• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Leader of Oregon occupation Ammon Bundy, at least 8 others arrested

Status
Not open for further replies.

WedgeX

Banned
According to the FBI press release(which another poster linked to above), both flashbangs and nonlethal rounds were used to subdue those in the car. Also, the FBI had been told that Finnicum was armed, and there was indeed a loaded gun in the pocket he reached for.

The death is unfortunate, to be sure. However, the insistence that Finnicum was lying on the ground surrendering told by Bundy and others has been proven to be a complete fabrication.

Edit: quote from the FBI press release:

Thanks.

Did...he actually run over an FBI agent?

And turns out Bundy was full of shit after all? I'm shocked.

I think the person in the road block gets swept up by a snow wave that the truck creates as it hits the snowbank. He seems to roll away and grab his weapon after.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
The son of Cliven Bundy is full of shit?

I don't think even he is saying the guy was surrendering. He's given statements since his arrest via a Lawyer, and that this guy was executed hasn't been in that.

Seems like the "execution" story originated with guy daughter of the guy who was killed. She says Bundy told her that he was executed.
 

besada

Banned
I don't think even he is saying the guy was surrendering. He's given statements since his arrest via a Lawyer, and that this guy was executed hasn't been in that.

Seems like the "execution" story originated with guy daughter of the guy who was killed. She says Bundy told her that he was executed.
Bundy called his wife and told her Finicum was shot on his knees with his hands up. She told Fiore, who widely publicized it.
 

gabbo

Member
I am assuming the FBI agent was unharmed as there were no reports of Law Enforcement injuries.

It certainly looks like it was a close miss though.

As the chopper turns, you can see the same agent swept up in the snow run out from where he was and back into cover
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
looks pretty clear to me. Also the smoke at 10:20, was someone firing from the car?

The order of events is something like this:
- The car is initially stopped peacefully
- Some sort of exchange between police and those in the car take place, but without audio we can't say what
- The driver makes the choice to flee and gets away
- Some time up the road the police have a roadblock (unclear if this was established before or after the initial stop)
- Guy sees police at roadblock and swerves into snow (potentially striking an officer who is trying to stop them, but looks like this is not a deliberate situation)
- Guy gets out of car with hands up. At least two officers have firearms pointed at him, one from the woods with what looks like a carbine or rifle, one from the street side with what looks like a pistol.
- Both are at fairly close range, less than 10 feet certainly
- Presumably they are saying things at this point, but we don't have audio.
- At some point he takes down his arms and is reaching into his left pocket or the left side of his waistband with his right arm.
- Officers, fearing that he is reaching for a firearm, shoot him. It is unclear if he was reaching for a firearm. It is unclear how many times they shoot him but it looks quite quick. We quickly see the left officer lower his weapon.
- The guy falls to the ground, and both officers withdraw, presumably to figure out if he has been disabled or is still a threat.
- Shortly afterwards, a series of flashbangs or smoke devices are used against the car. I think this is what you are talking about when you say "was someone firing from the car?"
- After a few minutes, they are able to get the remaining occupants of the car out peacefully. At this point, a laser sight is trained on the fallen man, presumably in case he is still a threat.


To me, this looks relatively by the book, absent audio that would provide some extenuating circumstance. In light of the fact that the officers used nonlethal force against the other occupants of the car and the initial stop did not involve lethal force, it certainly does not look like they tried to kill him in cold blood. Likewise, the officers do not fire until he reaches into his jacket/waistband. Now, it may have been a panic move by him, he didn't necessarily intend to harm him, but given the prior statements he made, the likelihood of him being armed, and the nature of the move it seems to me like the shot was justified.

Most of the criticism I'd have of this would be broader parameters of police use of force: why not shoot to disable (I know the arguments made against shooting to disable, I don't find them convincing especially in light of non-US law enforcement experiences), why not use the nonlethal ammunition during the initial exchange, etc. But I don't think that makes this a murder.

It further seems that once the initial stop happened, most of the decisions that lead to the eventual shooting death were made by the victim (i.e. the perp), not law enforcement.

As I said when I previously posted here I don't think death is good, even of bad people. A better situation would have been if the driver had avoided reaching for something, or got on the ground faster, or didn't go off the road, or didn't speed off, or wasn't part of an armed occupation of a wildlife reserve. But given that all of those things happened, this seemed like the least bad outcome, and I think that's something to be thankful for.
 
CHEEZMO™;193611287 said:
And there it is. Pleased by how quickly this was released, though the lack of audio is annoying. Finicum should have kept his hands up. Though it also looks like he didn't actually draw? From what I can see his hands stayed at his side, and it doesn't look like he managed to unholster a weapon so I am curious what was being said. Perhaps his intent was suicide by cop.

But yeah, can't really blame the LEOs given the circumstances here.
 

FelixOrion

Poet Centuriate
When the truck hits the snowbank it looks like he clips a deputy.

Yeah looks like he plowed through an agent.

I like how someone was in the trees. Although that could have turned into a wicked crossfire situation.

Did...he actually run over an FBI agent?

And turns out Bundy was full of shit after all? I'm shocked.

Yeah, that's was attempted murder of a police officer.

As the chopper turns, you can see the same agent swept up in the snow run out from where he was and back into cover

I thought it was a drone

The FBI press release said it was actually a plane

And there it is. Pleased by how quickly this was released, though the lack of audio is annoying. Finicum should have kept his hands up. Though it also looks like he didn't actually draw? From what I can see his hands stayed at his side, and it doesn't look like he managed to unholster a weapon so I am curious what was being said. Perhaps his intent was suicide by cop.

But yeah, can't really blame the LEOs given the circumstances here.

Finicum had said numerous times that he never intend to be arrested and that he would fight. I'd argue putting his hands up like that was a (fucking dumb) ploy to draw officers in so he could do more serious damage. Just speculation though.
 

DY_nasty

NeoGAF's official "was this shooting justified" consultant
Amazing restraint not lighting up that vehicle as it approached the barricade.
 

Xe4

Banned
Well I'm always one to wait for evidence to surface before calling it (although given the circumstances its hardly surprising). That was self defense on the agent for sure. I'd have done the same thing. He fled from the police, almost killed an officer by hitting him with the truck, then reached down to his waistband while he clearly had a holster there. Dumb, dumb idea. I'd still like a dashcam or something with audio, and I'm not happy he died but this was self defense on the part of the agent without a doubt.

Also the FBI knew he was armed and dangerous. This was amazing work done by them. It very well could have ended with everyone in that truck dead, and a few cops as well.

Edit: Upon viewing the press release, it wasn't a holster, but a pocket, and he reached for it twice. I wonder who the unnamed people who weren't arrested were? Children, or maybe informants, probably.
 
Most of the criticism I'd have of this would be broader parameters of police use of force: why not shoot to disable (I know the arguments made against shooting to disable, I don't find them convincing especially in light of non-US law enforcement experiences), why not use the nonlethal ammunition during the initial exchange, etc. But I don't think that makes this a murder.

If the dude is going for a gun you gotta kill him before he gets a chance to get a shot off. If you shoot to disable he could still grab the gun and shoot back even if he's fucked up.

I do agree with you that they should try to shoot to disable but since we're a nation of gun nuts so it's fuckin hard. In this case they knew these guys were armed and theyve been talking about how they werent afraid to use their guns.
 

Jackpot

Banned
How long did we have to wait for videos of black victims being released? And how hard did officials try to suppress them.

Even the way white people die is treated differently.
 

Volimar

Member
^These were feds. Apples and oranges to local law enforcement.





The roadblock was probably set up in advance to prevent cross traffic.
 
I hate these d-bags as much as the next guy, and it does look like he's reaching for something right before he is shot, but even if the shooting was justified it seems kind of fucked up that they just left him laying there in the snow. Couldn't they drag him out and try to administer first aid or something?
 

geomon

Member
I hate these d-bags as much as the next guy, and it does look like he's reaching for something right before he is shot, but even if the shooting was justified it seems kind of fucked up that they just left him laying there in the snow. Couldn't they drag him out and try to administer first aid or something?

They had to make sure the others in the truck weren't going to open fire on them with the automatic weapons that were later found inside of it.
 
I hate these d-bags as much as the next guy, and it does look like he's reaching for something right before he is shot, but even if the shooting was justified it seems kind of fucked up that they just left him laying there in the snow. Couldn't they drag him out and try to administer first aid or something?

They had to handle the situation in the truck first, unfortunately.
 
I hate these d-bags as much as the next guy, and it does look like he's reaching for something right before he is shot, but even if the shooting was justified it seems kind of fucked up that they just left him laying there in the snow. Couldn't they drag him out and try to administer first aid or something?
The vehicle and the remaining occupants of the vehicle had to be secured first.

These men were extremists and precautions had to be taken
 

boiled goose

good with gravy
While one of the "least unjustified shootings", I still think officers shouldnt have shot him so fast.

The burden should be to at least seeing a firearm and perhaps even raising it or attempting to point it.

" i thought he was reaching for a Gun" has resulted in too many unjustified shootings.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
While one of the "least unjustified shootings", I still think officers shouldnt have shot him so fast.

The burden should be to at least seeing a firearm and perhaps even raising it or attempting to point it.

" i thought he was reaching for a Gun" has resulted in too many unjustified shootings.

In other cases I would certainly agree.

In this case though the officers had every reason to believe going in that they were armed and we're willing to die rather than be arrested.
 

Xe4

Banned
While one of the "least unjustified shootings", I still think officers shouldnt have shot him so fast.

The burden should be to at least seeing a firearm and perhaps even raising it or attempting to point it.

" i thought he was reaching for a Gun" has resulted in too many unjustified shootings.

I mean they knew he was armed though. And he almost killed a cop as it was. But I would like to see how the cops acted with audio, like a dashcam or something.
 

andthebeatgoeson

Junior Member
While one of the "least unjustified shootings", I still think officers shouldnt have shot him so fast.

The burden should be to at least seeing a firearm and perhaps even raising it or attempting to point it.

" i thought he was reaching for a Gun" has resulted in too many unjustified shootings.

Usually, it's not 'I thought he was reaching for a gun and he's been saying he wanted to shoot people and die for his cause for a couple of weeks.'

Let's not conflate the two. It does a disservice to others who have been shot for no good reason. I mean, this guy did all the things you would tell your kid not to do. Threaten a police officer, carry a loaded gun, evade police, damn near hit a police officer during that pursuit, go on youtube and state you are willing to die.

The sickness of shooting unarmed people is trying to deceptively paint unarmed citizens as a possible Ammon Bundy or these other terrorists. Arguing against killing unarmed citizens doesn't have a lot of crossover with a known terrorist hijacking federal land, torturing a town for weeks, threatening law enforcement, etc.

I hate these d-bags as much as the next guy, and it does look like he's reaching for something right before he is shot, but even if the shooting was justified it seems kind of fucked up that they just left him laying there in the snow. Couldn't they drag him out and try to administer first aid or something?

They had to make sure the others in the truck weren't going to open fire on them with the automatic weapons that were later found inside of it.
Not only that, they were throwing flash bangs. The round of Counter Strikes was still going.
 
While one of the "least unjustified shootings", I still think officers shouldnt have shot him so fast.

The burden should be to at least seeing a firearm and perhaps even raising it or attempting to point it.

" i thought he was reaching for a Gun" has resulted in too many unjustified shootings.

And waiting until they had the gun in their hands would result in more officers being killed.

He was armed, running from the police, and went to his waist with his hands. That is going to get you shot almost every single time.
 
While one of the "least unjustified shootings", I still think officers shouldnt have shot him so fast.

The burden should be to at least seeing a firearm and perhaps even raising it or attempting to point it.

" i thought he was reaching for a Gun" has resulted in too many unjustified shootings.

The moment you see a gun pointed at you it is already too late to react. Just having a gun doesn't immediately get you shot, but reaching to pull it out or aiming you weapon at something will. If you don't have a weapon in your hand, but you are reaching for it and you are known to be armed, you will not get a chance to take it out.


Its like the shoot to wound argument. All it takes is one officer being killed because he waited for the training to change.
 
And waiting until they had the gun in their hands would result in more officers being killed.

He was armed, running from the police, and went to his waist with his hands. That is going to get you shot almost every single time.
They also allowed him to stay in the "reaching for a gun" pose for multiple seconds before shooting, presumably trying to persuade him to comply.

Compare that to the 0 seconds many unarmed victims of police shootings get when they so much as move their hand in the general direction of their waist. This guy was given so many chances to not get shot and he turned them all down.
 

Kinitari

Black Canada Mafia
he was guilty of attempted murder using a vehicle
No I don't think so, first, guilty implies he was tried. Second, from my position it looks like he was trying to get around the blockade, the officer wasn't visible until the last second. I don't think he was attempting to murder that officer.

When he jumped out though, who knows. I can't be confident from the video, but I can at least believe he was reaching for something on his belt potentially. My only worry is that my first gut instinct was that he was wobbly on that snow bank, and was lowering his hands because he couldn't keep balance with them up - which to an officer who knows he's armed, and probably saw the revolver on his belt, would have looked like he was reaching for the gun. But he could have also been reaching for the gun.
 
when wobbling on a snow bank, you stick your arms out to brace for a fall, you don't lower your hands towards your waist/pockets

he was going for his gun

terrorist he was
 

boiled goose

good with gravy
Usually, it's not 'I thought he was reaching for a gun and he's been saying he wanted to shoot people and die for his cause for a couple of weeks.'

Let's not conflate the two. It does a disservice to others who have been shot for no good reason. I mean, this guy did all the things you would tell your kid not to do. Threaten a police officer, carry a loaded gun, evade police, damn near hit a police officer during that pursuit, go on youtube and state you are willing to die.

The sickness of shooting unarmed people is trying to deceptively paint unarmed citizens as a possible Ammon Bundy or these other terrorists. Arguing against killing unarmed citizens doesn't have a lot of crossover with a known terrorist hijacking federal land, torturing a town for weeks, threatening law enforcement, etc.




Not only that, they were throwing flash bangs. The round of Counter Strikes was still going.

I know and I largely agree. This guy had made comments before regarding not being arrested peacefully.

I know it makes a difference, practically.

I am still worried about having the legal standard be "fear for my life". It is too subjective.

Is there any way we could delineate this shooting and the unarmed ones? (Legal standard)

For what these guys did, they were treated incredibly well since day 1.

Yup definitely. The double standard is so clear it hurts...
Ideally... the police would show such restraint consistently. Id rather they have patience and spend some money than kill people unnecessarily.
 
Unbelievable..

It's okay Gordon. Some people are just now realizing the things minorities have to go through every day.

In a way, we should be thanking these patriots and their militia for showing us that yes, all lives do matter.

If only there was a movement to show people that police violence should be scrutinized whenever it is utilized, even in routine situations.

Wouldn't that help make the world a better place? I mean, once they're done blocking public areas instead of working or peacefully protesting.

It's up to you to decide whether I'm talking about the Bundies or BLM on that last one.

/S
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom