Represent.
Banned
Ill agree with the Kathleen actor, seemed very Walking Dead-y. That show has some shit actors minus the OG Season 1 crew
Felt kinda awkward listening to OG Tommy doing a new character lol.
So are you talking about just acting here? Because I had to google who Chandler Riggs was but he certainly wasn’t a main character during the peak years.I think you have some sort of reverse recency bias, because the acting here is far and away better than the walking dead and so is pretty much every element of the show.
Compare Bella Ramsey to Chandler Riggs.... lol
Seriously? Rose?I understand. I have a feeling more people will agree with me on the casting of Rose from Two and a Half Men.
Which is exactly what most people were arguing about but instead got flamed for being homophobic... I want more of Joel and Ellie and Im sure most do too.Welp, loved episode 3 last week but after this one, kind of pissed episode 3 was more than an hour and this was 4x minutes...
Good episode but casting that chick from Two and a Half Men for this dramatic role is a mistake. This is the second time they've done this. First with Nick Offerman who I personally felt out of place in a serious role, and now this chick. Way too many miscasts in one show. Bella was decent at making jokes but im still not seeing Ellie in her. Pedro is alright but way too 'Dad of War' so far.
Sets look fantastic, but man one small fight scene with like 3 dudes, two of whom get shot off screen is a bizarre choice. This was supposed to be the episode with the SECOND bloater and the tank chase sequence. So they meet up with Sam and Henry BEFORE they even get chased through the city? I feel like they skipped like 2 hours of ingame content.
Most people were just bitching about the whole episode, but yeah I get your point.Which is exactly what most people were arguing about but instead got flamed for being homophobic...
I agree with you about the woman, her acting was very stale and left much to be desired. But you missed the mark with the Nick Offerman/serious role bit. Go watch Devs, he's excellent in serious roles.
I always thought it was insinuated that Ellie had to have killed Riley once she turned "before her" for obvious reasons. How else would she have escaped?
Ill agree with the Kathleen actor, seemed very Walking Dead-y.
Do you mean Melanie Lynskey playing Kathleen? She's a new character, just like Perry is. Unless you're referring to someone else.
But still, there are some character traits that just looks off. Her being all giggity with her new weapon when Joel was giving it to her, after almost killing a man with it ...
Are they trying to show her as kind of a psychopath? Her acting is deviating too much from the source material in places. Weird.
Ellie should be shocked and etc. after almost killing a man. She was crying right after that encounter. And then she gets all happy by being given a gun? Doesnt make sense
She wants his approval, yes. But smiling in a situation like this isnt realistic for a girl who cried from shooting a guy 5 minutes prior.I think her happiness was more so from winning Joel's approval, which she openly seeks many times in Part 1. I could be wrong though, just how I interpreted it.
Probably not without having a say so, which is why the ending of the first game works for the player, advancing through Joel's perspective. As for their interactions before the actual hospital, she can dream and hope. But I find it unlikely she would bring it up. Both because she's still a girl and children often think life will last forever and because that would be such a bummer at the time. Not to mention it wouldn't do any good: they can't know what really awaits them and the entire journey has been about surviving through sheer will. You can't be assuming you'll die at every corner while surviving, you gotta push that aside and take to the task at hand. Talking about a possible future gives them more energy to keep going, as opposed to taking away from that by considering she might not make it, however realistic that possibility seems...The fact they face so many dangers to get to the hospital lends credence that she might be willing to die for the vaccine, but would she be OK without ever getting a choice, without caring if she sees Joel one last time after their bonding? That's the part I'm having trouble buying with what I've seen of Ellie's character in TLOU1.
There's still the conversation Joel and Ellie have before the hospital talking about a future together and she agreeing with what Joel wants to do and Joel making it clear he's not leaving her side anymore. If the possibility of dying was on her mind you'd think she'd bring it up then but she never does. Would Ellie really lead Joel on like that if the possibility of dying was on her mind? Again, I doubt it.
I understand. I have a feeling more people will agree with me on the casting of Rose from Two and a Half Men.
Yea I knew it had something to do with her character more than the acting as soon as I saw her, hopefully goes somewhere if they’re gonna keep her for 2 episodes.For all the Kathleen complaints, listen to the podcast - Mazin said there is reasoning behind her acting, and they wanted the audience to be confused as to how someone like her could be a leader.
He said keeps watching.
Holding my judgement back.
Welp, loved episode 3 last week but after this one, kind of pissed episode 3 was more than an hour and this was 4x minutes...
Well, next episode is an hour long and there'll be very little need for setup, which took a big chunk of this week's episode. They'll reach the suburbs, which is the end of the city segment. So, should also be pretty action packed.Yea I knew it had something to do with her character more than the acting as soon as I saw her, hopefully goes somewhere if they’re gonna keep her for 2 episodes.
Ill agree with the Kathleen actor, seemed very Walking Dead-y. That show has some shit actors minus the OG Season 1 crew
He played Tommy in the games FYI.When i heard the bearded guy talk, I thought to myself, this guys sounds like he could've played Joel's brother Tommy.
For all the Kathleen complaints, listen to the podcast - Mazin said there is reasoning behind her acting, and they wanted the audience to be confused as to how someone like her could be a leader.
He said keeps watching.
Holding my judgement back.
So are you talking about just acting here? Because I had to google who Chandler Riggs was but he certainly wasn’t a main character during the peak years.
It doesn't work like that though, episode 3 being the length it was had nothing to do with how long episode 4 is.Most people were just bitching about the whole episode, but yeah I get your point.
I just dont get why they couldnt do an hour long episode for ep4 and cut 10-15 minutes from episode 3 or something. Do we have the running time for all episodes?
Come on, bro.This argument is flawed.
I can make plans with my family next year, but if I was told by the doctor that needs to have surgery to save my life next week and the chances of survival were 40%, then that doesn't mean I deceived my family by making plans for the future.
She didn't think the operation would kill her and that's why she made plans. It's that simple. Repeating this argument isn't going to work because it's flawed and illogical.
Yeah and I don't believe the part she'd be OK with dying without informed consent with a total disregard for Joel's feelings never seeing her alive again after being forcefully separated. I can believe she'd thought they'd do all kinds of tests and experimentations first, but resorting to killing her within hours of receiving her, nah.We're telling you Ellie's thought process in The Last of Us Part I and confirming it with Part II. What you're doing is trying to convince us that The Last of Us Part II is not cannon and it's not working. lol
Elie struck me as being hopeful and optimistic when they were near that hospital(after the giraffe scene) so if she thought of possibly dying, she's putting up a good act hiding it and that kind of deception doesn't strike me as something Ellie would do to Joel. The simplest explanation IMO is that it's simply not on her mind when approaching to the hospital. Not even Marlene and the researchers thought she'd ever need to die until after Ellie arrived at the hospital so why would Ellie ever get the impression she might have to die, let alone be prepared to?Probably not without having a say so, which is why the ending of the first game works for the player, advancing through Joel's perspective. As for their interactions before the actual hospital, she can dream and hope. But I find it unlikely she would bring it up. Both because she's still a girl and children often think life will last forever and because that would be such a bummer at the time. Not to mention it wouldn't do any good: they can't know what really awaits them and the entire journey has been about surviving through sheer will. You can't be assuming you'll die at every corner while surviving, you gotta push that aside and take to the task at hand. Talking about a possible future gives them more energy to keep going, as opposed to taking away from that by considering she might not make it, however realistic that possibility seems...
On Episode 4, I liked that it's more action packed, but I could've used a gun fight or two more. They sort of cram half of Pittsburgh into 20 minutes...
I'll watch it tonight but I remember local articles about them filming in KC.broo they nailed kansas city