MaRo's posting on Iphone I believe, he gets a nonzero amount of autocorrect failures."There sending in their army"?
MaRo's posting on Iphone I believe, he gets a nonzero amount of autocorrect failures."There sending in their army"?
Nah. It's not Ravager. It's not just "good 2 drops that use other cards" that make it a cycle.
That runs into the Lorwyn problem of "Where are all the fights?"
So I've learned how I like Magic, and that's playing EDH. So..hooray for that.
Currently, I'm trying to build two more EDH decks. One is a wolf-pack deck, probably using Omnath as a general (since I couldn't find a suitable wolf-themed general).
I've been running really well in MtG lately.
Went 4-0 in drafts earlier this week. First pack was a foil Wingmate Roc and a regular Flooded Strand. I wanted to get up and leave so bad. I pick the foil Roc and let the player left of me know that he's getting a gift. It made me go into Abzan, but it was mainly W/G splash B. I learn to value lands highly and would just about pick it over everything that wasn't a great removal. It was really aggressive and really punished the morph heavy decks. Is Dragon Boon the G3 untap creature and gives 2 +1/+1 counters on a creature? I ran two in there and it was a blowout every time. Totally underestimated that card in the past.
In standards, I've switched up my R/W midrange deck to Mardu Midrange. I went 4-0 twice within the week. I felt like it fought Abzan, Temur, and G/x decks extremely well and that control, RDW, and Jeskai decks gives me the problems instead.
I gotta say the local players gives too many tells. For instance, in one game I was against a BUG control player. I was on the play and on T3, I have a Crackling Doom in hand and his board only had a Sylvan Caratid. I don't know what it was, but he visibly gave off that he was really dependent on that Caratid, so I decided to Cracking Doom and get it off the table. It held him back several turns from playing a 3cmc card and it was too late by then. I tend to target mana dorks extremely high though.
Geez did I love casting Crackling Doom. I had an Abzan player clear the board and cast a Sorin and minus two it to make a vampire. I CD it and redirect the dmg to Sorin to finish it off. That's a 2f1 to me.
And I don't normally play black. Against an opponent, I had 3 Thoughtseize and a Depise opening hand. It felt bad ripping his hands apart immediately but oh so good lol.
Since Omnath isn't super wolf themed, have you considered Tolsimir Wolfblood? He's green and even makes a wolf token. Otherwise I'd look at RG commanders like Radha or Xenagos to get those red and green werewolves (if Werewolves count for your wolf-pack theme ofcourse).
I suppose I could also do wolves & spiders to handle the aerials.
Hurricane those aerials down
I'm mostly just giving him shit per SOP.Mandrills is a completely reasonable card in a deck that's doing something other than the usual midrange thing. It's more of a Temur card, where you need to create a threat while doing something else at the same time.
Speaking of EDH, my roommate's EDH deck is too dominate and usually wins the weekly leagues. I spent over $150 in cards last night to spruce up my Mimeoplasm deck and try to beat his Animar deck. :l
I guess I'd trust you more if you weren't playing Hooting Mandrills.
I think they seem awesome and people will eventually come around. If I were playing Standard I'd absolutely consider a build that maximized their use.
queeractivist asked: Follow up: A planeswalker with morph wouldn't work with the current rules. 209.1. Each planeswalker....enters the battlefield with [a loyalty number] of counters on it; 121.1b A planeswalker with 0 loyalty is put into its owners graveyard as a State Based Action; 702.36d Any abilities relating to the permanent entering the battlefield dont trigger [with morph cost paid]. Ergo, you would morph it and send it to the graveyard.
Maro: FYI
From the Maro tumblr:
This upsets me because it would be easy for design to write on the card:
When you Unmorph Visara the Hidden, put 4 loyalty counters on it
Right?
Even with that line it causes a ton of weird rules stuff to happen that wouldn't be particularly logical. The worst one being "Shock your morph." "Okay, I flip it into a Planeswalker." *Shock fizzles*
Yeah, but Shock doesn't usually interact with lands. It can hit Planeswalkers, it just misses in this situation because rules.
Even with that line it causes a ton of weird rules stuff to happen that wouldn't be particularly logical. The worst one being "Shock your morph." "Okay, I flip it into a Planeswalker." *Shock fizzles*
Actually, Shock cannot hit Planeswalkers. I presume you understand why, but I think that distinction is why its not really a rules problem - its just a misconception that Shock can target a Planeswalker.
Is that any different than morphs that counter or redirect spells? I don't know if I see a problem with it honestly. But they have been shying away from "Gotcha!" morphs.
Unless you are in a very weird meta, I'm not sure why you care what Whip decks are doing. You can always surprise someone with a rogue deck, but I don't think Abzan Reanimator decks are very well positioned against the existing meta at all.
It does for the vast majority of purposes. "Shock your Jace" is a legitimate thing to say. So it'd be weird from a mechanics perspective to point a spell that could damage a thing at the thing, only to have it turn into something else that the spell could still damage, but it misses in this case because you didn't target it at the player. The flavor of morph is that it's still supposed to be the same thing in the same place but now it is revealed, but suddenly your bolt is missing for some reason.
Unless it was Fated Conflagration, in which case you're good.
I think it is different because those morphs are specifically supposed to counter the spell, while a creature -> Planeswalker morph just causes this stuff to happen due to the type changing. I think specifically going from a creature to a PW just causes a lot of weird situations where things will start interacting in ways that don't follow. Like if you block with it, and then unmorph it, it gets out of combat even though we've had PWers that can be in combat. Or if you attack, hit your opponent with it, unmorph it into a tapped Planeswalker and can still use an ability this turn even though it already "did something" this turn. Or if it gets damage marked on it it can unmorph into a PWer, with damage, that hasn't lost counters.
I just don't think that kind of weirdness is worth the novelty of a Planeswalker with morph.
"Shock your Jace" is in fact not a legitimate thing to say. Its acceptable because I know what you're saying (for the record, its a bad habit to Shock a PW directly because you are giving out information to your opponent in advance), but the rules do not allow you to Shock Jace, period. This is why I think the alleged rules issue is moot - the misconception in the rules is that you can Shock Jace when you cannot Shock Jace under any circumstances as a legal play.
It is an officially established shortcut in the tournament rules. It is as legitimate as saying "your turn" during your first main phase to pass priority to the end step.
From the Maro tumblr:
This upsets me because it would be easy for design to write on the card:
When you Unmorph Visara the Hidden, put 4 loyalty counters on it
Right?
I've only been keeping up with coverage and haven't been playing Standard myself, but I get the sense that the metagame is still in flux, and that the only truly consistent performers among all the big tournaments have been Siege Rhino decks. Otherwise, anything can happen.
Edit: Looks like the thing i was replying to was actually part of a different discussion, oops