was caged initially to protect the children. The cage will be left and turned into a climbing feature. The City will look at replacing the display in the future.
The Mayor of the city says he investigated it as being potentially racially insensitive and The circumstances were evaluated and determined to be valid. I didn't assume anything beyond the Mayor who would have more information in the matter determining that the concerns were valid for some reason. I do not know what they are, but the Mayor does and determined the concerns of racial insensitivity to be valid for some reason. It's right there in black and white and not something I invented. The mayor of the city is the one saying the claims were valid.
Right, well he may be determining the "validity" of "racial insensitivity" based on the appearance of the statue alone with no reference to the artist at all. You said, "the painted aspect[...] was possibly racially motivated," which goes beyond that, implying intention of the artist. Some object can be racially insensitive in appearance but only persons can be motivated.
But anyway, I get your point and don't really want to belabor the argument.