FallingEdge
Member
Kobe gonna get his 6th ring!
You really sure about that? Does that even defend its usage at all? It doesn't.Qwomo said:Faggot is contextual in ways that the n-word is not.
Make it. Please.Meus Renaissance said:We need to have a thread discussing why the word 'N' word remains to be used in black society simultaneously whilst making it unspeakable heresy, that by default equates you to a racist, for the white community and why, in addition, the term 'white' can be used in a derogative context by said group. I would stay up all morning reading that thread live
Mercury Fred said:Well I'm not into the whole watersports thing, but to each their own.
By the way, I made my case more than once in this thread. I'm sorry that the fact that I won't demure to the use of a homophobic slur and its defense makes you uncomfortable.
Harpoons are just pieces of metal! Acid is just liquid!afternoon delight said:Um, words are just words? Sticks and stones and what not?
I just want to say, that reading this thread the GAF Gold way (imagining all of your avatars are saying your responses) is the best entertainment I've had all week.
Cubsfan23 said:which even furthers my point as the word having extra meanings to it.
No, if you both messed around it would be statutory rape, because there is no way you aren't prepubescent. It finally makes sense why this issue is of such interest you--you were laughed off the courts at the playground and want to change playground law, the most nefarious law of all. I wish you luck, hike up those knee highs and keep your chin up, son.Mercury Fred said:So I guess if we messed around then it would be a pity fuck?
Cerebral Assassin said:I can't tell if you are agreeing with me or not?
Qwomo said:Faggot is contextual in ways that the n-word is not.
Crumpet Trumpet said:Let's be honest, how many Americans use faggot in a way that isn't meant to be insulting to gay people?
Y'all can say that the meaning of the word has changed to motherfucker, prick, whatever. It's origins are still pretty damn bigoted.
And good for Kobe for explaining himself.spurs 2011 nba champions
I have seen exactly zero arguments in favor of letting the use of f***t slide that hold up and zero arguments that explain why f****t is OK but n****r isn't that hold up.ChocolateCupcakes said:You may have made an argument but you've done a piss poor job at defending it.
BamYouHaveAids said:No, if you both messed around it would be statutory rape, because there is no way you aren't prepubescent. It finally makes sense why this issue is of such interest you--you were laughed off the courts at the playground and want to change playground law, the most nefarious law of all. I wish you luck, hike up those knee highs and keep your chin up, son.
btw, Propositioning everyone you respond to for a sexual encounter doesn't make you intelligent or funny--it makes you a walking gay stereotype, you hate monger. I'm almost convinced you are a homophobe trolling.
Riposte said:How is shunning people for their controversial opinions not hurtful as well? Shouldn't people who shun people also be shunned? I mean that's where this got started in the first place. Sure it is easier to hate the guy who thinks gays should be murdered, but how about the father who wants his son to be physically fit/into sports or produce grandchildren? (This applies to virginal nerds just as much as feminine gays.)
Masked Man said:No, "faggot" and its derivatives are not allotted some special "privilege." Both words are offensive in all contexts. I don't understand why people are trying to justify Kobe's word choice like this. I get why he said it--but that doesn't make it okay.
Korey said:Here's an idea: how about don't use either of those words, in any situation or context?
Masked Man said:No, "faggot" and its derivatives are not allotted some special "privilege." Both words are offensive in all contexts. I don't understand why people are trying to justify Kobe's word choice like this. I get why he said it--but that doesn't make it okay.
Korey said:Here's an idea: how about don't use either of those words, in any situation or context?
Masked Man said:No, "faggot" and its derivatives are not allotted some special "privilege." Both words are offensive in all contexts. I don't understand why people are trying to justify Kobe's word choice like this. I get why he said it--but that doesn't make it okay.
Come on. People know that when they say the word faggot, the word is offensive to gays. The context of the situation is important, and the perp may not mean to be homophobic at all, they may just mean asshole or motherfucker. But I find it hard to believe that people can't realize that the insult has evolved from a gay-bashing word, especially considering that faggot in the gay-bashing context is still so ubiquitous today.Joates said:So meanings are always tied to their origins? Or just the origins that you want to recognize?
You are assuming its a dig on everyone is gay. Its not. Like others have said, unfortunately it is seen as interchangeable with asshole and motherfucker etc. Origins dont really matter at all. Context does.
SUPREME1 said:Cerebral Assassin
Member
(Today, 04:31 PM)
Reply | Quote
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:I've never called anyone a f-- before.
National outrage and multiple statements and shit is ridiculous, but him saying this does come from a culture that supports intolerance toward gays. In my world, you get called an asshole or a motherfucker or something.
Joates said:Look at that faggot over there. (points at bundled sticks)
look at that faggot over there. (points at guy driving the wrong way down a one way street)
Look at that nigger over there... Context: learn it.
Context is actually irrelevant. It doesn't matter what Kobe meant.MIMIC said:His point: Kobe was NOT calling the ref gay
Masked Man said:No, "faggot" and its derivatives are not allotted some special "privilege." Both words are offensive in all contexts. I don't understand why people are trying to justify Kobe's word choice like this. I get why he said it--but that doesn't make it okay.
Off course it's common. That doesn't make it right though. I don't know how you can argue that disliking someone because of eye color, race, sexual orientation, ... is alright.Riposte said:Hmmm, well, why can't you dislike certain intrinsic qualities, even if someone can't change them? It certainly isn't an impossibility, in fact I'd argue it is common to dislike something that people can't change. Moreover is it really any better to dislike someone's character or principles? I mean for them to become agreeable, you'd have to (forcefully) change who they are. In such a case, how is it ever "fair" to make fun of someone's intelligence(as every person arguing for PC has done)? As a child what we learn is completely out of our control and as an adult our education is based on what we have already learned(most adults show unwillingness to learn what opposes what they already know, that is how they tick).
Crumpet Trumpet said:Come on. People know that when they say the word faggot, the word is offensive to gays. The context of the situation is important, and the perp may not mean to be homophobic at all, they may just mean asshole or motherfucker. But I find it hard to believe that people can't realize that the insult has evolved from a gay-bashing word, especially considering that faggot in the gay-bashing context is still so ubiquitous today.
A gay comedian used both words in a show, he didn't seem offended.Crumpet Trumpet said:Come on. People know that when they say the word faggot, the word is offensive to gays. The context of the situation is important, and the perp may not mean to be homophobic at all, they may just mean asshole or motherfucker. But I find it hard to believe that people can't realize that the insult has evolved from a gay-bashing word, especially considering that faggot in the gay-bashing context is still so ubiquitous today.
Probably the vast majority.Crumpet Trumpet said:Let's be honest, how many Americans use faggot in a way that isn't meant to be insulting to gay people?
Srsly said:Does making an offensive word taboo make it more potent when it is actually used?
Crumpet Trumpet said:that when they say the word faggot, the word is offensive to gays.
Gaborn said:But I don't think anyone can reasonably make the case that Kobe meant it that way.
I think that this is a matter of decorum. Professional athletes have to realize that they're in the public spotlight, they're paid to represent their team to the best of their abilities and that's both on and off the court. There is no reason whatsoever to endorse language that is blatantly offensive and more importantly will alienate a significant number of fans.
Joates said:GAFFER: He is doing this to offend the gay community!
spindashing said:My two cents:
Kobe said that he said it in the heat of the moment, and while I understand that: I myself would never use that word in that situation. I used to say faggot when I was younger, but thankfully I grew out of it. You don't just say random shit in the heat of the moment; I'm sure this isn't the first time he used that word.
He apologized, he was fined significantly, it's over.
There's no need to compare and contrast the words faggot and nigger. I'm surprised this thread is going so far.
MIMIC said:His point: Kobe was NOT calling the ref gay
Korey said:Context is actually irrelevant. It doesn't matter what Kobe meant.
I've heard the "Jew" slur thrown around, and never is it used to literally call the subject a person of Jewish descent. It's derogatory and unacceptable when used pejoratively.
I can't believe people still don't get this. Or maybe they don't want to.
Cubsfan23 said:If the referee isn't gay, than it is different. Use some common sense.
Margalis said:"Fag" and similar terms are generally used to emasculate, and yes, that's what Kobe was probably doing. Usually calling someone a fag means you think they are like a gay man in that they are not "real men", girly, etc. To use "fag" in that manner you basically have to believe that gay men are inferior "normal" men.
The use of the word "fag" typically means that the subject is like a gay man, not that you think they are actually gay. Just like calling someone a pussy means they are womanly, like someone who has a vagina, not that they are actually a giant vagina.
Whether or not Kobe thinks the ref is actually gay is totally irrelevant.
MIMIC said:Way to miss the point.
.....which was is that things that didn't mean shit maybe 20 or 30 years ago are used frequently today.
Like I said: Language has evolved. Love it or hate it; it is what it is.
Desi said:black people don't say nigger, we say nigga. Well that is incorrect because old black people may call someone a nigger.
Zoramon089 said:ITT: No one has ever used a gay slur or said "That's gay" in as a joke or in frustration.
Hypocrites...He apologized. He's never shown himself to be homophobic before so why are people making such a big deal out of this
Margalis said:This has been explained multiple times. You are completely missing the point.
Nobody believes that someone you call a "pussy" is a giant walking, talking vagina either.
Masked Man said:It's a little unsettling to see people defend usage of "fag" or "faggot" with such vehemence. Just because a word is commonly used in a derogatory sense doesn't mean that it is somehow stripped of its offensiveness because of the fact that it is used so frequently.
I dunno, are people here really trying to claim that he is trying to offend the gay community? If he wants to offend the ref, that's fine. Gays have the right to be offended as well, considering that it's still a very powerful word and we don't know if he actually meant "you motherfucker" or "you gay man". If he used it in the second way, it makes sense that people would be offended- he's implying that gay men are inherently inferior to "normal" people.Joates said:People should know that it offends gays. That though, doesnt matter at all. You are allowed to offend people.
I find it hard to believe that people are trying to twist his words to being hateful towards the gay community when there is no evidence to back it up. Like you said it evolved. It doesnt simply mean what it once did. And that means you have to actually use brainpower to deduce what he meant.
Sane person: Hes pissed off about the call and wanted the ref to know.
GAFFER: He is doing this to offend the gay community!
WretchedTruman said:I don't think anyone in this thread here truly believes that this indicates Bryant's distaste for the homosexual community. I mean, who here believes that, based on the evidence?
That said, understanding that his impulsive response to what he considered a bullshit call was karate chopping his teammate's hand out of the way and calling the ref a "fucking faggot" isn't a far stretch away from how I discern between people I want to associate myself with in everyday life, and people I don't.
Context means fuck all. He's not homophobic, he doesn't deserve a suspension, and one shouldn't take more from it than what you gather at first glance, but he deserves to be called a jackass, because these are the kind of reactions a jackass has to something he disagrees with. I mean, seriously, how old are you?
Kinitari said:People in this thread are saying that by using the word faggot in a different context, it shouldn't offend homosexuals - or some such nonsense. Nigger is a word that has a lot of impact to a lot of people in this thread, so it's good use as an example.
Here let me cover all my bases.
From now on when someone is slow to reply because he has his head in the clouds thinking about silly things, I'm going to say he's being a kike.
When someone is being stupid, or rather, intellectually dishonest, he's being a nigger.
When someone is worrying too much about the future and not living enough in the present, he's being a chink.
VelvetMouth said:If a player got angry if somebody stole a ball off him in a game and he yelled out, 'you're such a n*gger' to the guy who took the ball off him, would it be the same as calling the ref a f*ggot?