3 sentences? More like 2 words.The secret for why there's way more complaining about Face Hunter than there is "discussion" about it is that you can summarise everything constructive there is to know about the deck in a three-sentence post.
3 sentences? More like 2 words.
Hit face.
You can check the deck I posted in the 2nd link... it has a list with double Quick Shot in it for Face Hunter. I personally think it's the best one and I am using it as well (not as a main deck... just for testing purposes. I use Midrange Hunter with double Quick Shot for real games).ok kool thx Dah
The funny thing is I have not even put Quick Shot in my Face Hunter yet. I can't decide what to replace, it's not just an automatic easy decision. I was thinking one Arcane Golem and one Mad Scientist
btw even though I know you personally do not like agro decks, you are always cordial & informative when discussing them here. I respect that
all the other posters in here just rant about agro decks instead
Don't cut mad scientist. Card is way too good.
Mad scientist seems better suited for more midrange decks imo. I wouldn't be surprised if people cut down to 1 scientist or cut him out of the deck altogether. He is a pretty bad top deck in a deck that has very very few bad top decks, and if you topdeck him mid-late game, you probably wanted the explosive trap immediately instead of later.
Cut out one Abusive Sergeant then. I think having two Abusive Sergeant is a bit much in the deck.Yeah this was what I was thinking. one Mad Scientist for Face Hunter might be enough
Like you said Mobius, later on in the game I'd rather just play Explosive immediately
I'll also try Dahbomb/Trump's deck, but I'm not sure about cutting one Owl... I always seem to need those
Tirion dropping from Sneed's. Doesn't even feel fair.
ME NO STOOPID
ME GO FACE
ME NO TRADE
ME ONLY CHARGE
SCIENTIST NO CHARGE
I love the elitism of those that don't play facehunter
I love the elitism of those that don't play facehunter
So all of this talk about facehunter, I had to google it just to see what this is. Surprisingly, it looks like a fairly cheap deck to build. In fact, I kind of think I have all of the cards necessary to make it. Is it common? Because I don't think I've actually encountered a face hunter in ranked play yet. If I did they must have either played it wrong or gotten a really bad draw.
I think I'll make this deck tonight and try it out. Thanks NeoGAF!!!!
Cut out one Abusive Sergeant then. I think having two Abusive Sergeant is a bit much in the deck.
So all of this talk about facehunter, I had to google it just to see what this is. Surprisingly, it looks like a fairly cheap deck to build. In fact, I kind of think I have all of the cards necessary to make it. Is it common? Because I don't think I've actually encountered a face hunter in ranked play yet. If I did they must have either played it wrong or gotten a really bad draw.
I think I'll make this deck tonight and try it out. Thanks NeoGAF!!!!
So all of this talk about facehunter, I had to google it just to see what this is. Surprisingly, it looks like a fairly cheap deck to build. In fact, I kind of think I have all of the cards necessary to make it. Is it common? Because I don't think I've actually encountered a face hunter in ranked play yet. If I did they must have either played it wrong or gotten a really bad draw.
I think I'll make this deck tonight and try it out. Thanks NeoGAF!!!!
yes its common and one of the strongest decks in the meta
fk yeah broski! I always love playing more Face Hunters for faster games
Huh, no kidding. Well I'll try it out and see what it's like.
I wish we could save more than nine decks. Seems like a trivial thing, the deck list files can't be more than a few kilobytes in size each.
The only golden cards I'll ever craft are from adventures. There's no worse feeling than spending 400 dust on a golden classic common just to get that opened in a pack later. Disenchanting that golden is only 50 dust. Such bogus.
I know it gets joked about a lot but the deck size really bugs me, and is especially annoying around their adventures since you have to make your own gimmicky decks for the fight. I also accidentally went onto ladder with the Druid deck full of nothing but 7+ giant minions, lol.
Huh, no kidding. Well I'll try it out and see what it's like.
I wish we could save more than nine decks. Seems like a trivial thing, the deck list files can't be more than a few kilobytes in size each.
he ran out of juice quick
Wait, why do you have CoH there? Did one of you play Lorewalker?
Naxxramus golden cards so far:
x2 Webspinner
x2 Mad Scientist
x2 Haunted Creeper
x2 Sludge Belcher
Gonna craft Loatheb next and then I'll save for golden Emp. Balanced.
The only golden cards I'll ever craft are from adventures. There's no worse feeling than spending 400 dust on a golden classic common just to get that opened in a pack later. Disenchanting that golden is only 50 dust. Such bogus.
Consecrate, truesilver, and shielded minibot on turn 7. Thanks Emperor.
isn't there a youtube guy with all Golden cards in entire game??
not sure if that's legit, but I wonder how many games he's played that it took him to craft all those cards
Is the game meta now:
Emperor on Turn 6.
Dr. 7 on Turn 7.
Wow, in the last 20 packs I just got Hogger, Malygos and Mimiron's Head.
Hearthstone will probably not give me legendaries ever again.
Wow, in the last 20 packs I just got Hogger, Malygos and Mimiron's Head.
Hearthstone will probably not give me legendaries ever again.
Those are all fun cards, too. I ran hogger in paladin for a bit,
At least they're kind of fun legendaries. Game won't stop giving me copies of Velen and Dr Boom.
Is the game meta now:
Emperor on Turn 6.
Dr. 7 on Turn 7.
I feel like I'm playing in a different meta from everyone else.
I'm barely seeing anyone play Emperor on me. Not an overwhelming amount of Hunters either. Dr. Boom has all but vanished.
I'm actually really digging this meta - such a huge mix and variety of decks.