Is this new wave of banning video games really the new road?

Way to miss the woods for the trees. Nobody said it doesn't have rape but again take the example of kayne and lynch.

"From the creators of Hitman comes Kane & Lynch ... Lynch, a medicated psychopath, Kane a flawed mercenary. Grittier and nastier in tone than anything you've seen before, the violence here is visceral, brutal and very, very real"

Is Kane and Lynch a "murder simulator" and not a game? It doesn't mean somebody who plays that goes and shoots innocent people up with a shotgun in real life.


Believe it or not, there's a lot of people in position of power and legislature who genuinely believe that.

The point being, labeling the game as what it describes itself is not 'belittling' its existence. You're free to belittle Kane and Lynch and other games that promote violence, no one's stopping you. But I'm strictly using the verbiage the developer of the game provided himself.
 
Last edited:
Um nobody mentioned little kids but since we're going there lets ban violent games too then. You with me?
I already answered that one:
if you can`t differentiate between something that happens on the side in a game and something that a game is purposefully designed for front left and center then you should probably not be allowed to use sharp knives for your own safety.
And we arbitrarily draw the line with little kids? But Rape is ok? If both are videogames "no one is harmed", as you put it, so everything should be ok, right?

Kermit The Frog No GIF by Muppet Wiki
 
Last edited:
Believe it or not, there's a lot of people in position of power and legislature who genuinely believe that.

The point being, labeling the game as what it describes itself is not 'belittling' its existence. You're free to belittle Kane and Lynch and other games that promote violence, no one's stopping you. But I'm strictly using the verbiage the developer of the game provided himself.
Yes and the verbiage of developers promote realistic violence too with many examples like manhunt and Kane and Lynch included. The point wasn't that it doesn't include those questionable things it was to show that even games that some may have no problem with that allow you to murder people don't get reduced to such things as murder simulators. Let people play what they want. It was to try and show that even if some may have no interest in it, myself included, it shouldn't really be banned. Games have murder in them and they're not.
 
I already answered that one:

And we arbitrarily draw the line with little kids? But Rape is ok? If both are videogames "no one is harmed", as you put it, so everything should be ok, right?

It gets more stupid by the minute.
No because one is in fact illegal believe it or not but rape much like murder in a videogame is not. There are things you are legally allowed to depict in film and videogames and those are allowed. Any other argument is your own morals yet it doesn't seem to apply to murder it seems.
 
No because one is in fact illegal believe it or not but rape much like murder in a videogame is not. There are things you are legally allowed to depict in film and videogames and those are allowed. Any other argument is your own morals yet it doesn't seem to apply to murder it seems.
if you can`t differentiate between something that happens on the side in a game and something that a game is purposefully designed for front left and center then you should probably not be allowed to use sharp knives for your own safety.
 
Yes and the verbiage of developers promote realistic violence too with many examples like manhunt and Kane and Lynch included. The point wasn't that it doesn't include those questionable things it was to show that even games that some may have no problem with that allow you to murder people don't get reduced to such things as murder simulators. Let people play what they want. It was to try and show that even if some may have no interest in it, myself included, it shouldn't really be banned. Games have murder in them and they're not.
I personally have no problem with this game or any of those porn game existing on Steam since they are backed into their own little very low populated corner and doesn't try to force their views on others like certain insane groups out there but at the same time I also have no problem if this as well as all other porn game over there gets removed. Because all of them are probably shitty games with no gameplay cause one those games are already very low budget and two they put all those low budget in their porn scenes. Even that new Dead or Alive Bleach game which isn't a porn game doesn't appeal to me because there's no actual gameplay and I need games to have some gameplay with some story/lore and interesting enemies designs or to fight against. So all those porn games can get wiped out for all I care.
 
Last edited:
Yes and the verbiage of developers promote realistic violence too with many examples like manhunt and Kane and Lynch included. The point wasn't that it doesn't include those questionable things it was to show that even games that some may have no problem with that allow you to murder people don't get reduced to such things as murder simulators. Let people play what they want. It was to try and show that even if some may have no interest in it, myself included, it shouldn't really be banned. Games have murder in them and they're not.

Huh ... there have been plenty of hearing, controversies etc about that very subject. If you're saying that no one has ever called a shooter game a murder simulator, you are very much wrong and you know it.

But just like how 'gamers' unanimously don't call shooters 'murder simulators', you're not seeing 'gamers' unanimously here call this game a rape simulator either. You alone are proof of that.

Let's not assume that violence in video games has never been brought up as a controversial issue.
 
Last edited:
I swear the compulsion to debate "anything between consenting adults should be allowed" has left the realm of logic and reason and is now just a compulsive thought exercise with no grounding in reality or even an understanding of why it's done. "I'm not a virtual rapist but I'll defend them until my last breath."

Some old 90s programming that some people are still running for reasons they don't even understand.
 
Huh ... there have been plenty of hearing, controversies etc about that very subject. If you're saying that no one has ever called a shooter game a murder simulator, you are very much wrong and you know it.

But just like how 'gamers' unanimously don't call shooters 'murder simulators', you're not seeing 'gamers' unanimously here call this game a rape simulator either. You alone are proof of that.

Let's not assume that violence in video games has never been brought up as a controversial issue.
Nobody said people like Jack Thompson didn't exist. I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that nobody has ever called games murder simulators before from. Nobody is making that argument. I'm making the argument that people who call for these games like GTA, Manhunt etc to be banned are no different to somebody who is now calling for these bans for "rape simulators" but you seem to miss the point all too often.
 
Last edited:
So you think games just get a free pass to do anything and everything because "no one is harmed" irl? Ok then.
Yes I think censorship should not really be a thing unless it is law (like your kiddies example you keep trying to push). This isn't law, it should be allowed even if you or I have no interest in it. It's a simple concept.
 
Nobody said people like Jack Thompson didn't exist. I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that nobody has ever called games murder simulators before from. Nobody is making that argument. I'm making the argument that people who call for these games like GTA, Manhunt etc to be banned are no different to somebody who is now calling for these bans for "rape simulators" but you seem to miss the point all too often.
You don't see a difference between rape simulators and GTA?
 
Yes I think censorship should not really be a thing unless it is law (like your kiddies example you keep trying to push). This isn't law, it should be allowed even if you or I have no interest in it. It's a simple concept.
The law isn`t perfect. Just because certain depravities aren`t strictly forbidden doesn`t mean they should be tolerated or should not trigger a push to get the law adjusted.
 
Yes I think censorship should not really be a thing unless it is law (like your kiddies example you keep trying to push). This isn't law, it should be allowed even if you or I have no interest in it. It's a simple concept.
Rape is against the law. And so is Murder but as a society we have a different view on that compared to things that involve sex, if you can't see why then perhaps you need to research it a bit more as to why rape and paedophillia is socially looked down on more compared to murder.
 
So I guess the question now is: WHO gets to decides morality in fictional content?

I think common sense. I get that there's some hypocrisy involved when it comes to this subject due to killing in games so I get that but I dunno Killing baddies in a game sits different than a game based on assaulting and raping women,it's just to me not anything necessary.

I don't think it's normal tho for anyone to have rape fantasys, just as a general thought.
 
People getting riled up over the removal of a fucking rape simulator have more than just one screw loose.
I'm not "defending" rape, but if we follow this logic, how is murder any better than rape? Murder is portrayed in almost every games out there, and people are fine with that, while it's something as bad / worse than rape.
I find it strange how some terrible things are commonly accepted why others can't even be mentioned, there are some twisted values in our society and medias.

Personally, I think that everything should be allowed to exist as fiction as long as it's fiction and doesn't hurt anyone. I think it might actually be good for things like this to exist, so it can be some kind of outlet for people who might have some kinks / pulsion like this, better to do that in games rather than in reality.

One thing we can consider though is, should games like this be on Steam. It would maybe be better to have a seperate, adult focused version of steam or something like that instead of this being merged with everything else. However, I think that you won't see these games as long as you don't enable the option to show adult only games.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it's normal tho for anyone to have rape fantasys, just as a general thought.
As a side note...you`d be very surprised how many women have those exact fantasies and how far those go. I had one girlfriend that asked me to have sex with her while holding a knife to her throat......the psychological abysses in some very normal looking people are astounding at times. And that wasn`t the only one with fantasies in that direction.
Sarah Silverman Eww GIF by HULU

not my nicest memories.
 
Last edited:
The law isn`t perfect. Just because certain depravities aren`t strictly forbidden doesn`t mean they should be tolerated or should not trigger a push to get the law adjusted.
Yes Jack Thompson tried the same thing. Luckily there are sane people out there that know these things don't mean people will commit actual acts of violence.

Rape is against the law. And so is Murder but as a society we have a different view on that compared to things that involve sex, if you can't see why then perhaps you need to research it a bit more as to why rape and paedophillia is socially looked down on more compared to murder.
Depictions of rape and murder in media isn't against the law, child porn is so I was just pointing out where the line is drawn. Any other line is Schmendrick's own line or that of other individuals.
 
I'm not "defending" rape, but if we follow this logic, how is murder any better than rape? Murder is portrayed in almost every games out there, and people are fine with that, while it's something as bad / worse than rape.
I find it strange how some terrible things are commonly accepted why others can't even be mentioned, there are some twisted values in our society and medias.

Personally, I think that everything should be allowed to exist as fiction as long as it's fiction and doesn't hurt anyone. I think it might actually be good for things like this to exist, so it can be some kind of outlet for people who might have some kinks / pulsion like this, better to do that in games rather than in reality.

One thing we can consider though is, should games like this be on Steam. It would maybe be better to have a seperate, adult focused version of steam or something like that instead of this being merged with everything else.
Like i said I think the concept inherently of killing the "bad guys" just sits different, as I said above there's definitely hypocrisy in there I get that but with what you're saying then a game based on hunting kids and molesting them in the name of a "fantasy", know what I mean?
 
A meltdown because a Rape simulator is removed from a mainstream platform ?
No, it's because of censorship and double standards.


I am all for freedom of creativity but I don't see what Rape game brings. Let's do some pedo game or children murder game...
Depiction of rape in media and art is legal. Depiction of minors in any sexual way is illegal.


I get that some people get some weird kink but there is some limit to it in my opinion.
Keep it for yourself. You don't get to decide what other adults jack off too when they act within the law.
 
In the grand scheme no, because you're promoting violence and crime there too. If people enjoy that in a fantasy setting let them. Doesn't mean they're going to actually do those things.
One promotes sexual violence against the innocent and the other is infighting among thieves. And even then, there is a clear moral distinction between the GTA protagonists and the "bad guys" they're fighting.
 
Last edited:
I think common sense. I get that there's some hypocrisy involved when it comes to this subject due to killing in games so I get that but I dunno Killing baddies in a game sits different than a game based on assaulting and raping women,it's just to me not anything necessary.

I don't think it's normal tho for anyone to have rape fantasys, just as a general thought.
See, this is the problem: assuming things about people based on their defending free thought in fiction. Anyways, I'm not going to waste any more time discussing this subject, because some people will never change their beliefs, and always try to impose their views on others.
 
As a side note...you`d be very surprised how many women have those exact fantasies and how far those go. I had one girlfriend that asked me to have sex with her while holding a knife to her throat......the psychological abysses in some very normal looking people are astounding at times.
Oh I get it and I agree but I still think it stands both ways if a girl is fantasizing about that she's fucked up lol
 
One promotes sexual violence against the innocent and the other is infighting among thieves. And even then, there is a clear moral distinctions between the GTA protagonists and the "bad guys" they're fighting.
You fucking shoot cops at the beginning of the game. Don't give me this bullshit.
 
See, this is the problem: assuming things about people based on their defending free thought in fiction. Anyways, I'm not going to waste any more time discussing this subject, because some people will never change their beliefs, and always try to impose their views on others.
Im simply tryin to find the line. Because the point I'm making is where is the line then in the sake of fantasy? As I said why can't someone then make a game that plays out their fanrasy of molesting children? I'm not tryin to accuse anyone just saying where is the line
 
Last edited:
Murder is portrayed in almost every games out there, and people are fine with that, while it's something as bad / worse than rape.
Because that's how society is, when it involves sex it becomes a different thing, like we can go to the cinema and watch action movies like Rambo cutting off arms, shooting the fuck out of people, but cinemas won't show porn.
 
Like i said I think the concept inherently of killing the "bad guys" just sits different, as I said above there's definitely hypocrisy in there I get that but with what you're saying then a game based on hunting kids and molesting them in the name of a "fantasy", know what I mean?
Maybe the people you rape in this game are bad guys? Just kidding :messenger_tears_of_joy:
I get what you mean, but then in games like GTA and others you can kill "good" random persons too, not just bad guys, so there's still this comparable issue.
I understand what you mean, but it's hard to draw the line.
 
Im simply tryin to find the line. Because the point I'm making is where is the line then in the sake of fantasy? As I said why can't someone then make a game that plays out their fanrasy of molesting children? I'm not tryin to accuse anyone just saying where is the line
Last thing I'll say on the matter: the line, as you put it, is up to each individual.
 
Hope the same people defending censorship of some games aren't the ones raging when a game character gets changed from a revealing to a modest costume. Or complaining female characters are being beaten with the ugly stick.

Don't like something, don't play it. Stop trying to restrict what games other people make or play.
 
Maybe the people you rape in this game are bad guys? Just kidding :messenger_tears_of_joy:
I get what you mean, but then in games like GTA and others you can kill "good" random persons too, not just bad guys, so there's still this comparable issue.
I understand what you mean, but it's hard to draw the line.
Haha 😂 yea like I said theres like this weird line and hypocrisy involved. It's overall a subject that I just think could be debated forever as I don't think there's a true answer.

Ultimately I think this shouid be on Steam for saying nah we don't need that, I guess to me I don't think I can go to bat to hard for a game like that but if that makes me a hypocrite it's like I'll just have to accept it. But yea man I agree weird and hard line to draw
 
No, it's because of censorship and double standards.


??

Steam didn't remove the game, the developer chose to do it himself. He could have kept the game and Steam would have allowed it, they still allow Hatred on the platform too, for example.


We've made the decision to withdraw "No Mercy" from Steam.

Zerat Games

From the game's community hub on Steam, not gonna link it cause it has NSFW imagery, but folks can find it themselves pretty easily.
 
Last edited:
Hope the same people defending censorship of some games aren't the ones raging when a game character gets changed from a revealing to a modest costume. Or complaining female characters are being beaten with the ugly stick.

Don't like something, don't play it. Stop trying to restrict what games other people make or play.
I think those are so many different convos man, like I couldn't care less about revealing sexy attire for female chars but I also dont want to be playing no ugly dudes or bitches 😅
 
Maybe the people you rape in this game are bad guys? Just kidding :messenger_tears_of_joy:
I get what you mean, but then in games like GTA and others you can kill "good" random persons too, not just bad guys, so there's still this comparable issue.
I understand what you mean, but it's hard to draw the line.
Raping someone is an act of selfishness at its core. You are overstepping someone's boundaries because you want to exert power over them, and you do so sexually without regard for any physical or mental repercussions.

Murdering someone has a purpose. A very existentially cruel purpose, but at the end of the day a purpose. Maybe they're an inherent danger to society and can't be let alive without knowing they would commit more crimes. You off them.
or maybe someone at night comes toward you with a knife, but you have a gun. it'd be very over the top to murder them, but it's still somethig that could be justified, or at least empathized with.
Murder is still bad when done unjustly, but there is that rare slim chance of it being a good thing, that rape simply does not have.

you can't ever really justify rape. There's no purpose for doing it other than to be cruel.
 
Last edited:
No because one is in fact illegal believe it or not but rape much like murder in a videogame is not. There are things you are legally allowed to depict in film and videogames and those are allowed. Any other argument is your own morals yet it doesn't seem to apply to murder it seems.

Is pedophilia illegal in fiction?

Have you read Lolita?

You fucking shoot cops at the beginning of the game. Don't give me this bullshit.

Yet, GTA still has a moral line. You don't see children in GTA. Why is that?
 
The players have changed but the game is the same. In the 90s there would've been conservative christians telling us Lara Croft is inappropriate. Now intersectional feminists complain about it instead.

One thng I do know. Gamers, who happen to be nearly all men, were a lot happier before their niche hobby was invaded by groups like Women In Games.
 
History has proven that if you have no morality in what society consumes the morality in real life becomes less and people become desensitized. We are basically close to full on idiocracy as it is today.


What's so dumb about it is everyone thinks it's " progressive " like we never had this " freedom " before. Like all of time before was this super uptight religious state like in 40s and 50s .when really we have mostly had chaos, violence, and over sexualization through out human history and it got so bad at times that if didn't destroy your country completely then the people finally had to do a complete 180 to survive with long periods of poverty and plague following.
 
I think those are so many different convos man, like I couldn't care less about revealing sexy attire for female chars but I also dont want to be playing no ugly dudes or bitches 😅
You haven't seen the countless posts and videos ragefarming about X character being censored to appease whatever moral outrage crowd? Any of those people now defending banning video games when there are themes they personally don't like, is pure hypocrisy.
 
You haven't seen the countless posts and videos ragefarming about X character being censored to appease whatever moral outrage crowd? Any of those people now defending banning video games when there are themes they personally don't like, is pure hypocrisy.
I hear that but to me there's just a huge gap.. Again I'm waitin for someone to answer me that with this logic you're good with pedophilic games?
 
In the grand scheme no, because you're promoting violence and crime there too. If people enjoy that in a fantasy setting let them. Doesn't mean they're going to actually do those things.

GTA is rated Mature by the ESRB

This No Mercy game would have an AO rating if the ESRB got their hands on it.

Big difference.

Kids go to arcades and play Rambo where they shoot up lots of 'bad guys'. Doesn't make it similar to playing a rape simulator.
 
GTA is rated Mature by the ESRB

This No Mercy game would have an AO rating if the ESRB got their hands on it.

Big difference.

Kids go to arcades and play Rambo where they shoot up lots of 'bad guys'. Doesn't make it similar to playing a rape simulator.

Don't forget, the one time a GTA game got an AO rating (san andreas) it was swiftly removed from retail too, essentially the same kind of "ban" that's being talked about here.

So, these games do get treated the same at the same age rating after all 🤷‍♂️
 
GTA is rated Mature by the ESRB

This No Mercy game would have an AO rating if the ESRB got their hands on it.

Big difference.

Kids go to arcades and play Rambo where they shoot up lots of 'bad guys'. Doesn't make it similar to playing a rape simulator.
If it was rated it means it is legal for that age rating. Nobody is talking about the ratings being the same. Only that it's promoting a different type of violence and crime nonetheless.
 
Top Bottom