Yeah, I know. That's why I said I find it funny because it only shows all those people's hypocrisy, i.e. let's choose what to follow (and force everybody else to follow it too while we at it) and what to ignore, even though all of it comes from a single book that is meant to represent "God's will". I actually had a conversation with a guy that tried to state that all those ridiculous laws in Leviticus 19 were only limited to Jews (while those from Lev. 18 and 20 were not, of course, even though it's all one continuous text).
My logic is that if one thinks that the Bible has legitimacy and finds it so important that he/she has to use it as an argument in a discussion about humans right, then that person should follow the book through and through, without picking and choosing laws and quotes that fit him/her. Otherwise he/she isn't any better than any other sinner and has no rights to dictate what other people should and shouldn't do based on the book. And, as you said, Bible forbids any kind of sex that isn't between wife and husband and that doesn't lead to procreation; anal sex, oral sex and any type of sex with contraceptions is just as sinful as gay sex. So every time that topic comes up I'm gladly reminding the debater of it. The guy I mentioned before was surprised when I told him that the Church forbids condoms. Well, guess who's a sinner too.Trying to use the Bible to undermine the Bible is a dead end in my eyes because it's still suggesting the book itself has some legitimacy.
Well, I agree with that.But ultimately the issue is people are seeking moral advice from a centuries old document that was crafted by men to consolidate power initially for the Roman Emperor and then for the church back in a time before we had any concepts of evolution, universal human rights, morality, democracy and liberty, social justice etc... etc...