Mr_Antimatter
Member
Even more painful to read how Gawker justified their position:
I don't know how ANYONE can logically say that a public figure should have his privacy invaded because his sexual escapades are public because he's a public figure. Retarded circular reasoning.
What really hurts is they took the exact opposite stance for the fappening. People called them out for that back when, and gawker tried to brush off the criticism.