Thanks man. With those suggestions I can save about $100 and use that to get a much nicer graphics card.Hazaro said:955 and clock it to save some $
Get a 212+ instead. The 9500 is a terrible cooler unless you want it for looks (I had one).
Get 4GB of RAM instead. No need for 8 when gaming.
Samsung F3 1TB for drive
Drop PSU to 520W
Use saved money to get a 6950/GTX560
Cardigan said:Thanks man. With those suggestions I can save about $100 and use that to get a much nicer graphics card.
Got my wife that card and it kicks warcrafts ass. Can't say much else about it, I was Impressed enough to get an asus 460 1gig for 120 after rebate. Both work well but my display is 1080 hers isn't.BuddhaRockstar said:I might have to go with that 460 instead... but I gotta say the brand looks a little sketchy, does anyone have any experience with galaxy and their MIRs?
LaserBuddha said:Yeah saving a few bucks for 1gb less memory is not a good deal.
Naked Snake said:^ I'm gonna try to piggyback on your question with my own: Are there any affordable IPS monitors on the market today (US or UK)? The smaller the size and the higher the resolution the better. Budget $400-500?
Purpose: Photo editing.
A new line of budget IPS monitors has come out in the past year or so. They're e-IPS monitors and go for around $300. I'm using a NEC EA231WMi e-IPS display. Viewsonic and Dell also have e-IPS displays.Naked Snake said:^ I'm gonna try to piggyback on your question with my own: Are there any affordable IPS monitors on the market today (US or UK)? The smaller the size and the higher the resolution the better. Budget $400-500?
Purpose: Photo editing.
It's a $1000 on Dell's website...TouchMyBox said:If you can up your budget by $200, the Dell U2711 fits your wants and desires.
whatsinaname said:Has anyone else moved to Catalyst 11.2? (I think I am on 10.12). Any issues? Any improvements that I need to upgrade for?
They're for people that care about color accuracy. TN panels may have fast response times but they can only display 262k colors instead of the full 16 million. The colors a TN panel can't display it tries to fake through dithering. An IPS display also doesn't color shift when viewed off angle.ChoklitReign said:Is an IPS really necessary for gaming? I thought they appeal mostly to graphics designers.
pestul said:Yep. Works with my i7 920 D0 Stepping. I have her at 4.05GHz and she runs idling at 2.5 or so GHz. Not a hitch and its been on those settings for well over a year now. I have problems with S3 sleep state in Windows 7, but there are a lot of factors involved there (Videocard, Windows 7, ASUS Motherboard etc.). I don't think it's solely related to my overclock. Give it a go, can't hurt to try. Test the stability with the features off and then see if it works.
TouchMyBox said:If you can up your budget by $200, the Dell U2711 fits your wants and desires.
vazel said:A new line of budget IPS monitors has come out in the past year or so. They're e-IPS monitors and go for around $300. I'm using a NEC EA231WMi e-IPS display. Viewsonic and Dell also have e-IPS displays.
ShyGuy0504 said:So I've been thinking about getting a second monitor, but I'm worried it might affect my performance in games. I won't be using the second monitor for gaming, just to extend my desktop. I have an HD 5850. The monitor will be the same size as my current one which is a 23" 1080p. Would I see any fps drops in games if I did this?
Horrible. Not even Sandy Bridge and a 460 for $1.4k??? Insane price for something that isn't that great spec wise to be honest. Sure the SSD is decent, but everything else is just middling at best.Kraftwerk said:a friend sent me this link earlier. Thoughts?
http://www.ibuypower.com/Store/2011_Paladin_Dr._I
For games like witcher 2 and skyrim. Will get a second monitor sometime in future for it.
I bought an iBuyPower computer about 6 years ago and had a terrible experience. Crappy components and the machine broke after several months. When I called support it was an Indian guy sitting in what sounded like a server room and he was absolutely no help. I have also heard bad things about them from other people. Unless they've upped their quality lately, I would never buy from them again.Kraftwerk said:a friend sent me this link earlier. Thoughts?
http://www.ibuypower.com/Store/2011_Paladin_Dr._I
For games like witcher 2 and skyrim. Will get a second monitor sometime in future for it.
Kraftwerk said:a friend sent me this link earlier. Thoughts?
http://www.ibuypower.com/Store/2011_Paladin_Dr._I
For games like witcher 2 and skyrim. Will get a second monitor sometime in future for it.
Naked Snake said:^ I'm gonna try to piggyback on your question with my own: Are there any affordable IPS monitors on the market today (US or UK)? The smaller the size and the higher the resolution the better. Budget $400-500?
Purpose: Photo editing.
MacAttack said:Im certainly not one of the experts you are referring to, but why waste good money on a dedicated physX card when that money could be allocated elsewhere?
Is there a specific game you play that you need it for?
ReturnOfTheRAT said:Don't waste money and time with them or CyberPower. If you want a well built PC check out DigitalStormOnline.
whatsinaname said:Has anyone else moved to Catalyst 11.2? (I think I am on 10.12). Any issues? Any improvements that I need to upgrade for?
Kraftwerk said:a friend sent me this link earlier. Thoughts?
http://www.ibuypower.com/Store/2011_Paladin_Dr._I
For games like witcher 2 and skyrim. Will get a second monitor sometime in future for it.
vazel said:A new line of budget IPS monitors has come out in the past year or so. They're e-IPS monitors and go for around $300. I'm using a NEC EA231WMi e-IPS display. Viewsonic and Dell also have e-IPS displays.
Outdoor Miner said:It absolutely is if you game at 1680 and are probably going to upgrade your video card in 12-18 months anyway.
pestul said:Yep. Works with my i7 920 D0 Stepping. I have her at 4.05GHz and she runs idling at 2.5 or so GHz. Not a hitch and its been on those settings for well over a year now. I have problems with S3 sleep state in Windows 7, but there are a lot of factors involved there (Videocard, Windows 7, ASUS Motherboard etc.). I don't think it's solely related to my overclock. Give it a go, can't hurt to try. Test the stability with the features off and then see if it works.
luiztfc said:Necessary specs:
13' to 15' inches screen
nice keyboard
excellent battery
good processor/ram/hd
blu ray
I already game at my pc.
Budget: not too tight, but I don't want to spend more than the necessary.
I'm not trolling here, but I've been thinking of buying a MB Pro. Problem is that I don't like OSX and would have difficult adapting. However, if I were to run Win 7 natively I could justify the purchase. Is it possible?
I got this monitor on buy.com deal for $170 and I don't notice any issue with gaming. The 14 ms response time on EA231WMi is based on a black-white-black measurement and the response time on the other monitors, like Dell, are based on a grey-grey measurement which is more realistic. And, it has very low input lag (delay on signal) compare to other monitors.Laekon said:How is the e-IPS monitors for gaming? the NEC has a 14ms response time which is double a regular TN panel monitor.
Yes, you can run Windows natively on a Mac using Boot Camp. You can set it to boot straight in to Windows and you wouldn't even know it had OS X.luiztfc said:I'm not trolling here, but I've been thinking of buying a MB Pro. Problem is that I don't like OSX and would have difficult adapting. However, if I were to run Win 7 natively I could justify the purchase. Is it possible?
But aren't the top end cards already dual GPU, just in one card rather than two? Do they have the same problems as a dual card setup?TheExodu5 said:I doubt I'll ever go SLI again. While it's nice in some games, it's just an added headache, and the microstuttering in Rift has really disappointed me. I couldn't believe that a GTX 275 felt almost as smooth as my 2x GTX 570 due to the microstuttering. I think that if I had to redo it, I might consider a GTX 580 with an Accelero Xtreme Plus instead. Who knows though...maybe my performance would drop a lot more than I think it would in some games.
-viper- said:When are the new (fixed) SB motherboards going to be released?
-viper- said:When are the new (fixed) SB motherboards going to be released?
TheExodu5 said:The AX850 is really nice, and sleeved cables look nice, but they're a bit of a pain to work with. I think a non-sleeved alternative might be preferable if I were to go with a mid tower case. Besides look, there doesn't really seem to be any benefit to sleeving...it just makes cable management harder. The stress the sleeves put on the connectors makes me uncomfortable as well (when I try to pull the cables back to make it look clean).
Foliorum Viridum said:AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Socket AM3 3.2 GHz 6MB
ASUS M4A78LT-M LE AMD 760G Socket AM3 DVI VGA Out 8 Channel Audio MATX Motherboard
Kingston 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 1066MHz i5 Memory Kit 1.5V CL7
XFX ATI Radeon HD 5850 1024MB
620W PSU 120mm Fan 20+4pin 2x SATA
This is my current PC. It's doing quite well, but I feel the CPU in particular is starting to hold me back. I'm thinking if I upgrade my CPU/Mobo this year it will bump my performance quite a bit, and then maybe I can think of getting a 2gb GPU next year. I've also just bought 8gb of RAM since it was on offer (
OCZ Special OPS 8GB (4x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C8 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit) which I can't use in my mobo so that's another reason to update.
My question is what would you guys reccomend? I was obviously thinking of a Sandy Bridge combo and OCing that to 4ghz+, but is that a more "future proof" way to go than getting a hex core CPU and OCing that to a lesser speed? If the hex core isn't worth it I'm happy to spend £300 on Sandy Bridge!
Thanks![]()
teh_pwn said:I don't think either your CPU or GPU alone are holding you back. Both are. They are paired up well for each component's performance. If you got a high end video card, then your CPU probably would be holding you back 20-40%. If you got a new CPU without changing the video card, you probably wouldn't get a big boost. Like 3-4 fps. The vast majority of calculations for gaming take place on the GPU.
Whether or not to upgrade/rebuild really depends on what games/apps you're going to use, the timeframe, how much money you're willing to spend.
In my case I built a system roughly equal to yours last year, but I decided I wanted to build a high end PC for new games, TV/Movie streaming, blu-ray player without the mandatory ads, etc. It's going in my living room.
Personally I don't get overclocking for gaming. I see the GPU is really where most of the performance is determined, and then I get a CPU that keeps up. Overclocking increases heat and can decrease reliability. And for what, 3 fps? I'd focus money/design on the GPU/PSU/airflow-noise.
I mean, just look how little processors matter here:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/50
The 2500k actually beats the 2600k here, despite the 2600k being about 40% faster in applications. I bet if you put a larger GPU in here (or 2) and increased the resolution, then you'd see the 2600k beat the 2500k. The GPU is the primary bottleneck.
And how much GPUs and multi-GPUs matter here:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/GPU11/188