I started rewatching GoT yesterday, havent watched the show entirely in 4 years.matt smith + olivia cooke. i'm in.
plus i must be one of the very few people who didn't hate GoT. it was a bit rushed towards the end and that Arya scene is nuts but otherwise i enjoyed it! going to rewatch it all again
The entire story this show is covering takes place in the first book. They will not have any guesswork on the ending. It's set in stone.Nobody_Important So educate us casuals dear book reader. Does this entail the full history this story is going to tell or does it simply stop as there's only one of two books out?
Judging by the trailer they are covering the lead up, the civil war, and possibly the aftermath.
Total speculation, but HBO hopefully learned their lesson from GOT. They wanted it to be longer, and so did GRRM. It was only D&D who wanted to wrap it up, so HBO trusted them and followed their lead.That’s a lot of stuff for only 10 episodes. That would mean the show would have to be incredibly fast-paced, which could be a good thing, but could also mean there‘s not a lot of time for politicking and character development, and more of a focus on action instead.
Even the first season of GoT, which covered by far the greatest timespan of all the seasons (just like the first book, which is the most fast-paced) ended only at the beginning of the war, with 9 out of 10 episodes dedicated to the build-up, politicking, and character development. The rest of the war needed two more seasons before it was concluded.
And unlike GoT, House of the Dragon covers multiple time periods, which means even more stuff that has to fit into 10 episodes. I find it hard to imagine they manage to do all this in a single season.
Where are you getting the idea that there will be only 10 episodes and a single season? HBO has already said there will be more than one season and that season 2 has already been reportedly greenlit.That’s a lot of stuff for only 10 episodes. That would mean the show would have to be incredibly fast-paced, which could be a good thing, but could also mean there‘s not a lot of time for politicking and character development, and more of a focus on action instead.
Even the first season of GoT, which covered by far the greatest timespan of all the seasons (just like the first book, which is the most fast-paced) ended only at the beginning of the war, with 9 out of 10 episodes dedicated to the build-up, politicking, and character development. The rest of the war needed two more seasons before it was concluded.
And unlike GoT, House of the Dragon covers multiple time periods, which means even more stuff that has to fit into 10 episodes. I find it hard to imagine they manage to do all this in a single season.
Where are you getting the idea that there will be only 10 episodes and a single season? HBO has already said there will be more than one season and that season 2 has already been reportedly greenlit.
Judging by the trailer they are covering the lead up, the civil war, and possibly the aftermath.
Oh sorry. I was just referring to the age jumps of the characters and how some of the scenes are taking place years apart.I was responding to this comment of yours:
I thought you meant that they would do all this in this upcoming season. So you expect them to spread the story out over several seasons?
Racism
'House of the Dragon' creator explains major change to House Velaryon
'House of the Dragon' co-showrunner Ryan Condal explains the major change to House Velaryon and not wanting "another bunch of white people on the screen."ew.com
Weird reasoning. I would accept a stupid reason such as one of the velaryon's ancestors mating with Summer Islander or the skin changed due to the long voyage to Essos or Sothoros.
Weird reasoning. I would accept a stupid reason such as one of the velaryon's ancestors mating with Summer Islander or the skin changed due to the long voyage to Essos or Sothoros.
Their kind is a weird bunch, with all the success Peter Jackson's LOTR trilogy had, they still talked about the making the next LOTR for a bigger audience..."The world is very different now than it was 10 years ago when [Game of Thrones] all started. It's different than 20 years ago when Peter Jackson made The Lord of the Rings. These types of stories need to be more inclusive than they traditionally have been,"
"It was very important for Miguel and I to create a show that was not another bunch of white people on the screen, just to put it very bluntly."
Well, at least they're honest about their racism.
Yeah. It's really not faithul to history! My history books tell me that when people were fighting dragons and stuff 1000 years ago, in Westeros, Europe, there were no women in power!Already going on a bit of bad foot in terms marketing. I don't think even in medieval times men were opposed to woman being leader due to some in built misogyny, but simply because they sensed weakness and incompetency.
Stop playing dumb. They've made it very clear why they've made these choices, and it's got nothing to do with telling a good story.Yeah. It's really not faithul to history! My history books tell me that when people were fighting dragons and stuff 1000 years ago, in Westeros, Europe, there were no women in power!
As far as I know this is based on the books.Stop playing dumb. They've made it very clear why they've made these choices, and it's got nothing to do with telling a good story.
Ah ok, I think I'm mixing things up with LOTR. Hard to keep up with all these virtue signaling showsAs far as I know this is based on the books.
"Princess Rhaenyra Targaryen, [...] was the first-born child of King Viserys I Targaryen. [...] At the age of eight, she was made her father's heir and grew up expecting to become the first ruling Queen of Westeros. Her claim to the Iron Throne was challenged by her younger half-brother, Aegon II Targaryen, sparking the civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons."
https://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Rhaenyra_Targaryen
As far as I know this is based on the books.
"Princess Rhaenyra Targaryen, [...] was the first-born child of King Viserys I Targaryen. [...] At the age of eight, she was made her father's heir and grew up expecting to become the first ruling Queen of Westeros. Her claim to the Iron Throne was challenged by her younger half-brother, Aegon II Targaryen, sparking the civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons."
https://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Rhaenyra_Targaryen
As far as I know this is based on the books.
"Princess Rhaenyra Targaryen, [...] was the first-born child of King Viserys I Targaryen. [...] At the age of eight, she was made her father's heir and grew up expecting to become the first ruling Queen of Westeros. Her claim to the Iron Throne was challenged by her younger half-brother, Aegon II Targaryen, sparking the civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons."
https://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Rhaenyra_Targaryen
Which is also based on a real historical event. A civil war in England known as The Anarchy.
'House of the Dragon' creator explains major change to House Velaryon
'House of the Dragon' co-showrunner Ryan Condal explains the major change to House Velaryon and not wanting "another bunch of white people on the screen."ew.com
Weird reasoning. I would accept a stupid reason such as one of the velaryon's ancestors mating with Summer Islander or the skin changed due to the long voyage to Essos or Sothoros.
'House of the Dragon' creator explains major change to House Velaryon
'House of the Dragon' co-showrunner Ryan Condal explains the major change to House Velaryon and not wanting "another bunch of white people on the screen."ew.com
Weird reasoning. I would accept a stupid reason such as one of the velaryon's ancestors mating with Summer Islander or the skin changed due to the long voyage to Essos or Sothoros.
It’s almost as if we never grew up with (well mainly reruns) The Jefferson’s, Good Times, Sanford & Sons, Fat Albert & The Cosby Kids, The Cosby Show, Fresh Prince, etc, that EVERYONE enjoyed.I'm black and have no problems with all white shows or movies. Guess what? It mimics real life! I don't need a white person any predominantly black media either. It's pandering.
You guys were way too pessimistic. I'm not expecting it to be a complete masterpiece, but GoT was flooded with a dozen highly skilled directors, casting directors, special effects teams, and more. Even the final season basically just suffered from the poor writing / plot. Every other element of it was among the best TV production capability out there. So that's going to be a constant.Way better than what i was expecting.
She was a pretty hot sister, NGL.Season 1 of GoT: "Ewww incest."
Season 8 of GoT: "Yay incest!"
Wonder what the incest discourse will be for this series.
You guys were way too pessimistic. I'm not expecting it to be a complete masterpiece, but GoT was flooded with a dozen highly skilled directors, casting directors, special effects teams, and more. Even the final season basically just suffered from the poor writing / plot. Every other element of it was among the best TV production capability out there. So that's going to be a constant.
Now we just wait on the plot and writing and see how it goes.