That was really distracting in the movie. I liked Colin Ferrell as the villain and then it's just like "oh, he transformed into Johnny Depp" and I was way less interested.I didn't see the first movie but Johnny Depp is Grindelwald? That is either incredibly inspired casting or really off casting.
Good casting but the first movie was worse than The Phantom Menace
Isn't this set during Dumbledore's asshole years?
You know, obsessed with the Hallows and seeking fame
You are entitled to a bad opinion I guess.Good casting but the first movie was worse than The Phantom Menace
You are entitled to a bad opinion I guess.
This seems like an exageration at first glance...but it's true.Good casting but the first movie was worse than The Phantom Menace
Everything about this new series sucks.
Eddie Redmayne is terrible at acting, the Colin Farrell -> Johnny Depp downgrade is stupid, and they seem to have gone even further down the Yates "magic has no rules or anything quantifiable really anymore" route.
Like the bit at the end of the film where they obliviated an entire city was eye rollingly stupid considering tiny infractions made in the original franchise were a huge ordeal to fix.
I also have zero doubt that they are suddenly going to re-retcon dumbledore and make him straight again because lord knows they can't actually have him be gay now that they need to sell cinema tickets.
Good casting but the first movie was worse than The Phantom Menace
You know Rowling wrote the script right? Its not Yates who writes them lolEverything about this new series sucks.
Eddie Redmayne is terrible at acting, the Colin Farrell -> Johnny Depp downgrade is stupid, and they seem to have gone even further down the Yates "magic has no rules or anything quantifiable really anymore" route.
Like the bit at the end of the film where they obliviated an entire city was eye rollingly stupid considering tiny infractions made in the original franchise were a huge ordeal to fix.
I also have zero doubt that they are suddenly going to re-retcon dumbledore and make him straight again because lord knows they can't actually have him be gay now that they need to sell cinema tickets.
JesusGood casting but the first movie was worse than The Phantom Menace
No. TPM is physically unwatchable. Fantastic Beasts is forgettable but fun.
I also have zero doubt that they are suddenly going to re-retcon dumbledore and make him straight again because lord knows they can't actually have him be gay now that they need to sell cinema tickets.
Give it a few years.
As an aside, he would make a great Putin.
I have ZERO complaints on this casting. It's perfect.
Shame about Johnny Depp playing Grindelwald though, it should have been Colin Farrell...
Wow I bought it but never got to reading much of it, is it really that bad? I assumed it had to be better than FBAWTFT.Nah, the fandom hate has a way more deserving target.
We're at a point were the writers flat out said that this was only the "rehearsal script" and that a new script with changes based on feedback will be used for new showings (and sold separately of course...)
Rowling has all the power here. Not gonna happen.
You know Rowling wrote the script right? Its not Yates who writes them lol
Well that's good to hear, at least. But do you guys think they'll have anything explicitly gay in the films? If they're dealing with Grindlewald/Dumbledore in depth they'd probably need to go into it, and I'm worried that they'll just completely gloss over it/not make any reference to it.With Rowling involved? No way.
In an interview she mentioned that she red pencilled a line for movie 6 were Dumbledore remembers dating a beautiful girl in his youth with a big "Guys, Dumbledore is gay!" note
I really hope we get to see Ilvermorny in this one.
I not sure if that is going to happen, as this movie seems to be taking place in London and Paris.
I've seen this opinion thrown around quite often and I don't get it. But then again, I'm also a guy who likes Phantom Menace for the same reasons I like Fantastic Beasts: they build up a very intriguing universe.Good casting but the first movie was worse than The Phantom Menace
lol, I totally forgot about this.Nah, the fandom hate has a way more deserving target.
This IS worse than the TPM
We're at a point were the writers flat out said that this was only the "rehearsal script" and that a new script with changes based on feedback will be used for new showings (and sold separately of course...)
http://www.mugglenet.com/2017/04/paperback-playscript-edition-cursed-child-coming-soon/
I mean it, it really was a terrible movie, to me. I never want to watch it again.
It's not even nostalgia for the other Harry Potter films, I just watched all of those a year ago and thought every one of them was fantastic.
ughh, low key feels like some gaffers get off on being contrariansCan't be any worse than Michael Gambon.
Wow I bought it but never got to reading much of it, is it really that bad? I assumed it had to be better than FBAWTFT.
ughh, low key feels like some gaffers get off on being contrarians
IMO:I've seen this opinion thrown around quite often and I don't get it. But then again, I'm also a guy who likes Phantom Menace for the same reasons I like Fantastic Beasts: they build up a very intriguing universe.
Goblet of Fire is one of my favourites.You think the fourth and sixth HP were better than Fantastical Beasts? Gross.
I'm in for Pope Dumbledore
Farrell was asleep in that movie
I have ZERO complaints on this casting. It's perfect.
Shame about Johnny Depp playing Grindelwald though, it should have been Colin Farrell...