People that have to look at ass cracks are the victims here.Are we really victim blaming up in here?
Unless you can show the receipts that they don't make pants that fit you, I don't feel bad for you if a dude posts a humorous reddit thread featuring your ass-crack.
Difference is just the outward-facing chairs making it obvious.I'm not convinced there's even a significant difference in ass cracks per capita between a Magic event and the bleachers at a baseball game or other event where people sit down.
But what if you made a humorous thread about girls with their boobs hanging at cons out because you wanted to shame them into covering up, hmmm?
"Victim blaming" as a phrase has rapidly become meaningless. Because, for example, it gets applied to the people who leave their ass cracks hanging out in public. You can't just reduce an argument to "victim blaming" as though that somehow resolves the argument in your favor. Literally every dispute is more nuanced than that.
But what if you made a humorous thread about girls with their boobs hanging at cons out because you wanted to shame them into covering up, hmmm?
Who knows what that person's hygiene situation is? Other people sit in those chairs as well.
An unfortunate shift in a chair resulting in an ass crack? Sure, that happens from time to time to anyone I'm sure. And if it happens, pull em up. But consistently, round after round, asses everywhere to be seen? No, that's just pure ass-covering carelessness.
Wear a belt. Pull up your pants. Be an adult. It's not that hard to make sure you're fully clothed when in public.
It doesn't aptly describe anything that happens here unless you dramatically over-simplify the argument. Its a buzz-word you're using to try and win an argument without actually arguing your point sufficiently.
And yeah, the "humorous thread about girls with their boobs hanging at cons" is neither here nor there. That's just changing the subject to something you can blast a lot easier. Its not the same thing, like at all.
The only way this post makes sense is if you saw the first sentence of my post, saw the word "victim blaming" and decided to stop reading - I already explicitly argued my point. Do I need to repeat myself? Maybe if I organize it in bullet points it might be easier for you to understand?
Why the Crack-gate guy is an asshole and what he did was wrong
"They were gross and thus deserved it so the Crackgate guy was in the right" is moving all the blame for the act from Crackgate dude to those he photographed. The crux of the Pro-Crackgate guy argument is that those people had it coming to them and deserved it. How is that acceptable? How lacking in empathy do you have to be to have that line of thought? Just because there is a problem doesn't mean any and every solution is acceptable.
- It's an invasion of privacy. Even in public spaces, taking pictures of people without their permission (especially of sensitive areas) and plastering them online is not acceptable. You can make exceptions like if an individual is a public danger (escaped convict, suspect for a terrible crime, etc.) but that obviously doesn't apply here. If you come to an event and have to worry somebody might be recording your image against your will (either to shame you or for some other purpose), its natural to feel uneasy or scared. This problem is even worse for women for obvious reasons.
- Bullying doesn't work. There should be enough examples in our own lives or those around us to know that just bullying a person is very unlikely to produce positive change - especially with an issue like wardrobe. If you want to moderate someones behavior, either confront them privately or get an intermediary to do so for you like a store owner or judge.
- It hurts the image and growth of the game. "Large" and/or less fashion sensible individuals are more very likely to leave the community wholesale after such a shaming. People who know nothing about Magic or are still forming their first impressions of the community are going to think everybody is a bunch of gross slobs and stay away. Both hurt the playerbase and in turn hurt the game (its a business afterall).
If you think that assigning those exposed-ass guys the label of "victim" and therefore saying they are immune from criticism, then, well, okay I guess. But its hardly that cut-and-dried. Its not actually socially acceptable to wander around with your ass hanging out. Whether these dudes kept their asses out and whether Crackgate guy was in the wrong are actually separate events. Using the "victim blaming" argument treats them as a singular event, which isn't actually fair since I personally would like these people to keep their asses in their pants.
Let's put it this way: if dressing such that your asscrack is exposed while sitting down is something that deserves to be punished, then an appropriate punishment should be given. If public shame is considered to be an appropriate type of punishment, then the degree of public shame should be appropriate. Having your ass posted online to an audience of thousands for the specific purpose of mocking you is surely a disproportionate punishment.
People who know nothing about Magic or are still forming their first impressions of the community are going to think everybody is a bunch of gross slobs and stay away.
Oh good, we're arguing about the buttcrack guy again.
Can't we just talk about how insane this has gotten?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MTG-Foil-Tarmogoyf-MM2-Stamped-GP-Vegas-Top-8-Pascal-Maynard-/261911963536
Even with giving half the proceeds to charity...
...holy shit.
Can't we just talk about how insane this has gotten?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MTG-Foil-Tarmogoyf-MM2-Stamped-GP-Vegas-Top-8-Pascal-Maynard-/261911963536
Even with giving half the proceeds to charity...
...holy shit.
yeah why is this happening again
Remind me, how much was 1st Place again?
A third of a foil stamped T8 goyf as of 8:31PM EST.
Seriously?A third of a foil stamped T8 goyf as of 8:31PM EST.
...seriously?
C'mon Wizards
So a couple weeks into Magic now. Here are a couple decks built from the random cards I had from a few years ago (mostly from M11 deck builders toolkit). The U/W deck is missing a card from the decklist, but I don't care enough to find out which one lol. Also, that deck was mostly built buy a guy at a comic shop for me back when I bought the toolkit. I've just been playing these casually against my girlfriend and usually win, but I'm very aware that they aren't very good.
https://deckbox.org/sets/996233
https://deckbox.org/sets/993319
Anyway, I've been thinking about buying this budget B/W warriors deck I found online to go get wrecked at my first FNM. Any thoughts?
http://deckstats.net/decks/25054/229989-dtk-b-w-warriors-budget-deck/en
He should thank Owen and Huey for driving up the price thanks to creating controversy.
The five dollar shipping in a USPS flat rate envelope listed on that auction is now hilarious.
The five dollar shipping in a USPS flat rate envelope listed on that auction is now hilarious.
Yeah, that sucker is getting shipped with the highest possible levels of insurance and tracking at this point.
As if he is actually going to ship a Tarmogoyf.
Honestly I just hope these bids are legitimate. There was a crazy jump today where it literally doubled from like 4k to 8k which just seems fishy.
edit - it looks like there are some high feedback bids going on now so thats cool.
I was at that GP and the heat caused by poor ventilation and too many people was a lot worse than the 1% of people showing some butt. Guarantee every chair in that room saw it's share of swampass.
15k! Geez, that is nuts. This isn't quite as one of a kind as 1996 World Champion, but still pretty impressively unique.
I enjoyed the Twitter convo today about what other individual specific cards from famous tournament moments might go for big bucks. The Worlds Bonfire and the Nassif called-shot Cruel Ultimatum both came up, but far and away my favorite suggestion was the Mike Long lap Cadaverous Bloom.
That one particular Lightning Helix would be another.