Too many folks are sleeping on the Cap books and Black Panther.
I think all three will be classics by the end of their runs.
I agree with this.
Too many folks are sleeping on the Cap books and Black Panther.
I think all three will be classics by the end of their runs.
Too many folks are sleeping on the Cap books and Black Panther.
I think all three will be classics by the end of their runs.
I'm still trying to catch up on Sam Wilson's Cap via trades since I stopped reading after the Cap Wolf arc started (not that it was badly written in of itself...although the story was way too joke-y in the way it reintroduced Cap Wolf).
Does Champions spoil Vision #12 at all?
Does Champions spoil Vision #12 at all?
I don't read Vision, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't.
I don't read Vision
This is a terrible terrible mistake you've made with your life.
EDIT: Just read Champions and no it doesn't seem to spoil anything from Vision.
Does Champions spoil Vision #12 at all?
follow up question:
what the hell is wrong with you?
GO READ VISION
If you liked Cho in Champions you would likely enjoy his ongoing as well because Waid did a good job capturing Pak's interpretation of the character on the surface.I liked Champions a lot, but yeah, I can't get over the hit-and-miss with Ramos. Like, the cover art is gorgeous - I just wish the characters inside the book didn't look completely different from page to page.
It's my first exposure to ChoHulk and, huh, dude was a highlight. He was the only character I wasn't too sure about going in... though I'm a bit hesitant about how Viv is going to be handled outside by someone other than King, who gets the mix of "robotic pathos" just right.
Yea I enjoy Totally Awesome Hulk a lot more then I thought I would. As a curmudgeonly old man I usually don't like young hero focused books, but CHulk won me over.
I'd like Jane Thor more if Aaron would move on from this Roxxon/Malakith arc that he's been wallowing in since the end of the god bomb arc.
FFS move on already.
That is a fair complaint. The Roxxon arc has been going on since even before Jane became Thor!
The writer is a DC exclusive, and the artist is slated for another book. Soooooooooo, no.So that Blade book is never happening, is it?
So that Blade book is never happening, is it?
Coming early 2017
No creative team, but maybe Marvel is finally getting over its issues with LGBT representation?
Last year we also got 1 LGBT book. It was cancelled in 7 issues despite having better sales than books that got to survive 5+ issues more. The writer is now on 2 LGBT books over at DC.
No creative team, but maybe Marvel is finally getting over its issues with LGBT representation?
You post too quickly!
This is why I posted the gif.
Some of the LGBT comics critics on Twitter (Matt Santori-Griffith, Oliver Sava, Andrew Wheeler), who have criticized Marvel quite harshly (and fairly) about their lackluster LGBT representation, and with whom I usually agree about this sort of thing, are upset that there wasn't a creative team announced and are suggesting that this is only a reaction to DC announcing books like Batwoman.
Of course, it's best not to get too hyped with no creative team, but otherwise... so what? If Marvel finally feels that competitive and PR pressure is dictating that they have to launch more LGBT-centric books, how is that a bad thing?
Last year we also got 1 LGBT book. It was cancelled in 7 issues despite having better sales than books that got to survive 5+ issues more. The writer is now on 2 LGBT books over at DC.
You post too quickly!
Because it can mean many things.Some of the LGBT comics critics on Twitter (Matt Santori-Griffith, Oliver Sava, Andrew Wheeler), who have criticized Marvel quite harshly (and fairly) about their lackluster LGBT representation, and with whom I usually agree about this sort of thing, are upset that there wasn't a creative team announced and are suggesting that this is only a reaction to DC announcing books like Batwoman.
Of course, it's best not to get too hyped with no creative team, but otherwise... so what? If Marvel finally feels that competitive and PR pressure is dictating that they have to launch more LGBT-centric books, how is that a bad thing?
Nova sold barely better and was allowed to go on until now. Drax sold worse and got to 10+. Books that hadn't even been collected yet like Moon Girl and Hellcat are still ongoing. Angela didn't even get the chance to do well in book stores.This actually isn't true. Every book that sold similar or lower numbers got cancelled just as quick except for the all age books. The real issue was the fact that the second issue of Angela did 23k and we need to see a bigger push for a character like America who should do better.
They also got some criticism for getting a WOC professional writer to work on that second Black Panther book instead of one that's already in the comics industry.
Both of those books have been collected and appeal to a different audience so they seemingly get more leeway in addition to Moon Girl apparently doing well in trade.Nova sold barely better and was allowed to go on until now. Drax sold worse and got to 10+. Books that hadn't even been collected yet like Moon Girl and Hellcat are still ongoing. Angela didn't even get the chance to do well in book stores.
They also got some criticism for getting a WOC professional writer to work on that second Black Panther book instead of one that's already in the comics industry.
But when Roxanne Gay was attached to it, the blowback calmed.
We finally got some art for Richard Rider in Marvel NOW (2016).
The new Nova comic will be co-written by Jeff Loveness and Ramon Perez, with Ramon Perez doing the artwork.
Just as a heads up, Infamous Iron Man #1 spoils something pretty major about Civil War 2, so read at your own peril if for some bizarre reason you actually give a shit about Civil War 2.
Tony's dead, isn't he?
Dead, but he uploaded his personality to a computer, so he's acting as Doom's AI like Friday did for Stark.