I don't think he's even addressed it yet and it's barely a blurb on CNN, NPR, local news( just to name a few). I wouldn't call wasting time and money to "prove" something that has very little evidence supporting it amazing. I am so not a Hillary (or Trump) supporter, but I respect her for conceding when she knew it was over and not wasting anyone's time crying for a recount. Stein is coming off like an even bigger loon than she did to start with
Well they apparently did this in 04 without anyone on the ballot, but that didn't lead to anything. I'm a bit weary of some of the numbers coming in on this fundraiser though. It looks pretty consistent at $3k every 4-5 minutes or so.
So...Michigan has certified their results and will do an audit in 90 days to flush out illegal votes, if my information is correct. The more I hear about how Michigan does things, the more I want their policies adopted nationwide. It seems very thorough.
In PA, she'll have to successfully challenge (i.e. prove that her vote totals were hurt) each precinct individually to get recounts. But I don't see how you can do that in a lot of precincts since they don't have paper trails. It seems fruitless and extremely suspicious at the same time. Only challenging in Democrat-heavy districts would be the best way to go about potentially changing results, BUT it would arouse suspicion if they were only done there.
As for Wisconsin...I still don't know about the state. All I know is Trump has a bigger lead there than he does in Michigan, and there are less votes to sift through.