There is no question they have committed a slew of felonies, but where have they assaulted/threatened to assault any individual, withholding conversations in the context of having a potential clash with the government? I have heard a whole bunch of racist and crazy talk come from them, but not many explicit threats of violence, though I always could be ill informed.There's a huuuuuge difference between civil disobedience and armed assault / threat. For one, everyone in occupy knew very well that arrest was a consequence of civil disobedience, and did not take it out on LEOs. You know, exactly what makes civil disobediant protest non-violent.
These loony toons were threatning government workers, threatning to kill LEOs, and keeping people off public land by show of deadly force (weapons).
There's zero relation between the two. None.
While Occupy was intended to be non-violent, to say that there weren't any assaults or felonies committed by their members is simply false.
There have been accounts of rape, theft, vandalism, threats, robbery & assaults. Also, how could you forget Oakland. You can't sit here and tell me what occupy turned into has no similarities to the terrorists up in Oregon.