Halo 4: Review Thread

I just thought I would chime in and tell everyone to shut the hell up already.

This discussion is pointless. Halo 4 is the videogame industry's equivalent to a hollywood blockbuster. Discussing reviews of this game is pointless and idiotic. We're talking about a flashy, obnoxious, and expensive game. This game is pure spectacle (like a hollywood blockbuster) and that is completely fine. In fact, I'll be one of the morons waiting in line at midnight tomorrow to get a copy.

Reviews are not objective. Reviews are not scripture. Its frightening how much some of you people are indoctrinated into the... I don't know "ideology" of this product. Gaming commodity fetishism? This is not the videogame equivalent of Citizen Kane people. This is just a dumb game where you run forward and shoot aliens.

Also, everyone having this objective vs. subjective debate needs to grow some god damn brains. It shows that you know nothing about journalism, literature, or writing in general.

I also realize I am mostly talking to 15 year old boys right now. At least I hope you guys are 15. You are 15, right?


You seem angry.
 
99% of the people killing the guy from EGM have not played the game. How can they have any opinion. EGM > the 99%.

Because they have played Halo and he was comparing it to Call of Duty rather than rating it based on its own merits.

Also I have played it and it doesn't mean I am any more right than the other people complaining about the review.
 
16 year old complains about 15 year olds. Complains about complaining. Responds to thread without reading thread. Makes fool of self.

Name becomes self fulfilling prophecy.
 
What;s the point of a review thread if it omits negative reviews?

Tom Chick has a long career and has freelanced for a ton of websites.

He clearly can't review for shit, another case of a reviewer putting their personal likes before actually rating the game on its worth.

And I don't care what anyone says, the game clearly isn't a 2/10 game.
 
99% of the people killing the guy from EGM have not played the game. How can they have any opinion. EGM > the 99%.

Actually, many have played the game or already have it and are doing so. Even that doesn't change the fact the main issues people have with the review is how he wants to completely change the Halo formula to make it more inline with Call of Duty if for no other reason than CoD iis the popular FPS right now.
 
What;s the point of a review thread if it omits negative reviews?

Tom Chick has a long career and has freelanced for a ton of websites.

He's got a long history of being a dipshit. Giving a dipshit attention isn't required. Especially when said dipshit writes a "review'" full of spoilers. Metacritic includes him, Vire doesnt have to if he doesnt want to. If he wants to sure, if he doesnt, don't pressure him to do so. His thread.

Fistfuls of stupid

You were saying something about 15 year olds?
 
It is true that a nice amount of people havn't played the game (which is why I havn't really judged these reviews yet) but the mentality of thinking every shooter needs to be identical to cod's setup is a little insane.
 
Actually, many have played the game or already have it and are doing so. Even that doesn't change the fact the main issues people have with the review is how he wants to completely change the Halo formula to make it more inline with Call of Duty if for no other reason than CoD iis the popular FPS right now.

Or maybe he is pointing out how outdated he feels HALO 4 is. Lets face it, COD mops the floor with HALO in sales and XBox live/PSN playtime. There's a reason for that.
 
He clearly can't review for shit, another case of a reviewer putting their personal likes before actually rating the game on its worth.

And I don't care what anyone says, the game clearly isn't a 2/10 game.

For him it's a 1/5 game -- and, yes, there is a difference. His scale is his own.
 
Or maybe he is pointing out how outdated he feels HALO 4 is. Lets face it, COD mops the floor with HALO in sales and XBox live/PSN playtime. There's a reason for that.

It's multiplatform therefore has more buyers? lol otherwise Halo competes very well against COD.
 
Or maybe he is pointing out how outdated he feels HALO 4 is. Lets face it, COD mops the floor with HALO in sales and XBox live/PSN playtime. There's a reason for that.

He was still making direct comparisons to CoD which is awful for a review, when you review a game you review it on its own merits and NEVER compare it to another game.

It's multiplatform there has more buyers? lol otherwise Halo competes very well against COD.

Also this.
 
Or maybe he is pointing out how outdated he feels HALO 4 is. Lets face it, COD mops the floor with HALO in sales and XBox live/PSN playtime. There's a reason for that.

So if something sells more, everything should become more like it? Madden sells more than NHL. They should put more football in the NHL games.
 
Shame that these piss-poor reviews drag down the meta-critic.. Im not talking about bad scores, Im talking about shitty reviews. Its now at an 88.. Really hope 343's bonuses weren't tied to Metacritic.

88?!?! Lots of Razzies incoming. The shitty reviews can also be high scoring too...
 
Or maybe he is pointing out how outdated he feels HALO 4 is. Lets face it, COD mops the floor with HALO in sales and XBox live/PSN playtime. There's a reason for that.

iVo4Uo7wkcZhg.gif
 
This thread has been super entertaining, I'd just would like to thank everyone for being apart of this magical journey.
 
On Xbox only, Halo 4 will be the most played on live for 1 week. When COD comes out the next week it will take over on XBOX sales and LIVE play.

So? COD is more popular, I didn't dispute that, I said Halo competes well against COD. It's the highest selling exclusive franchise on 360 and doesn't have half the casual appeal COD does.

But like others have said, COD does not sell well because it's progressive and Halo isn't, lord ...
 
The same reason the Transformers movies are some of the highest grossing films of all time?

LOL so now HALO is Shakespeare. It takes a refine individual to like HALO more than COD. Its entertainment, more people are entertained by COD than Halo. That is a fact. COD(Transformers) is not fart jokes in comparison to Halo(Citizen Kane).
 
This thread has been super entertaining, I'd just would like to thank everyone for being apart of this magical journey.

I can't wait to see what's going to happen with the inevitable CoD reviews thread after all of the hilarity in this thread.

LOL so now HALO is Shakespeare. It take a refine individual to like HALO more than COD. Its entertainment more people are entertained by COD than Halo. That is a fact. COD(Transformers) is not fart jokes in comparison to Halo(Citizen Kane).
Not saying that Halo is the best game of our time, just saying that the quality, themes, and target audience of Transformers and Call of Duty are practically identical.
 
In the review he mentioned things he liked about Reach, ODST and Combat Evolved.
That may well be, but he also gave Reach a 6.5 in his review for Gameshark, and listed it as one of the most overrated games of 2010. So that's something to keep in mind. (I'm not going to read his review because I don't want spoilers, maybe I will after play the game.)
 
I can't wait to see what's going to happen with the inevitable CoD reviews thread after all of the hilarity in this thread.

"Despite being a very similar formula to previous entires in the series and having a Michael Bay style single player campaign Black Ops 2 brings back the excellent gameplay and competitive arena we've loved for 10+ years - 9.5/10"

:(

I'm buying both
 
Something of note from that link: Spartan Ops missions are most definitely not all reused. Two of the five reuse level geometry, one reuses a group of buildings in a totally different environmental context, and the other two missions are completely unique.

Apart from the whole spoilers thing, there are a few factual errors in Chick's review, but other than that? Nothing wrong with the guy not liking the game or the series as a whole, even if his knowledge of the series isn't really up to par.
 
"Despite being a very similar formula to previous entires in the series and having a Michael Bay style single player campaign Black Ops 2 brings back the excellent gameplay and competitive arena we've loved for 10+ years - 9.5/10"

:(

I'm buying both

Fortunately Redbox carries BLOPS2. No need to buy it. I'll just use one of Wario's numerous free game rental codes and burn through the single player campaign in a night. They're fun in a cheesy way.
 
I just thought I would chime in and tell everyone to shut the hell up already.

This discussion is pointless. Halo 4 is the videogame industry's equivalent to a hollywood blockbuster. Discussing reviews of this game is pointless and idiotic. We're talking about a flashy, obnoxious, and expensive game. This game is pure spectacle (like a hollywood blockbuster) and that is completely fine. In fact, I'll be one of the morons waiting in line at midnight tomorrow to get a copy.

Reviews are not objective. Reviews are not scripture. Its frightening how much some of you people are indoctrinated into the... I don't know "ideology" of this product. Gaming commodity fetishism? This is not the videogame equivalent of Citizen Kane people. This is just a dumb game where you run forward and shoot aliens.

Also, everyone having this objective vs. subjective debate needs to grow some god damn brains. It shows that you know nothing about journalism, literature, or writing in general.

I also realize I am mostly talking to 15 year old boys right now. At least I hope you guys are 15. You are 15, right?

Posts like these are annoying as hell. You just typed a few paragraphs telling everyone to shut the hell up about Halo 4 reviews in the Halo 4 review discussion thread. Thanks for the meaningful and well thought out contribution.

As for the Tom Chick review - the spoilers in it are inexcusable. Totally a dick move.
 
Personally I am just glad we stopped talking about that review and moved on to a different one.

There isn't much to talk about in this one though. It's just so bat shit off the wall that it's hard to make sense of anything.

Does it bother you guys at 343 after working 3 years on something and then a guy gives you a 2?
 
Top Bottom