pelicansurf
Needs a Holiday on Gallifrey
[QUOTE="God's Beard!";170067008]After all this time I just figured out why people call WotC wahtsee.[/QUOTE]
I prefer wotkuh
I prefer wotkuh
I prefer wotkuh
I always get MaRo and Maro confused.
Maro the card was literally named after MaRo.
It's "great with Æther Vial" in the same way any other 2 cost Merfolk is great with Æther Vial.Seems great with aethervial.
Can't counter PWs/Artifacts/Enchantments. It's a big deal in the main.Am I wrong in assuming that casting a Flusterstorm would have the same effect as a Spell Pierce if you're countering the opponent's first spell of the turn (i.e. your Flusterstorm is storm count 2).
Is there any reason 3 Flusterstorm main instead of 3 Spell Pierce?
I do understand storm can be Stifled, but what about even like 2 Spell Pierce and 1 Flusterstorm?
Can't counter PWs/Artifacts/Enchantments. It's a big deal in the main.
I Force it on the spot.Ah yes, I totally overlooked that part. Okay, I'm keeping 3 Spell Pierce main then. I love being able to counter turn 1 top! >=)
I Force it on the spot.
Yeah, that's different- I'm playing Tempo decks which don't want a top player setting up removal.I think at that point I would let it resolve even if I had a force in hand. I like to keep my forces for the Show and Tell counter battle. I'd probably force a counter balance next turn though so I don't potentially get locked out.
Random question: How expensive would this card have to be not to break the game?
Stormify
Instant
Copy target spell for each spell cast before it this turn. You may choose new targets for the copies.
I almost think this isn't printable - if it is it's at a completely stupid 6=7cc+ mana cost.Random question: How expensive would this card have to be not to break the game?
Stormify
Instant
Copy target spell for each spell cast before it this turn. You may choose new targets for the copies.
Oh whoops, I'll fix that.RRR would be fine. Fork is pretty bad card anyway, storm fork isn't that much better because it share the fundamental problem of having like 6+ mana to copy anything worth. This is assuming you can copy only istants or sorceries.
I feel the main issue is that different effects scale differently despite being at similar mana costs. For example, Lightning Bolt is 1 mana and being able to copy Lightning Bolt 6 times means death.I almost think this isn't printable - if it is it's at a completely stupid 6=7cc+ mana cost.
Yeah- it does horrific things in those instances- being able to go "ritual ritual ritual cantrip cantrip manamorphose bolt, stormify, kill you" is super dumb. That's why this thing seems unsafe at any CC to me.
I'm unreasonably excited to sleeve up my Piledrivers and play 10 minute matches that are crushing victory or crushing defeat.
I'm unreasonably excited to sleeve up my Piledrivers and play 10 minute matches that are crushing victory or crushing defeat.
When you summon creatures, do you only have to pay their mana costs once? Afterwards, anytime you want to attack, it's free.
Or is it you only have to pay when you attack, but you have to pay everytime you attack?
I'm used to Yu-Gi-Oh, where you sacrifice lower-tier monsters to summon a higher-tier monster, but you can use the higher-tier monster freely until it gets destroyed by enemy.
Edit: I'm reading the rule-book, and two rules don't make sense.
#1 - Creatures never attack other creatures. Wut.
#2 - If you are being attacked, you can use multiple creatures to block one enemy. Attacking player decides how much damage to inflict on each blocker. Double wut. So if the attacking creature is 8/8, can enemy make it attack every blocker with 8? Or must the user partition the 8 atk?
It looks like 30 on TCGPlayer.Yo wait what? When did Aether Vial go up to 40?
It looks like 30 on TCGPlayer.
Was it in the Merfolk deck that won the Euro GP?
When you summon creatures, do you only have to pay their mana costs once? Afterwards, anytime you want to attack, it's free.
Or is it you only have to pay when you attack, but you have to pay everytime you attack?
I'm used to Yu-Gi-Oh, where you sacrifice lower-tier monsters to summon a higher-tier monster, but you can use the higher-tier monster freely until it gets destroyed by enemy.
Edit: I'm reading the rule-book, and two rules don't make sense.
#1 - Creatures never attack other creatures. Wut.
#2 - If you are being attacked, you can use multiple creatures to block one enemy. Attacking player decides how much damage to inflict on each blocker. Double wut. So if the attacking creature is 8/8, can enemy make it attack every blocker with 8? Or must the user partition the 8 atk?
When you summon creatures, do you only have to pay their mana costs once? Afterwards, anytime you want to attack, it's free.
Or is it you only have to pay when you attack, but you have to pay everytime you attack?
I'm used to Yu-Gi-Oh, where you sacrifice lower-tier monsters to summon a higher-tier monster, but you can use the higher-tier monster freely until it gets destroyed by enemy.
Edit: I'm reading the rule-book, and two rules don't make sense.
#1 - Creatures never attack other creatures. Wut.
#2 - If you are being attacked, you can use multiple creatures to block one enemy. Attacking player decides how much damage to inflict on each blocker. Double wut. So if the attacking creature is 8/8, can enemy make it attack every blocker with 8? Or must the user partition the 8 atk?
I watched one episode of yu-gi-oh.
Just won a pretty big pptq with affinity. This deck is so good. Why isnt everybody playing this lol. I made some horrible mistakes but still crushed even supposedly bad matchups.
Yes, yes, and no. The defender determines which creatures block which attacking creatures. However then if two+ creatures block a single attacking creature the attacking player chooses how damage is divided between those two blockersThanks for the info, guys!
Lots of questions came up while playing and we were interpreting the rules on the fly (and quite liberally).
#1 - Is this correct? The attacker decides what cards to attack with. Blocker than decides what cards to block with. Attacker decides the order of who attacks what.
Yup#2 - Artifact Creatures count as artifacts? (i.e. ability, "when you control artifact...")
#3 - With artifact equipments, can you place them on the battlefield AND equip them in the same turn AND use them if you have enough land?
Thanks for the info, guys!
Lots of questions came up while playing and we were interpreting the rules on the fly (and quite liberally).
#1 - Is this correct? The attacker decides what cards to attack with. Blocker than decides what cards to block with. Attacker decides the order of who attacks what.
#2 - Artifact Creatures count as artifacts? (i.e. ability, "when you control artifact...")
#3 - With artifact equipments, can you place them on the battlefield AND equip them in the same turn AND use them if you have enough land?
Modern Masters 2015, Portal, Conspiracy, Dragon's Maze, Gatecrash, Betrayers of Kamigawa, Champions of Kamigawa, Dark Ascension, Eighth Edition, Legions, Magic 2012, Mirrodin Besieged, Ninth Edition, Odyssey, Saviors of Kamigawa, Scourge, Sixth Edition, Dragons of Tarkir