Wu beingseemed weird. Wu in the first film didn't seem the typemad scientist
Not sure. How were the flyover shots of main street in 2D? They looked like models and diminished the scope which clashed with the theme in 3D IMO. I'm going to see it 2D next.Alright - going for my second screening, this time in 3D.
How is the 3D?
I rarely see 3D movies but saw this in non-IMAX 3D because of the time slot.Alright - going for my second screening, this time in 3D.
How is the 3D?
Not sure. How were the flyover shots of main street in 2D? They looked like models and diminished the scope which clashed with the theme in 3D IMO. I'm going to see it 2D next.
YES!
As for product placement? Some people had me worried it was in your face bad. Mercedes was the only thing that felt forced. Fuck, guys.
Did you see the multiple shots of the angsty teen putting on his headphones and then looking out the window so you could see the Beats by Dr. Dre logo?
Shit guys, I never once noticed product placement in the movie, and if I did I inmediately forgot about it. I dunno, seems like a lot of you are making a big deal out of... nothing particularly big?
He turns his head so you can see the logo. TWICE.The fact that their cars are Mercedes didn't bother me, but the forced camera angles. They get those "car shots" in. Every time a car stops, it's at an angle that a car would be in an ad. This happened several times, and then the camera panned out to get to the people getting out. Honestly, this was the only thing that bugged me, really.
Kids wear headphones that have logos on them. Beats are a thing that kids wear. Would you rather have generics?
Shit guys, I never once noticed product placement in the movie, and if I did I inmediately forgot about it. I dunno, seems like a lot of you are making a big deal out of... nothing particularly big?
Didn't notice.He turns his head so you can see the logo. TWICE.
The Samsung sponsor label showed up almost immediately after the lady was trying to find a new big park sponsor, so it basically fit in, in my opinion.
Virtually no positive presence of women in any way.
That ending, though. What a turd.I don't get it.Like, this is not Godzilla. We don't give a shit about the T-Rex. Why did he just dip and why did he get like a victory pose?
Uhh, that's untrue for a very big portion of the fanbase.
That ending, though. What a turd.I don't get it.Like, this is not Godzilla.. Why did he just dip and why did he get like a victory pose?We don't give a shit about the T-Rex
Uhh, that's untrue for a very big portion of the fanbase.
Other than not giving a shit about the T-Rex, I agree with this.Saw it. Thoroughly unimpressed. All of the action was super reserved (the only time someone gets eaten and it isn't whole, it happens off screen with the damn cliche wall blood splatter). A lot of the CG blended surprisingly poorly. Virtually no positive presence of women in any way. I also have a super high tolerance for stupidity in movies but it was so constant here. Every time the protagonists ran away in the last act, it was in a ridiculous direction. Or they'd sit and watch theinstead of running away. They wouldn't even get like a safe distance away. They'd stand right beside the action until the thing they were watching through gets destroyed and then they'd bee line to the next object to partially hide behind. The only truly thrilling moment was when theT-Rex fightand even that was over in an instant. Then they made the shoe joke, and there was no visual cue. No shot of her shoes. So weirdly edited.secretary got dropped into the pool
The few comedy beats however worked very well, and the control center duo were both perfect. I'm a fan of both actors so that was a pleasant surprise.
That ending, though. What a turd.I don't get it.Like, this is not Godzilla. We don't give a shit about the T-Rex. Why did he just dip and why did he get like a victory pose?
Colin and Bryce discussed this and came away feeling that not all feminism is girls acting tough and being "one of the guys". Softer sides are okay too.As much as I hate to side with Joss Whedon on... anything (especially a dumb, premature judgment based on 2:30 of footage), Jurassic World does leave quite the sexist aftertaste in your mouth.
Perhaps the laziest jurassic sequel possible. Decent popcorn flick, but utterly lacking the thematic resonance of the first movie. Also, I'm all for campy fun in my movies, but for fucks sake every punchline in the movie was underlined and bolded. And Bryce Dallas Howard comes off as an offensively irredeemable buffoon, existing solely to bounce around Pratt and find more and more convoluted ways to reach increasing states of undress. Pratt too mostly phones it in for the last half of the movie. In fact I'd do a longer proper rant but I'm on mobile right now.
We're in an age of complainersWho cares? And no, didn't even notice the brand. I heard people complain about the coke bottle too. It was hardly fucking there.
Fucking Reese's Pieces in E.T.
My go to remark is imagine our parents were like this. It's embarrassing behavior.We're in an age of complainers
I saw it tonight. Thought it was good. Definitely worth your time to watch it. Once that theme song drops and you see the park it was like my childhood was coming back to me.
Unfortunately, there were scenes cut like the one where they smear shit on themselves.Also, when theand we see the female lead, her hair has gone from perfectly straight to perfectly curled. They weren't afraid of making it look natural later in the movie so I don't get what the continuity person was going for there. She ran through the jungle sweating bullets and tada, that perfect loose beach curl.aviary gets breached
The increasing states of undress is a popular trope in visualizing character arcs. It's not meant to be sexy here.
Colin and Bryce discussed this and came away feeling that not all feminism is girls acting tough and being "one of the guys". Softer sides are okay too.
But her keeping her heels on while shit goes down is a powerful stance for her character to take.
I just hate ism labeling of everything. It's getting a bit obnoxious.
'Jurassic World' dominating the box office for $162 million weekend
It's not a sexist filmit would have to actually devote a modicum of thought and care to its characters for that to even be on the tableit's just needlessly tasteless and dumb.
The last thing I can think of that stood out were how laughably bad some of the extras were. Again when the, you see one of the extras holding on to a couple martini glasses. 'Hah!', I thought, until you see like 9 other extras doing the same thing in the next shot. Cue a bunch just sort of shuffling away and not running. It hurt my immersion in what I found to be the best scene of the movie. At first, it seemed like a statement-- these people clearly don't realize the severity of the situation they're in. Then the destruction starts and people are still running with their drinks in hand.aviary is breached
Like, uh... I think maybe those extras just don't want to spill their drinks. :/
Seems like you have too much of a sharp eye for your own good in movies.
I'm sorry, did she actually have a character arc? As far as I could tell she was just a super uptight ditz for Pratt to weakly play off of. She had no development, she was as cardboard cutout as film damsels get.
She's every dumb (and negative, tbh) career woman stereotype rolled into one utterly useless character. It's not only that she's a total idiot for 90% of the movie, who's uselessness is accentuated by standing right next to hyper-masculine, awesome badass Chris Pratt, but then her uselessness actively forces Chris Pratt to be even more awesome.
And, as I said in the spoiler thread, it was that relationship and, especially, the film's one gratuitous kill shot, which was so sadistic and wildly out of place, that left a bad taste in my mouth. Not even the many varying baddies in the film got a death so intricately and gleefully mapped out. That was bizarre.
It's not a sexist filmit would have to actually devote a modicum of thought and care to its characters for that to even be on the tableit's just needlessly tasteless and dumb.
What I don't get is why can't they just be characters? Why is it always "black, female, gay" etc that get scrutinized for playing clichéd roles?
She's a business person. She also obviously has a knack for feminine flair (fuck, I don't even know if I can get in trouble for such a label these days...) with her stylistic choices and as the movie progresses she becomes more family oriented and more of a doer than a teller. All of this is symbokized by her apparel throughout the film. No, it isn't as deep as Lawrence of Arabia, but neither were any character in any JP film aside from Hammond... if that.
What I don't get is why can't they just be characters?