Hey guys! So for my computer architecture class, I was assigned to recommend a computer system for 30 graphics designers of a fictional company. Using Hazaro's spreadsheet, here's what I've come up with:
With a budget of $23,255:
Graphics Card - AMD Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 3GB
CPU - Intel i5 3350P 4C
Motherboard - MSI B75MA-P45
RAM - Corsair Vengeance 1.35V / 1.5V 2x4GB (8GB)
Storage - 2TB Seagate ST2000VN000
Casing - NZXT Source 210
Keyboard - Logitech Media Keyboard K200
Mouse - CM Storm Xornet
All these cost a total of $20,700 which leaves me with $2555 to work with the software they will use (aside -- does anyone know of an example of what graphics designers use to make graphics? like a general photoshop but for game graphics design?).
What do you guys think? Are these parts good for a feasible computer system?
Seems a tight budget for what they really need which is Quadro GPUs, Socket 2011 CPUs and probably more RAM too.
Build two high end socket 2011 systems that are shared render computers + one high speed NAS and have basic prebuilt lenovos with a low profile gpu for the rest.
Maybe look into cloud computing services instead. And don't a lot of artists use WACOM tablets?
This seems more like a computer for 3D modeling and rendering.
So Quadro GPUs are superior compared to the Radeon when it comes to designing graphics?
So Quadro GPUs are superior compared to the Radeon when it comes to designing graphics?
Depends on the software whether to go FirePro or Quadro.
Depends on the software whether to go FirePro or Quadro.
Pretty much what kharma said. Would need to know which software specifically to be able to look up what works best with it.
I asked my prof. and he said some examples of software this fictional company may use are "mental ray, Grome and 3ds Max". Any of those three ring a bell?
Need your help PC GAF.
I have a power supply cable going over the EVGA 780 ACX. There is no other way around it. Will the heat coming up the pipes degrade the cable?
Shouldn't, unless the sheathing is made out of some exteremely cheap material.
I've ordered the additional EVGA 680 Classified, can anybody recommend a power supply that will be sufficient for:
Motherboard - Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3
CPU - Intel Core i7 3820
CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i
Overclock - 4.4Ghz
RAM - Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB 2100 MHz
CPU - 4GB EVGA GTX 680 Classified X2
System Drive - 2TB Seagate Barracuda, SATA 6Gb/s, 7200rpm, 64MB Cache
DVD Drive - Samsung SH-224BB - 24X DVD Writer
SSD - 256GB SanDisk Ultra Plus
Case - Corsair 550D
Thanks
I've ordered the additional EVGA 680 Classified, can anybody recommend a power supply that will be sufficient for:
Motherboard - Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3
CPU - Intel Core i7 3820
CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i
Overclock - 4.4Ghz
RAM - Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB 2100 MHz
CPU - 4GB EVGA GTX 680 Classified X2
System Drive - 2TB Seagate Barracuda, SATA 6Gb/s, 7200rpm, 64MB Cache
DVD Drive - Samsung SH-224BB - 24X DVD Writer
SSD - 256GB SanDisk Ultra Plus
Case - Corsair 550D
Thanks
Budget?
I asked my prof. and he said some examples of software this fictional company may use are "mental ray, Grome and 3ds Max". Any of those three ring a bell?
Second, theres a very real chance that you will destroy your CPU in the process. Roughly 25% of all delids result in the destruction of the CPU.
get the 4670K, the other CPUs don't even come close to it. Not sure what shorter lifespan they are talking about. They run a little warmer than Sandy and Ivy, but that's only in the high overclocks.
PC Watch found thermal interface material – paste – instead of the fluxless solder Intel’s public relations department claimed. The difference between the two materials is pronounced. Fluxless solder doesn’t decay or dry out over time, whereas thermal compound, or TIM, loses its efficacy slowly. TIM can become desiccated in as little as two years, depending on the quality. This suggests that all Intel CPUs will experience a subtle creeping up of temperatures and, eventually, death.
... that reads like IS THE DRINKING WATER DANGEROUS FOR YOUR CHILDREN - FIND OUT TONIGHT AT 11
There's nothing wrong with the build quality unless you're trying to push super massive overclocks. Yes delidding is an option. But mostly people are upset because the Sandy Bridge ones were SO RIDICULOUSLY well made that everything else doesn't look as good.
Well it's this part that has me worried:
But perhaps getting worked up over nothing. 4670k was the clear choice before I stumbled upon that article.
Edit:
Yeah that is kind of what I am thinking. It didn't really help that the guide over at Reddits /r/pcmasterrace pushed heavily for AMD over Intel (mostly because of that article), but they're practically the only ones doing so. I'm not really gonna bother with OCing anyhow.
You have these articles backing up the somewhat trashy article I originally linked:It's a link bait article with nothing backing it.
The horror! Having to get another CPU in around five years. Most people do this anyway, if not sooner. Also liked where he said "shorter life expediences". Looks legit.the revelation suggests that Intel CPUs may not last longer than three to five years before succumbing to overheating.
You have these articles backing up the somewhat trashy article I originally linked:
http://vr-zone.com/articles/ivy-bridge-proven-to-suffer-from-poor-thermal-grease/15844.html
http://www.techpowerup.com/165882/tim-is-behind-ivy-bridge-temperatures-after-all.html
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Inte...e-Better-Overclocking-in-Haswell-293719.shtml
Not sure how much (if at all really) it's already been mentioned in this thread, but when considering air flow in your case, you might really consider going for static pressure fans for the intake as opposed to the standard air flow fan. Basically for radiators and any fans that have a mesh, filter or obstructions like hard drives to deal with, air flow loses a lot of ground since they are designed to move air unimpeded. The exhaust fan(s) can be either really, unless it too has a filter of some kind, although I haven't seen any cases that do.
To keep dust down as well as cooling off graphics cards that do not have a completely enclosed cooling solution (many, if not most Nvidia cards) easier, a positive pressure setup is the way to go as well. You want more intake fans (or pressure/flow rather) than exhaust to do this.
Negative pressure in some cases can offer superior cooling (slight advantage), but at the cost of being a dust magnet since it pulls in air from all of the cracks of your case and not just the filtered intake areas. This is where you have more exhaust than intake.
The horror! Having to get another CPU in around five years. Most people do this anyway, if not sooner. Also liked where he said "shorter life expediences". Looks legit.
I'm gonna wait for a price cut before I even consider it, but would it be worth it to plop the extra $$ for a 760 4GB over the stock 2GB one for 1080p gaming?
You have these articles backing up the somewhat trashy article I originally linked:
http://vr-zone.com/articles/ivy-bridge-proven-to-suffer-from-poor-thermal-grease/15844.html
http://www.techpowerup.com/165882/tim-is-behind-ivy-bridge-temperatures-after-all.html
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Inte...e-Better-Overclocking-in-Haswell-293719.shtml
At the same time the fx-8350 shows comparable results to the 3570k (which is more or less comparable to an fx-8320 vs a 4670k), while at the same time being a lot cheaper (where I live, prices being roughly $260 vs $200).
So I'm still a bit undecided if it's worth it to pay extra for the 4670k when the FX-8320 will perform similarly for a better price, and might even perform better once proper multi threading becomes standard. Take the articles as you will, but the potential poor build quality doesn't speak in Intel's favor, regardless of if it will actually have any impact or not. I'm not one to upgrade very often, however, so longevity is kind of important to me. I'm kind of learning as I go here, though, so I might be completely off base.
I've had a few drinks so I'll keep this concise, stick to Intel.
No, save your money
The GPU and Memory bus is not specced to handle the extra memory efficiently and there are zero benchmarks which show performance improvements with the 4GB editions.
Money is no object eh?im putting together a new gaming pc and was wanting some help
- money isnt really an issue
- i plan to go SLI when i need it, hence the big power supply
- i have an existing 60gb SSD which i was going to install windows on, and then the SSD below for games
- i dont know anything about cooling, or heatsinks. could someone pls make some suggestions?
CPU: i7-4770K 3.4ghz
Mobo: Asus Z87-PRO
RAM: Kingston 2 x 8GB
GFX: 3GB 780 GTX - MSI
Case: Antec P280-W Black
Power supply: Antec HCG-850M
DVD-RW: Samsung
HDD: Samsung 840 EVO 250GB, WD Black 2TB
O/S: Windows 8 Home OEM
Cooling: ???
Heatsink: ???
Thanks
im pretty sure they over rate PSU's to take into account low rent shit power supplies.