And if you hit with all that poke, you will do crazy damage. So make it count.
"crazy damage" means 20-40 more damage than Xerath's Q if I'm reading the wiki correctly, and Xerath's hits everything in the line. I'm kinda busy and haven't taken the time yet to compare AP mid Q DPS so I'll concede that maybe you're correct on this. It looks like it should be perhaps 450 damage by the early teen levels depending on magic resist.
Inskipp said:
Where did I say I was fighting them mid? I was referring to skirmish- combat
The vast majority of my analysis was based off of playing Ziggs as AP mid versus other common AP mid champions. I'm sorry if that wasn't clear. =/ I tried to make it clear that I was suggesting the matchups could be unfavorable. You could of course argue he works well in another lane.
Inskipp said:
Again you're going off with the notion that it's hard to land his skills.
How? The section you quoted is in relation to one specific skill, the minefield. What other skills did I mention in that section?
Inskipp said:
Also, you're describing as if his mines are there for raw damage. I personally don't care if I hit with all of his mines, or just two of them. Even one is enough to apply the slow effect, which pretty much guarantees my hits with the following Q- spam. Which again does plenty of damage on its own.
The reason I mentioned the mines for damage is because you said
"His mines can deal 1000+ damage (not exaggerating) to a single target", something both I and EXGN responded to.
Inskipp said:
By not walking into their range? Like Dance said, Ziggs has one of the longest ranges in the game.
I agree that playing poke style could be feasible as long as the enemy champion can't absorb/shield/heal, or push the lane too quickly, or stay out of range themselves. I would need to experiment more with Q specifically.
Inskipp said:
You seem to be rotating these very simple concepts or unfinished thoughts in your descriptions. Unless you can provide me a replay of your gameplay with Ziggs, I am not interested in continuing this discussion.
There's no need to be rude about it. You brought up the misleading ult information (it does less damage in the middle which you did not mention), you were talking about heavy minefield damage (which both I and EXGN responded to) only to followup by saying you didn't care about minefield damage, and you seem to be talking about skirmishing rather than AP mid matchups. I took a good bit of time to look up numbers and run calculations for AP mids, and your response phrasing of "blown to shit" didn't really lend itself to numerical comparisons and arguments.
So I'm getting kind of weird mixed messages about what exactly you're discussing -- AP mid matchup feasibility, or skirmishes, or poking with a lane partner, or what.
If you'd rather not discuss it that's fine. I welcome general playstyle suggestions and numerical comparisons, and I agree with Volimar that I want to see where he ends up once Riot finishes experimenting. My personal theory is that he will be subpar, especially if nerfed, but I'd be happy to be wrong. I think several other people in this thread who have played Ziggs have mentioned that he's either fun or "meh" but ultimately probably not as good as other AP mid options.