For sure, it's more a combination of everything over any individual part.
But what competent defender is going to get baited by an attacker in a less-than-optimal position for their one job of preventing the flag from leaving the base?
Objectively better for competitive play, like tournaments where money is on the line. Sound-based radar may be best for some Matchmaking playlists over motion tracker.
So is human intuition.
Well, yeah? Improving your ability to successful predict player movements is a skill that is gimped by players relying on motion tracker for too much info.
Difference between me and you and is that although I'm an advocate for no motion tracker, I would never say something like "the reason 'scrubs' don't want it is because they get donged on by better players without it.. but funny thing is, they get bodied by those same competitive players regardless, except one way they're gimping their progression as a player (if that's what they're interested in, improving at the game)."
Sure it may feel good to say it, and to some extent may be true, but it just makes your argument seem less credible IMO. Not saying I'm the best "debater" around, but I'm only disappointed because players like you exist where they probably haven't played too much Halo without motion tracker, yet they critique the other side as if those who oppose don't have experience with motion tracker on, just suck with it, or whatever other reason you come up with that involves emotions and blind rage speaking for them lol.