2 game throwers on 1 team. God damnit!
Riven's one of my two absolute favorite champions, and Riven/Fizz/Ziggs/Teemo are some of the very few champions where I occasionally feel like I'm actually having FUN with the mechanics and not merely punishing myself or something by playing...so count me interested if what you say is true.http://na.leagueoflegends.com/news/fiora-grand-duelist-revealed
She seems pretty dull, and has some of Riven's qualities....
Not interested.
Riven's one of my two absolute favorite champions, and Riven/Fizz/Ziggs/Teemo are some of the very few champions where I occasionally feel like I'm actually having FUN with the mechanics and not merely punishing myself or something by playing...so count me interested if what you say is true.
I don't mean to sound like a jerk, but we know at least three Riot people read this thread -- what champion mechanics would you want to see, that you would not consider creatively bankrupt?It's more along the lines of being disappointed with their creative bankruptcy at this point.
I agree though, sounds also like Xin and Yi.
It isn't a magic reflecting ability. It blocks a basic auto-attack and returns magic damage. Not all that different from Jax.I don't mean to sound like a jerk, but we know at least three Riot people read this thread -- what champion mechanics would you want to see, that you would not consider creatively bankrupt?
I don't know anyone in the game with a magic-reflecting ability, so I'm looking forward to seeing if it's useful. Just looking over the abilities, it sounds like what's going to happen is that Fiora's super movespeed will be useless as soon as someone clicks an auto-target CC attack lke Sion's or Taric's or Annie's.
Oh I see, it deals the damage that would have been done back as magic damage...making it even worse than Jax. Oh well. (I don't think Jax needs to be autoattacked at all anymore, by the way, unlike his previous setup.)It isn't a magic reflecting ability. It blocks a basic auto-attack and returns magic damage. Not all that different from Jax.
It's more along the lines of being disappointed with their creative bankruptcy at this point.
I agree though, sounds also like Xin and Yi(ult sounds like a combo of Alpha Strike, and Ken's ult).
Well it will probably do more single target damage than Jax's skill, but it won't have the stun obviously, and Jax no longer requires people attacking him (although it does boost the damage).Oh I see, it deals the damage that would have been done back as magic damage...making it even worse than Jax. Oh well. (I don't think Jax needs to be autoattacked at all anymore, by the way, unlike his previous setup.)
Got my 1st PVP Win earlier. God, I love Ziggs so much. Learning him has been fun as shit, unlike Taric, which I'm quickly wishing I hadn't unlocked him & a skin for him.
Maybe they'll stop at 100.Not sure what I'm getting at, but when there's a new champ every two weeks or so, and we all look at it and say, "Oh, it's just like that other champ." and "That makes everyone who bought the last champ look like an idiot." there surely must be something amiss, right?
Maybe they'll stop at 100.
Why would people want skins for the OP champion of the month? They can just add new champions as long as each one is powerful and nerfed four weeks after release (Ziggs). I think someone pointed out the calculations earlier in this thread, how you'd need to play like crazy for a year or something before you could earn enough IP to unlock all of the 6300 IP champions, including the ones that will be released by that point in time.No, because that's not how they're going to keep an increasingly ADD player base interested in a game design that's 5+ years old. And they need to keep them around to buy skins, because every player that's *really* addicted to this game gets all their champs via IP.
They want an ever increasing pool of champs that the balance can be changed on all the time to 'keep it fresh', and get people to buy skins for the OP champ of the month.
Guys guys guys.
I have an idea.
FEMALE VARIANT SKINS of male champions, for 975 RP each.
That way, Riot can continue to make money, without making their game more imbalanced than it already is.
Why would people want skins for the OP champion of the month? They can just add new champions as long as each one is powerful and nerfed four weeks after release (Ziggs). I think someone pointed out the calculations earlier in this thread, how you'd need to play like crazy for a year or something before you could earn enough IP to unlock all of the 6300 IP champions, including the ones that will be released by that point in time.
All they really have to do besides expensive skins is to constantly add expensive champions, preferably very powerful at release, and possibly charge for some gameplay-affecting things like rune pages. That combination of things should make a fair number of people pay for the game.
Balance changes and new content is appealing. If there wasn't any people would be constantly asking for that stuff.
Nothing is like Riven so all this arguing has its validity questioned.
Riot also has said they're going to slow down once they hit 100 champs
Guys guys guys.
I have an idea.
FEMALE VARIANT SKINS of male champions, for 975 RP each.
That way, Riot can continue to make money, without making their game more imbalanced than it already is.
If they had that, League of Legend will become something like arcana heart, no one will ever play male =p
Finally a reason to post this video again! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJuifu6t8AE
What level are you?Some solo queue team comps I have seen recently:
Nunu/Karma bot
Sona/Singed bot
Morde/Swain double jungle
Derp.
Had my 1st loss earlier today, but man, it was one of those matches that was back & forth and went to the very end. Hated losing, but was just a great match. Evenly matched, everyone played smoothly and didn't have any derp derps on either side.
With that being said.....
My 2nd win of today had the King Derp Derp on my team and had both sides forcing him to leave the game. Even faced with a 4v5 match, we punched out a win, which was great.
Welp, learned the hard way that Karthus counters Kennen.
Probably, but I still wouldn't pick Kennen against Karthus in the future.Just sounds like you got outplayed son.
Infact, maybe Kennen counters Karthus.Probably, but I still wouldn't pick Kennen against Karthus in the future.
I bet Gaf would complain about my amazing champion ideas.
With what kind of play? What's really stopping Karthus from outfarming Kennen and avoiding the harass behind the minion wave?Infact, maybe Kennen counters Karthus.
Pretty much how a lot of games go down at my level of ELO. I still feel like I would rather just pick Veigar or Xerath against Karthus.You should be able to match his CS unless he's pushing you really hard - which is only possible if your jungler is asleep or you're really behind somehow.
You can complain after Riot send me an offer and the champion gets released.Pitch your ideas for usand then we'll complain
Yeah, there are better counters to Karthus than Kennen. But I still think that post 6 is much in Keenan's favour due to the difference between rush vs wall and ult vs ult making up for whatever cs you may have lost under tower.Pretty much how a lot of games go down at my level of ELO. I still feel like I would rather just pick Veigar or Xerath against Karthus.
Farming with kennen is easy even when you're zoned. The range on the Q is crazy.