Wax Free Vanilla
Member
A license test / online play focused GT game with minimal content costing £75 doesn't float my boat.
Sport will be the first GT game I don't buy if bikes / IoM are missing. I've finally had enough of their shit.
GT Sport E3 2016 Trailer
- Thread starter piccio_ssl
- Start date
A license test / online play focused GT game with minimal content costing £75 doesn't float my boat.
Sport will be the first GT game I don't buy if bikes / IoM are missing. I've finally had enough of their shit.
Jack The Nipper
Banned
Agreed and blurry even compared to things like batman race tracks
MegaSackman
Member
The music in the first minute... was it used in every GT or I'm allowed to feel nostalgic?
SolidSnakex
Member
The beginning is GT4's intro to Moon Over the Castle, which is GT's theme song.
Talkin about hyperboles
thelastword
Banned
Amazing visuals, Now I know Japan was not on the same wavelength with Naughty Dog/Ice team for tech on the PS3, but currently Sony first parties have several great solutions for AA in their games. It started with Infamous, then we saw what was done with Tearaway, then we had the best solution I've seen to date (UC4) and recently Horizon Zero Dawn which seems to be using a similar solution to UC4. Please for the love of god Poliphony, use that AA solution that these guys have showcased. I know polish is the last thing that comes through, but I really want a GT with great IQ again like GT3 on the PS2. Horizon had lots of shimmer, but boy does it look good now.
tiebreaker
Member
A little bit put off by emphasis on competitive multiplayer. Might get the game later just like Driveclub.
The music though...
The music though...
MegaSackman
Member
The lighting engine is very very good.
But this looks horrible for a simulator.
Is this still marketed as simulator?
Because if you look how the car behaves in this trailer it is very weird.
The car driving looks arcade and if you look if the cars go off the road they seem to spin like in Outrun (exaggerating a little).
I get the feeling they are spending the money more on replays and photo creation then on creating better gameplay and more features that matter for racing (like weather, physics,etc...)
Very sad because Gran Turismo (1 and 2) were groundbreaking.
If you look at Project Cars then you can see they have put the bar higher.
But this looks horrible for a simulator.
Is this still marketed as simulator?
Because if you look how the car behaves in this trailer it is very weird.
The car driving looks arcade and if you look if the cars go off the road they seem to spin like in Outrun (exaggerating a little).
I get the feeling they are spending the money more on replays and photo creation then on creating better gameplay and more features that matter for racing (like weather, physics,etc...)
Very sad because Gran Turismo (1 and 2) were groundbreaking.
If you look at Project Cars then you can see they have put the bar higher.
Wax Free Vanilla
Member
75 GBP? Come on.
Lion Heart
Banned
Damn, hyped after that trailer. Graphics look great, although I haven't seen Tokyo yet, I was super unimpressed with that track based on the footage released so far.
I still think GT7 will be the legit sequel but an E-sports game in between makes sense, to try and capture that market that hasn't really been tapped yet.
I still think GT7 will be the legit sequel but an E-sports game in between makes sense, to try and capture that market that hasn't really been tapped yet.
Wax Free Vanilla
Member
GT Sport will not require PS plus?
FootballFan
Member
Looks excellent
GT is godtier driving bliss, always has been
GT is godtier driving bliss, always has been
dr.rocktopus
Banned
I really wanted Panama to follow the opening :'(
TheMissingLink
Member
I don't like racing games...
But this trailer got me a little excited, not gonna lie.
But this trailer got me a little excited, not gonna lie.
J_ToSaveTheDay
Member
Definitely loving the graphical presentation. Would love if they could release a demo of this so I can get a sense of the new physics engine. I'm definitely more of a casual player when it comes to these sims, but I do really appreciate the elevated level of technicality over an arcade racer, and while I might not be able to discern how real-world-accurate the physics are, I've found that I actually do enjoy when things get a little more complex in terms of physics simulation, and several other games have done a pretty good job of layering physics complexity in that elevates the overall feel of the game in the last few years -- Project Cars and Forza 6 in my case. GT6 also felt like a good step up from GT5 for me, so hoping this game is pushing it even further, especially since this appears to be sort of a stop-gap release until GT7 comes out later down the road.
Louis Cyphre
Banned
There are discrepancies though. Plus I'm still generally disappointed with the graphics/dithering/shimering?/poor shadows etc. And no beta....
This is what I don't like: GT Sport website image under graphics versus replay in new trailer. Leaving IQ out it, the tree trunk and general detail are worlds apart. In the description they are clearly muddying the water between what is gameplay and photo-mode graphics, too...
I look at the gameplay, the photo mode and replays and they all look different. Polyphony is definitely guilty of touching things up here and there. The game looks good, just not that wow factor I was expecting. GT7 will no doubt be the game many of us are waiting for. Still this trailer is better than the last one.
sems4arsenal
Member
Lighting is fantastic, visually it's improving bit by bit.
Hopefully they show us another trailer at the conference.
Hopefully they show us another trailer at the conference.
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
Looks far from mediocre as well
Long Division
Banned
Is that Cleopatra?
Agree, rather mediocre. The leaves and branches in the trees repeat frequently.
Wax Free Vanilla
Member
Ok, waxever
Any juicy offline stuff in the pipeline for GT Sport?
The gutted GT mode should have been replaced by an in depth race creator, polyphony just leaving the game with that disgusting arcade mode and a bunch of license tests is just wrong.
djplaeskool
Member
For some reason, the idea of a high focus on online and sanctioned competition for this is really enticing. I'm in.
Louis Cyphre
Banned
Yeah, if they can nail the social and online play this will be awesome.
Weapon of War
Member
Haha... that poor guy being denied a hand shake at 3:55. This trailer sure looked better than the last, though.
Looks a bit rough, at least compared to DriveClub (visually). However, I'm sure it will be tweaked more and more. I mean, they were tweaking DriveClub even after release.
However, if there is 60 fps, it might be worth slightly worse graphics (not sure what this game is supposed to be).
However, if there is 60 fps, it might be worth slightly worse graphics (not sure what this game is supposed to be).
Honey Bunny
Member
Fucking hell it's a real trailer
All it's missing is some Daiki Kasho
All it's missing is some Daiki Kasho
AstroNut325
Member
Can you point me to a racing game that has every tree branch and leaf being unique?
blastprocessor
The Amiga Brotherhood
KinofChaos
Banned
LOL, the definition of nitpicking and looking for something to complain about
MRrogermoore
Member
Since when are Polyphony Digital known to push a system close to limits? stop complaining about graphics and shit, sigh. they will do their best to present a visually good game.
Woodchipper
Member
Why all this early E3 stuff? I want it at E3 ffs!
Apex
Member
If you pick a similar angle and match resolutions it looks almost the same as the photomode pic.
Replay
Photomode
I kinda like the whole "Driving Is For Everyone" message.
I don't know if anybody else does this or if I'm crazy for doing so, but I'm one of those people who'll buy really deep and expansive hardcore simulator games but only enjoy them in a casual way.
I like messing around with simulators as toy chests because of how feature-rich they tend to be, and because they put a lot of pretty graphics and deep gameplay into something that isn't a shooter. I just don't get super deep into all the expert driving or flying or tuning stuff. One of my favorite games right now is ArmA 3 even though I'm not ultra deep into hardcore combat simulators. I just like playing around with all the different weapons, vehicles, and maps, which ends up being hours of fun anyway. I did the same thing with the last couple Top Spin games. I've played like 70 hours of Elite: Dangerous but always play with the flight assist and only go the explorer route. What I'm saying is, if this means Polyphony is trying to make a more accessible driving simulator, or one for people who might casually flirt with driving as well as hardcore driving enthusiasts, I might be all for it.
I've always kind of wanted people to try to make "intermediate hardcore simulators."
I don't know if anybody else does this or if I'm crazy for doing so, but I'm one of those people who'll buy really deep and expansive hardcore simulator games but only enjoy them in a casual way.
I like messing around with simulators as toy chests because of how feature-rich they tend to be, and because they put a lot of pretty graphics and deep gameplay into something that isn't a shooter. I just don't get super deep into all the expert driving or flying or tuning stuff. One of my favorite games right now is ArmA 3 even though I'm not ultra deep into hardcore combat simulators. I just like playing around with all the different weapons, vehicles, and maps, which ends up being hours of fun anyway. I did the same thing with the last couple Top Spin games. I've played like 70 hours of Elite: Dangerous but always play with the flight assist and only go the explorer route. What I'm saying is, if this means Polyphony is trying to make a more accessible driving simulator, or one for people who might casually flirt with driving as well as hardcore driving enthusiasts, I might be all for it.
I've always kind of wanted people to try to make "intermediate hardcore simulators."