bananafactory
Banned
If I've never watched any Jurassic Park movies which ones are the ones I should watch before this? (Or rather which ones are worth watching?)
Just the first one
If I've never watched any Jurassic Park movies which ones are the ones I should watch before this? (Or rather which ones are worth watching?)
The original.If I've never watched any Jurassic Park movies which ones are the ones I should watch before this? (Or rather which ones are worth watching?)
If I've never watched any Jurassic Park movies which ones are the ones I should watch before this? (Or rather which ones are worth watching?)
Yeah that's my prediction as well, mainly 60s though. And I'll see the movie regardless of what score it gets as I'm still a fan of the series despite the sequels(which still had good things about them).I think we can assume it will be between 65-80%. I don't really care but it could be a fun little thing to follow. I don't think people actually care about RT scores more than they just have fun in the sporty element of it.
But I only see 73.It says 74 when you actually click on the movie. If you don't it says 73.
Well even the positive one's are praising shallow things.
On the "smarter" side of the ledger, you can enter three, maybe four large-scale action sequences that do the master proud. Directed by Colin Treverrow in a style that's Spielbergian but not slavishly so, they're bruising and loud but never overbearing, and laid out with admirable clarity. You always know where you are and what's happening, and you rarely see as much blood as you think you do: some of the nastier mayhem is suggested by sound effects, a blur of motion obscured by foreground objects, or a spray of blood on a wall. Every shot and cut pulls its weight. Every new development makes the sequence feel like a story-within-a-story with the end goal of getting the hell away from dinosaurs. The most intense set piece is the final half-hour, a sustained chase through dark woods that reverses expectations again and again, culminating in a whirl of dino-on-dino violence: a funnel cloud of claws and teeth.
The action scenes are imaginative and suspenseful and gradually take on a demented exuberance, with huge-headed dinosaurs sniffing at people and velociraptors attacking in packs. The music of Michael Giacchino repurposes the best of John Williams original score, and although the film ultimately lacks that extra-something that Spielberg often brings the sense that the action is somehow emblematic of something grand in the human spirit the movie has a caustic wit that will do in its place.
Indeed, what ultimately makes Jurassic World so satisfying is that it doesnt buy into the grandeur of the human spirit, not one bit. Instead it shows you a beautifully realized theme park, with holograms and concession stands and rides and attractions, and presents it, not even as a monument to arrogance. Even that would be giving it too much credit. Its just a monument to colossal dumbness.
Tomorrow is the day lads!!!
Going tomorrow night, Friday night, and Saturday morning... and the game comes out Friday too! Best time ever to be a Jurassic Park fan.
If I've never watched any Jurassic Park movies which ones are the ones I should watch before this? (Or rather which ones are worth watching?)
But I only see 73.
Honestly, I get what you're saying. I've never been fond of the "leave your brains at the door" mentality. Any movie CAN be smart and entertaining. Mad Max, I'm sure, has jaded me as it has you.
Honestly, I get what you're saying. I've never been fond of the "leave your brains at the door" mentality. Any movie CAN be smart and entertaining. Mad Max, I'm sure, has jaded me as it has you.
I guess RT hasn't updated on my end!Look again!
But ultimately Jurassic Park is a shallow film in a lot of respects, albeit an excellent one. So I think you have to approach its sequels on their own terms as well.
I'm taking my 5 year old no matter what. I was watching Friday the 13th at his age...For those that have seen it, good for a 4 year old going on 5 who has seen the original?
For those that have seen it, good for a 4 year old going on 5 who has seen the original?
I haven't seen it, but I did hear the body count is higher than any other JP movie, FWIW.
TLW had a high body count.Well, 20,000 people in the park. It was only ever a handful before.
The thing about this film that got me excited was finally getting to see Hammond's vision finally realized. I think that's the new ground that the other films haven't covered.The problem with the sequels is that everything excited about the premise of these films are already covered in the original movie on so many levels and are done so magnificently.
In 1993, there was no other movie before JP that brought Dinosaurs to life the way Jurassic Park did. When the movie starts, it takes its time to introduce the dinosaurs to you and they do it softly incorporating beautiful wide pans and a brilliant soundtrack by Williams to move you. The vegans and stoner dinosaurs are first introduced to kinda ease you in and let you grasp the wonder of these once majestic creatures. You have a sense of discovery and you're given an appreciation for their beauty as you revisit what they were like.
The tables turn when things go wrong for the human characters and now we are thrust into the reality of their predators' nature. The movie uses this as a fun juxtaposition to remind us why it would be hard for humans and dinosaurs to coexist.
And, well, there it is. You are given both ends of the stick with characters who only serve as a window into that world. Their sense of awe and fear are ours and that's all they needed to be. I did not need to understand their worldviews, feelings, politics...whatever. When you have a T-Rex trying to nibble your butt, it doesn't matter.
With that said, I think these are the only elements that lend itself to an exciting story on this subject and clearly, the last few sequels were a rehash. I don't think any movie, including this one, are going to uncover new ground or give the same sense of discovery JP did back in '93. The characters don't need depth. At this point, the only thing these unnecessary sequels can do is just try to be fun.
TLW had a high body count.
The thing about this film that got me excited was finally getting to see Hammond's vision finally realized. I think that's the new ground that the other films haven't covered.
Now post-JW...
You know what kinda disappointed me? The deaths in the movie. Now, it may sound shallow at first, but bear with me for a while: a lot of the deaths in JP fucking scarred me. Gennaro, Nedry, Muldoon - they were not exactly gruesome, but they had quite an impact. They felt scary and filled with dread.
.
Now post-JW...
I think the majority of the poachers were killed by raptors and there were over 20 of them!!!Well yeah, there was the group of poachers that made up the bulk of the deaths. Still wasn't too many, considering. The t-rex in San Diego only killed like, 1 guy and 1 dog.
As kid, seeing a guy getting eaten off the toilet was hilarious! It was the talk of the schoolyard because haha toilet.
Thanks!
LOL, yeah, well - maybe not Gennaro. I had such a strange, dissonant reaction to that death - I laughed at the fact that it happened on a toilet, but it still horrified me
JP3 is so odd that it sort of doesn't even count as part of the franchise, more like a spin-off film. To clarify: JP3 is a Joe Johnston film. That should tell you everything.
Exactly. JP never felt THAT interested in the questions it asked via Malcolm, Grant/Ellie, and Hammond. It's always been a shallow experience--a supremely crafted one, but still shallow.
I don't think Jurassic World is posturing as a scientific/intellectual experience. It will probably pay as much lip service as JP did and then get to what everyone came for: the dinosaurs. As the sequels showed us, simply having dinosaurs in the movie don't make it good, so I'm mostly looking forward to what Trevorrow brought to the table there.
It really does kinda feel like "Jurassic Park Chronicles: Alan Grant" or something like that.
I don't expect JW to come anywhere near JP impact-wise, but it's sounding like a good time and captures some of the magic of dinosaurs after over a decade. JW seems to have a tone of its own, and will effectively replace the previous two sequels as the first sequel that wasn't half-assed.
I havent seen the movie yet, but compared to what I've seen in trailers and clips, the big difference is tension. Those deaths in JP? Each one had build-up to them, were character-driven, and had a big "exclamation point" moment to highlight the death.You know what kinda disappointed me? The deaths in the movie. Now, it may sound shallow at first, but bear with me for a while: a lot of the deaths in JP fucking scarred me. Gennaro, Nedry, Muldoon - they were not exactly gruesome, but they had quite an impact. They felt scary and filled with dread.
Hell, you could say the same about some of the deaths in TLW - Eddie Carr, Peter Stormare and the compys. The characters might not have been all that, but the deaths were chilling.
I don't think any death in JW reaches that level, to be honest.
EDIT: except maybe one.
A big part of the first film was talking about ethics in science, responsibility of power, and respecting nature, but all they amounted to were interesting ideas in the air that would enhance and give flavor to the experience of witnessing living dinosaurs and the dangers that come when everything goes to shit. The characters lacked virtually any depth and were basically vehicles that would recite different perspectives on what the effect of bringing dinosaurs back would mean. They're not flawed, they hardly talk like real people, and are in service of the spectacle of dinos. The lawyer who can't stop talking about money, impossibly optimistic old man with a vision, snarky chaotician, fat unhappy backstabbing weasel, etc.
I havent seen the movie yet, but compared to what I've seen in trailers and clips, the big difference is tension. Those deaths in JP? Each one had build-up to them, were character-driven, and had a big "exclamation point" moment to highlight the death.
Gennaro seeing the vibrations, realizing what was happening, fleeing and leaving the kids, hiding in the toilet, ending with the t-rex chomping down
Nedry being a weasel, his clumsiness leading to his death, the stalking of the dilophosaurus, ending with the reveal of the dino in the car
Muldoon being the skilled hunter and cautious expert, the cat-and-mouse with the raptor, "clever girl", ending with the raptor pouncing
While in JW, you got a lot of people, squads of soldiers, more dinosaurs. More dino chaos rather than build up to individual deaths
Seems to be turning out as a good year for overall movie quality thus far.
The dinosaurs in JP being relegated to the background worked really well and was very thematic in and of itself. They symbolized the danger and consequences of science gone wrong, so to speak. In the last two movies, they were relegated to just "monsters".
1/2. Utterly predictable. Had everything figured out within the first 5 minutes. Bored out of my mind for 2 hours
To those old enough, what was it like seeing JP in theaters? I was born in '92 so I never saw the movie till years later, actually I had seen The Lost World first. Seeing the animatronics and CGI for the first time must have been jaw-dropping
Oh, how are the animatronics in JW? How often are they used?
To those old enough, what was it like seeing JP in theaters? I was born in '92 so I never saw the movie till years later, actually I had seen The Lost World first. Seeing the animatronics and CGI for the first time must have been jaw-dropping
To those old enough, what was it like seeing JP in theaters? I was born in '92 so I never saw the movie till years later, actually I had seen The Lost World first. Seeing the animatronics and CGI for the first time must have been jaw-dropping