Seb McKinnon's art for the promo mtgo Stasis is incredible:
It's hard for anything to beat Fay Jones' original for me on this card but this is an exceptional effort.
If they actually do fairy tale plane this is what it should look like.
Absolutely. This has a serious Brian Froud vibe.
This reads like an essay written by a 1L who got a C- in contracts.
The lawyers shitting on it in the comments are pretty funny. This article is a great example of motivated reasoning in action.
That is spectacular. I hope Wizards continues to embrace artists who aren't churning out the cgi fests we've seen over the last decade.
I think there's actually a scarcity problem to a degree. Seb has six illustrations in AKH block and they're all pretty great. Kev Walker has 4, Volkan Baga has 4. A lot of the artists who've done spectacular work in more classical or stylized styles are too successful in fine art or general illustration to stick around in Magic (Guay, Meignaud) or have moved onto gigs where they don't do individual cards anymore (Jarvis.)
Like, I would like to see the style tilt further in this direction, but I don't think the core issue is that they're unwilling to commission artists who work in more stylized forms.
Wow. Now if you could only get this in paper we would all lose our shit.
Stasis isn't reserved so I figure there's a very good chance this is in either Iconic or 25 Masters.
On the federal level I'm not so sure where the line is, but a large amount of states have laws that would destroy MtG as we know it if they figured out WotC was factory the secondary market into their products. Buying boosters IS gambling, and in many states so is the act of paying money for a card tournament.
Gonna need a citation on this. In the US, gambling is largely legal on the federal level and defined pretty specifically on the state level. To just go with one state law:
(3) CONTEST OF CHANCE . Any contest, game, gaming scheme or gaming device in which the outcome depends in a material degree upon an element of chance, notwithstanding that skill of the contestants may also be a factor therein.
(4) GAMBLING . A person engages in gambling if he stakes or risks something of value upon the outcome of a contest of chance or a future contingent event not under his control or influence, upon an agreement or understanding that he or someone else will receive something of value in the event of a certain outcome. Gambling does not include bona fide business transactions valid under the law of contracts, including but not limited to contracts for the purchase or sale at a future date of securities or commodities, and agreements to compensate for loss caused by the happening of chance, including but not limited to contracts of indemnity or guaranty and life, health or accident insurance.
Purchasing a pack isn't a contest, doesn't involve staking something, and is a bona fide business transaction. Acknowledging that a secondary market exists doesn't change any of this if WotC themselves aren't directly backing the identified value on that market. It just doesn't come close to qualifying.
The case against tournaments is actually much stronger since in some states a "material contribution of chance" makes any paid competition with prizes gambling, though even then it's a pretty small portion of states where it's a serious concern.
I know I'm being kind of pedantic about this, but it's a topic where people broadly reference "gambling laws" all the time to explain certain things, but if something is risky under those there's going to be a concrete reason why.