RE: the university question: that’s a masterpiece of a gotcha question because the most correct answer is “it depends.” And I think that’s where their minds melted down, because they’re thinking of the…I dunno, one time out of a thousand where it’s not? So they don’t want to say yes because they’re thinking of the exception to the rule, where that hate speech might not be considered bullying or harassment (e.g. said in private to a non-Jew; no one is bullied or harassed in this scenario). Then they get called out for that one exception and can’t have that!
But the way it’s worded using “calling for” …you don’t really call for things to a single person in private, it’s done from a pulpit or during marches or put on signs. That’s obviously harassment and bullying Jewish students who definitely will hear and see it. So the likelihood of there being any real exception to the rule is basically nil. You could confidently answer yes and use that above explanation to someone piping up and saying “well what about this (extremely unlikely thing)?”
Well, how many times do you “call for” genocide in private because you don’t want the people you hate to know about it, moron?
Anyway, that’s my viral video meltdown analysis.