By the way, does Ellison or Perez have a strong stance on what they're going to do about super delegates, if anything?
You'd think that'd be one of the bigger issues facing them for this position.
Seems to be (for Ellison) to let the unity commission figure it out.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/dnc-candidates-superdelegates-232470
I know their was some talk about cutting it down to only elected Reps, Governors and Senators, which eh. I'd rather the whole system just be eliminated not because I particularly care one way or the other, it's just obnoxious when people blame them for their candidate losing and even more obnoxious when they try to pull this eleventh hour "THE SUPERDELEGATES DON'T VOTE UNTIL AUGUST!!!!" silliness.
Because you know, nothing demonstrates principles like spending the entire election season railing against this institution for the hypothetical event that they'll overrule the will of the people, and then demanding they overrule the will of the people when the will of the people isn't you.
One reform I wouldn't mind seeing is the primary process being compressed into like, two months tops. The primary going on as long as it did last year only fed the delusion that Bernie would turn it around when he obviously wasn't. I can't tell you how many times I saw that stupid meme that went "When you're down 400 delegates, and realize California has 537" (whatever the number was) That's right, Bernie will win 80% of the vote in California. Of fucking
course.