Lava lamp?Zoe said:Then what would you do with them?
Lava lamp?Zoe said:Then what would you do with them?
I live in Cleveland and it's a pretty good day when that's all I get.Angry Fork said:As long as it actually turns into water and doesn't have remnants of the body or whatever I don't really care. I'm not sure how high quality Ohio's public water is though. I'm not sure if one day someone is going to turn on their faucet and an ear lobe, pupil + 3 teeth are going to pop out.
Shick Brithouse said:I have no issues with the bodies being liquified, I just think that flushing the remains down the sewer is a bad idea from many standpoints.
Our society by and large holds a great deal of reverence for how human remains are treated, so when I said that I was speaking as our society as a whole, not my own personal beliefs.
There just has to be a better way to get rid of the leftovers, thats all.
As long as it actually turns into water and doesn't have remnants of the body or whatever I don't really care. I'm not sure how high quality Ohio's public water is though. I'm not sure if one day someone is going to turn on their faucet and an ear lobe, pupil + 3 teeth are going to pop out.
Borgnine said:The human body generates more bio-electricity than a 120-volt battery and over 25,000 BTU's of body heat. Combined with a form of fusion, we might have found all the energy we would ever need. I'm just thinking out loud here.
davepoobond said:i dont know if i feel comfortable knowing i might have a little molecule of Steve floating around in my water down the line.
That would actually be very non-green as your body is probably filled with toxins and chemicals that will cause eco-damage.Gallbaro said:Wait, people actually give a shit about liquified bodies mixing with shit? They find that offensive?
I am going for the greenest disposal, dump my body in the first out desert for something to eat.
Hey You said:What if more and more funeral homes did this? Wouldn't it pollute local waters? Is it dangerous for human contact or even indigestion?
Absolutely none, I agree. But unfortunately that's not how the real world works. Much less controversial things have been scrapped due to public outrage and ignorance.ToxicAdam said:If the person who died and their family want this done, what business does "society" have in stopping it?
DeuceMojo said:You're at least committed to the deep, pretty similar to being covered in soil and having the earth reclaim your form.
Sewer, yeah, not really the same.
Teh Hamburglar said:Its a euphemism for being flushed down the toilet. Didn't you ever have a goldfish?
Alright, look: how else am I supposed to meet my protein requirements for the day?UnblessedSoul said:Thats disgusting and flushing them down the sewers just takes the biscuit, should be banned completely
captive said:i'm laughing at all of you who think this is somehow going to affect your drinking water... You wouldn't drink straight from the tap if you saw the rusty nasty pipes your water travels through to get to your rusty nasty pipes in your house/apartment/townhouse.
I think this will happen. For some reason, I keep thinking that crazy rich people will be liquefied and then made into a Jello mold for immortality purpose. It beats building a statue.Axion22 said:Can I be liquefied and then shot into space?
Alkaline Hydrolysis is a water- based chemical resolving process using strong alkali in water at temperatures of up to 180C (350F) to rapidly yet sympathetically reduce the body to ash. It is essentially a highly accelerated version of natural decomposition chemistry. Hydrolysis as the name suggests is the process of forcing water molecules between the chemical bonds holding large tissue molecules such as fats, DNA and proteins together. This process breaks the tissue down to its original small molecular building blocks. This is a natural process found in body decomposition after death.
With natural body decomposition you eventually after many months or years end up with ash (bones) and a liquid which is exactly what you get with Alkaline Hydrolysis after two to three hours.
Great post, thanks for the additional info.Copernicus said:Since people are too stupid to use the internet:
alkaline hydrolysis
DonMigs85 said:I want my body to be used as fertilizer for a mighty Oak tree.
DonMigs85 said:I want my body to be used as fertilizer for a mighty Oak tree.
Is there a reason you linked to this shitty eight sentence article rather than the actual Columbus Dispatch article it references?ToxicAdam said:
Those answers being:ToxicAdam said:What a silly judge. We allow them to do this to animals but not humans? If a person elects this as a way to be disposed of, why should the law stop them?
FleaTheMagician said:This is disgusting and makes me never want to drink water ever ever again.
I'd also see this movie.BlackNMild2k1 said:This sounds like the base to a horror movie where a convicted killer is liquefied and flushed, only his soul remains attached and his liquified remains are therefore still alive. Now he moves through the pipes murdering people as they use their local water supply to do everyday things like bathe, brush their teeth, make Kool-Aid, go swimming, etc etc.
We can call it Water Works
and then in the sequel, Water Worked, he could have figured out how to actually control another human body since we are mostly water, jumping from body to body by being peed or sweat out. Maybe even swapped around by kissing or other bodily fluid transmissions.
That's gold, Jerry, gold!BlackNMild2k1 said:This sounds like the base to a horror movie where a convicted killer is liquefied and flushed, only his soul remains attached and his liquified remains are therefore still alive. Now he moves through the pipes murdering people as they use their local water supply to do everyday things like bathe, brush their teeth, make Kool-Aid, go swimming, etc etc.
We can call it Water Works
and then in the sequel, Water Worked, he could have figured out how to actually control another human body since we are mostly water, jumping from body to body by being peed or sweat out. Maybe even swapped around by kissing or other bodily fluid transmissions.
UnblessedSoul said:Thats disgusting and flushing them down the sewers just takes the biscuit, should be banned completely
ToxicAdam said:The Department of Agriculture says it's a more environmentally-friendly way to dispose of bodies.
But state health officials say it's not an acceptable way to dispose of bodies.
Ohio administrative code only seems to mention embalming/burial and cremation. I wouldn't be surprised if there were other ways, but I don't see them mentioned.quickwhips said:On a real note does anyone know what the law says proper ways are?
There's nothing a contradictory about the more environmentally-friendly way not being an acceptable method. Regulations like this tend to be written tightly, and anything outside of those regulations is "not acceptable." Get this method written into the regulations, and it will be acceptable.Joates said:Should be bolded in op imo. Its hilarious watching different levels of govt contradict themselves :lol
I can't wait till cannibal restaurants serving voluntary human meals are legalized.ToxicAdam said:I don't understand how this is a "moral" issue? The person dying elects to do this and the funeral home offers it as a service. How is morality being breached here?
There's a very real disease risk there, not to speak of the problems of humans being pressured into it.mrseaves said:I can't wait till cannibal restaurants serving voluntary human meals are legalized.
JGS said:I think this will happen. For some reason, I keep thinking that crazy rich people will be liquefied and then made into a Jello mold for immortality purpose. It beats building a statue.
mrseaves said:I can't wait till cannibal restaurants serving voluntary human meals are legalized.
Squirell Killer said:Those answers being:
1) The process has not been approved by the state department that regulates disposal of human remains, and
2) the law sets forth the ways in which human remains may be disposed.
Columbus sewer officials inspected the funeral home in February. George Zonders, a Columbus Public Utilities Department spokesman, said inspectors decided that the process does not violate city sewage limits for alkalinity and heat and does not need an industrial sewer permit.
House, with the state health department, said Edwards had been checking the word other and writing in alkaline hydrolysis instead of burial or cremation on city burial-permit applications.
"Clearly the state had in mind that there would be other technologies that would be introduced," Edwards said.
Squirrel Killer said:Ohio administrative code only seems to mention embalming/burial and cremation. I wouldn't be surprised if there were other ways, but I don't see them mentioned.
There's nothing a contradictory about the more environmentally-friendly way not being an acceptable method. Regulations like this tend to be written tightly, and anything outside of those regulations is "not acceptable." Get this method written into the regulations, and it will be acceptable.
Except that it didn't answer your questions, while the one I posted did. It's not like posters here need any help in going off half-cocked without any substantive information besides the thread titles. It may be succinct, but it's not very conducive to constructive discussion.ToxicAdam said:I chose that link because it was more succinct. It still got the point across even though it didn't delve so much into the minutiae of it all.
Where does it allow for 'alternative methods?" Because you most recent link includes this:ToxicAdam said:Secondly, the law allows for 'alternative methods' of disposal of bodies. This falls under this jurisdiction and there is no law prohibiting this method. So, the onus should fall upon the lawmakers to BAN this procedure specifically if there is no outward apparent risk to public health.
Those two people seem to argue against the idea that Ohio law allows for 'alternative methods.' I only skimmed the Ohio codes, but I didn't see anything related to 'alternative methods' there either.Columbus Dispatch said:Jennifer Baugess, compliance officer for the funeral directors board, said Edwards was told during a Sept. 13 board meeting that, before hydrolysis could be used, Ohio law would have to be changed to add it as an option in burial permits.
Jennifer House, a health department spokeswoman, said burial and cremation are the only two approved procedures in Ohio.
That's not how "not acceptable" is being used here. If the law says you can only do A or B, then C is not acceptable. There's no value judgment there, it's just that there are two acceptable things, and anything else is not acceptable.Joates said:When you have a state health administration labeling a more environmentally-friendly way of disposing carcasses as "not acceptable", I would consider that contradictory to their MO.
Thats assuming more environmentally-friendly = healthier for the environment = healthier for us.
Squirrel Killer said:That's not how "not acceptable" is being used here. If the law says you can only do A or B, then C is not acceptable. There's no value judgment there, it's just that there are two acceptable things, and anything else is not acceptable.
Squirrel Killer said:Where does it allow for 'alternative methods?" Because you most recent link includes this:
.