PhoncipleBone
Banned
http://www.slashfilm.com/new-the-wolverine-image-features-a-bone-claw-flashback/
So The Wolverine takes place after all the other X-Men films, but has some flashbacks. That's kind of odd.
Are those bone claws?
http://www.slashfilm.com/new-the-wolverine-image-features-a-bone-claw-flashback/
So The Wolverine takes place after all the other X-Men films, but has some flashbacks. That's kind of odd.
I reckon the "A" is actually the "Anarchist A", so it's a nice little ironic tattoo on the back of his neck to show that he stands against everything Cap represents.
That doesn't make a lot of sense for an Iron Man movie though. Especially since this was written to be a more personal story for Tony Stark, and they've repeatedly said that there won't be much direct connection to the Avengers compared to Iron Man 2.
The trailer for "Iron Man 3" was released online yesterday. And today we grabbed some screenshots from it to slow down all the action. One peculiar detail that was spotted was that The Mandarin (Ben Kingsley) has a tattoo on the back of his neck that resembles Captain America's shield.
The only difference is that the tattoo has an "A" at the center, instead of a star. Marvel head Kevin Feige recently stated that The Mandarin uses "symbolism of various cultures and iconography that he perverts for his own end."
Does this mean that The Mandarin is twisting the principles that the shield represents? And does the villain have a connection to Steve Rogers? It's not impossible that The Mandarin will resurface in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier" and "The Avengers 2?"
In the recently released "Iron Man 3" trailer, we got a look at The Mandarin, played by Ben Kingsley. The character is an international terrorist, who wears Ten Rings, which symbolize his terrorist organization that kidnapped Tony Stark in the first "Iron Man" film.
According to Marvel head Kevin Feige, in the third movie, The Mandarin will have a different backstory from the comics, in which he was a Chinese exile who discovers a crashed alien ship and harnesses the power of the 10 rings to unleash havoc on the world.
Feige explained that the rings won't create ice rays or fire beams, but they will definitely have a use. And despite the fact that "Iron Man 3" takes place after "The Avengers," there won't be an alien presence in the film of any kind.
Sequel for first class will be in the past isn't it?
Huh. That's really weird and the first I've heard of it. I guess that would explain the bone claws in the pic.So The Wolverine takes place after all the other X-Men films, but has some flashbacks. That's kind of odd.
Are those bone claws?
http://www.slashfilm.com/new-the-wolverine-image-features-a-bone-claw-flashback/
So The Wolverine takes place after all the other X-Men films, but has some flashbacks. That's kind of odd.
No question, the Marvel U just plays everything so safe. It almost seems sterile.Great, so they really are bringing The Mandarin down to a more realistic character to fit in with the previous Iron Man movies. Boring, hype deflated.
No question, the Marvel U just plays everything so safe. It almost seems sterile.
No question, the Marvel U just plays everything so safe. It almost seems sterile.
I was hoping that was the entire point of Thor and The Avengers, to allow those unrealistic things to exist in the entire film series. If The Mandarin has no powers whatsoever, I have very little interest in this movie.
I don't get why Marvel would be so okay with retconning one of their iconic supervillains for the movie when people accepted and embraced the Cosmic aspects of The Avengers.
I was hoping that was the entire point of Thor and The Avengers, to allow those unrealistic things to exist in the entire film series. If The Mandarin has no powers whatsoever, I have very little interest in this movie.
I don't get why Marvel would be so okay with retconning one of their iconic supervillains for the movie when people accepted and embraced the Cosmic aspects of The Avengers.
I wouldnt call Mandarin iconic. He isnt well known at all outside of diehard comic fandom.
With that said, I wouldnt mind if he was a magic guy. They are planning on introducing Dr. Strange afterall right?
But they havent said anything about him using magic. I am sure they could come up with a non magic explanation for his powers. Even in Thor they have him give that line about how science seems like magic to people tat dont know. It seems like they really dont want magic in these movies.
But they havent said anything about him using magic. I am sure they could come up with a non magic explanation for his powers. Even in Thor they have him give that line about how science seems like magic to people tat dont know. It seems like they really dont want magic in these movies.
Dr Strange, the User of Non-Specified Pseudoscientific Extradimensional Straight Up Non-Magic Powers Supreme.
But they havent said anything about him using magic. I am sure they could come up with a non magic explanation for his powers. Even in Thor they have him give that line about how science seems like magic to people tat dont know. It seems like they really dont want magic in these movies.
Iron Man being grounded? Even in the movies which are far more tame than the comics, the technology shown is absolutely ridiculous considering the time period. Stark's House is something you won't ever see even 10-15 years from now at the absolute earliest.
No question, the Marvel U just plays everything so safe. It almost seems sterile.
Iron Man being grounded? Even in the movies which are far more tame than the comics, the technology shown is absolutely ridiculous considering the time period. Stark's House is something you won't ever see even 10-15 years from now at the absolute earliest.
Iron Man being grounded? Even in the movies which are far more tame than the comics, the technology shown is absolutely ridiculous considering the time period. Stark's House is something you won't ever see even 10-15 years from now at the absolute earliest.
MCU seems safe now, but not so much back in 2008 when it began. It (Avengers) was a huge gamble.
What specifically are your referring to? Touch panels and voice activation for smart homes is already here. Now jarvis? Yes, that's years away
I'm talking about everything screen related being made up of PURELY glass with no wires connected to it at all.
And the holographic technology that he can interact with as if he were "touching" it.
And let's not get into Jarvis, who makes Siri look like it was designed by a College Programing major.
"Magic" in the MCU is just advanced and/or alien tech anyway. It's not literally supernatural.
Given the cinematic Marvel Universe had a working hovercar prototypes in 1942, Jarvis doesn't seem too crazy for a billionaire inventor.
Yeah, but it's sci-fi near-future tech. It's grounded in that one day you could imagine this in your home in real life. Once you start bringing aliens and magic in you've broken in to a different barrier. Some would say a different genre.Iron Man being grounded? Even in the movies which are far more tame than the comics, the technology shown is absolutely ridiculous considering the time period. Stark's House is something you won't ever see even 10-15 years from now at the absolute earliest.
Pretty much this.I think it's more a case of trying to differentiate the different movies as GuitarAtomik said. Iron Man is a more or less tech based franchise, Thor is fantasy, Captain America is more connected to the military/SHIELD. And yes, technology no matter how ridiculous almost always feels more realistic than magic.
Yeah I know. Don't remember where I read it or who said it but I remember reading an explanation that Asgardian magic isn't so much our technology advanced as it is just a completely different technology that would likely never make sense to a human. Except maybe Tony Stark or something. And yes that does fall into the alien technology territory but I kinda like the example.
I'm just talking about the Iron Man movies. Marvel is obviously not afraid of magic. Whether Dr Strange is or isn't in the next Thor, they have expressed that it's something they eventually want to do. They're just careful about when and where they'll use it, and stand alone Iron Man movies is where they'd rather not because they'd rather focus on the tech in that situation.The whole steering away from magic because it would turn audiences off is rubbish. The tesseract would have done that already if that was true.
Yep, probably from a flash back sequence.Are those bone claws?
Because honestly, what other Iron Man villain is there that isn't another guy in armor? You can still do interesting things with the Mandarin besides have him shoots laser blasts from his fists. Besides, I think it's too early to tell if Mandarin won't be able to go toe to toe with Iron Man. I just hope they don't put him in a suit lol.I just don't get why they'd use The Mandarin for the film if they were going to neuter him. It's actually very similar to what they did with Bane, they used the character but then changed his entire origin and background and turned him into a generic terrorist character. Why use the character if you're going to drastically change it?
probably Ultimate line, but in 616...the marvel universe has literally EVERYTHING, on all scales, different types of existences: Universe, Underverse, Mojoverse, Alt-Universe,Microverse, Alt-Dimensions, Limbo, Light Dimension, etc etc.
Different types of origins: Big Bang, Multiverse with central nexus, Omniverse, Oscillating Universe, Partially Eternal universes, finite universes..etc etc
and that diversity extends down to types of powers and characters/stories told. Even at the end of Fear Itself it was plainly clear that Odin had a fuck you card for Tony Stark when he restored all the people in france that were stoned by Grey Gargoyle. Asgardians dont have "tech" first of all its not even the Asgardians its the Vanir that would have the "tech" since its magic we are talking about.
Theres no reason to limit a comic book universe by saying something conceptual doesnt really exist , thats dumb its all about the stories that can be told within those universes no need for some kind of over arching worldview to govern it all.
Because honestly, what other Iron Man villain is there that isn't another guy in armor? You can still do interesting things with the Mandarin besides have him shoots laser blasts from his fists. Besides, I think it's too early to tell if Mandarin won't be able to go toe to toe with Iron Man. I just hope they don't put him in a suit lol.
I just don't get why they'd use The Mandarin for the film if they were going to neuter him. It's actually very similar to what they did with Bane, they used the character but then changed his entire origin and background and turned him into a generic terrorist character. Why use the character if you're going to drastically change it?
Not gonna lie, I was looking forward to the laser battles. But I guess we'll see. Just no more dudes in suits, I'm already worried that most of the fighting is gonna be done between Tony's new suit and the rest of his armory, taken over by The Mandarin or something. That would be extremely boring.
But they havent said anything about him using magic. I am sure they could come up with a non magic explanation for his powers. Even in Thor they have him give that line about how science seems like magic to people tat dont know. It seems like they really dont want magic in these movies.
Well the line was 'your ancestors called it magic, you call it science, I come from a world where they are one and the same'
It's a clever non-statement that means nothing. You're right that Marvel is scared of magic, but that doesn't mean that they wouldn't give Dr Strange a pseudo explanation that doesn't directly deny the presence of magic whilst making it sound less 'magicky'.
It's all just dressing, they wouldn't make a Dr Strange movie if they basically made him a more 'magical' Tony Stark fighting Aliens that resemble Satan.
Mandarin better have his trusty sidekick MODOK
Advanced Idea Mechanics is in the film. I expect a subtle hint (like Fin Fang Foom in Iron Man 2) and nothing else