Nirolak said:The forum auto scales to a 90 pixel width, so you need to pixel pad it or resize the image and chop off some pixels.
Clipper said:You need to host somewhere other than glowfoto.
charlequin said:Aaaah, that'd do it. jetjevons, just use the tinypic version linked on the last page.
Yep, it's OK. Put it in your CP and you should be good for 'quin to fix you up.Slayer-33 said:Is it ok now? 90x120
![]()
I was silly, all I needed to do was paste my re-sized selection inside a 90x120 box :lol
90x120, about 126kb. I don't see why not...xxracerxx said:![]()
I believe this is the correct size/dimension as I used to use it back in the day. Will someone double check for me please?
90/120=0.75. Anything with a width/height value which is greater than or equal to that ratio will scale to a height less than 120 pixels at 90 width.Gravijah said:What's the >=.75 part mean? Can't be less than .75 the size of 90x120?
Yes, it's fine.xxracerxx said:![]()
I believe this is the correct size/dimension as I used to use it back in the day. Will someone double check for me please?
The kitty is doing the laundry.Yasae said:90x120, about 126kb. I don't see why not...
Is the poor thing making pizza dough or something? Did its paws get stuck?
Thanks both of you for checking mine.Clipper said:Yes, it's fine.
You have to wait until one of the mods checks the thread.xxracerxx said:Everything should be good on my end, looks like I missed out though.
Gravijah said:edit:nvm
IrishNinja said:hey your avatar lost its colors bro
The width divided by the height has to be a number greater than or equal to 0.75, or otherwise the forum will resize it to something that's too tall.Gravijah said:What's the >=.75 part mean? Can't be less than .75 the size of 90x120?
redbarchetta said:Can my avatar please be switched back, pretty please? It's already been updated in my CP, and I think it conforms to everything.
![]()
There you go.xxracerxx said:![]()
I believe this is the correct size/dimension as I used to use it back in the day. Will someone double check for me please?
Nirolak said:There you go.
Yoshichan said:It really fucks up with my brain.
Gravijah said:it's in honor of michael jackson
Clint is ever grateful!charlequin said:flyntstryker, you're all set. jetjevons, something went wrong on your end. :lol try again to set the NIGHTS avatar in your User CP and I'll fix you up afterwards.
You're losing your avatar privileges for a bit because you didn't bother to check whether yours scaled up above the limit.
Not without an extreme loss of quality. That sucker is over 1,000 KBs.John Harker said:I suppose my dancing Turk avatar got the axe
My bad. It was an (awesome) gift. I've had it a year.
Is it fixable?
$200 said:Can anyone help with this one:
Thanks a lot :]]
MarkMclovin said:<---- Is this the right place to request this to be changed back?
MarkMclovin said:<---- Is this the right place to request this to be changed back?
LaserBuddha said:I've completed step 3.
Let it shine.
![]()
Sure do wish someone could help me make it look as clean and background-free as the original though...
charlequin said:Nope. Sins against Wii Homebrew are punished by a greater god than I.
He wasn't first. That goes to another poster who was already complaining earlier in this thread. He might have been the second, though; it was an early one.Gravijah said:I think you're stuck with that one! :lol Weren't you the first person to get that or am I crazy...
charlequin said:Nope. Sins against Wii Homebrew are punished by a greater god than I.
This was the best I could manage. Others might be able to do better by reducing image quality rather than dropping frames like I did...John Harker said:I suppose my dancing Turk avatar got the axe
My bad. It was an (awesome) gift. I've had it a year.
Is it fixable?
![]()
Yeah, pretty much. It was asking a question that was very obviously answered in the Wiki when the thread title included "Check the Wiki first or suffer dire consequences."Sklorenz said:Why are people getting those anyway? Is that the penalty for asking a question not covered in the wiki or something, as the av/tag seem to plainly state? Seems rough :lol
No need to resize it. It's a valid avatar even at that size.Repairman_Jack7 said:Can someone help me resize this so I have an avatar. I hate being avatarless and don't want to get banhammered.
![]()
You won't get banned for not having an avatar (as far as I know). But here you go.Repairman_Jack7 said:Can someone help me resize this so I have an avatar. I hate being avatarless and don't want to get banhammered.
I think he was worried about getting banned for using a bad avatar (which wouldn't happen either, unless it was NSFW, but makes more sense).Koroshi said:You won't get banned for not having an avatar (as far as I know). But here you go.
![]()
charlequin said:People have much more boobular avatars than that, so that wouldn't be a problem.
By the way, thank you for showing initiative and double-checking your avatar choice before getting a penalty avatar, Repairman_Jack7. :lol