To be fair USB-C is an industry standard it just isn't quite ubiquitous yet.
this.
it's bad for early adopters, but absolutely needed to push adoption of the new standard.
Those mainboards with that one little USB-C on the back, those ultrabooks that have an USB-C alongside 3 regular sized USB ports really don't create the necessity for third parties to create devices that connect via USB-C.
Again, this will help push the adoption of USB-C, which should benefit the industry / the standard as whole. Whoever isn't ready / willing to accept that compromise in connectivity, better hold off from purchasing a macbook this year.
I hope Apple gets their shit together and figures out a streamlined approach to connectivity. Why does the mighty mouse (Mac accessory) charge with lightning, while the Macbook charges via USB-C, for example?
Why don't the new macbooks come with at least ONE lightning connector, when it's been kinda called the "wired fallback to the superior wireless option" during the iPhone 7 presentation.
It's disjointed and weird.
It feels like the Mac engineering team and the iPhone engineering team are having some weird feud that makes them unable to cooperate with one another, and it seems that they currently lack the leadership with a consistent vision. :/
The macbook itself is - while a bit overpriced - an impressive device. It just doesn't even fit into Apple's
own hardware ecosystem, in a way.