Thirty7ven
Banned
I am.....
Oh you are, then please explain just how in the fuck you've reached the conclusion they don't understand what they are talking about.
I am.....
Nintendo right now.Poor Nintendo being cast aside and not allowed to be included in the debate with the "big brothers".
then please explain just how in the fuck you've reached the conclusion
Nintendo right now.
![]()
Asking some of the people in that thread to understand these definitions are being set for the judge's benefit (and to ensure that both the lawyers and the witnesses are on the same page regarding what's defined as being discussed), is like asking them to use their own brain.
They don't have one.
I take it you don't watch many court cases.I can see (hear) the FTC is out of their element when it comes to technology, lol.
Plenty of folks here are not warriors and game on multiple platforms.
bruh, 15 minute break already?
He is free to make an 80/20 deal with Bobby bear. I bet they would give them CoD Mobile on their literal last gen cell phone powered device.I bet that's true, Doug Bowser is rooting for Microsoft because he wants COD back on the Switch![]()
That was so bad by Phil. He straight away ignored the question and just repeated the line as the answer he wanted to give. Good stuff by the lawyer to circle back to the question he asked.Phil being pushed to agree that Xbox is more competitive with PS in US, tries to deflect, gets pushed again, admits.
Makes frustrating listening when they avoid even the most straight forward answers. They’re obviously paralysed by the fear of fucking this up but if your intentions are what you’ve said they are what have you got to be nervous about?Phil being pushed to agree that Xbox is more competitive with PS in US, tries to deflect, gets pushed again, admits.
Well, that forum is a dumpster fire. Nothing surprises me when it come to that shit hole.Asking some of the people in that thread to understand these definitions are being set for the judge's benefit (and to ensure that both the lawyers and the witnesses are on the same page regarding what's defined as being discussed), is like asking them to use their own brain.
They don't have one.
Sure...for now i haven't changed my mind as i said...for me more teraflops is better ..For reference
Makes frustrating listening when they avoid even the most straight forward answers. They’re obviously paralysed by the fear of fucking this up but if your intentions are what you’ve said they are what have you got to be nervous about?
You can game on one platform and still not be a warrior.
No wonder they're so sure MS is winning, they just don't understand what they're listening to.
Sorry you have such an issue with opinions. Until next time...cheers!So you got nothing?
A gif and that's it?
checks out
This is a forum of people who have never seen My Cousin Vinny. And that's a sad thing.It's funny how some of you think FTC doesn't know technology simply based on the question they are asking. They are asking the questions this certain way as the answers are for the Judge, not themselves. hahaha
he was on the ropesSounded like Phil was about to be caught in a lie and the Judge helped him out with a "break."
You think FTC/Sony won day 1? Are you crazy? Day 2 has been nothing but nonsense to try and paint Nintendo as not capable console to show that putting COD on there is useless . As for what fill just said bout the competitivness it simply was are you more competitive in 1 country over another. Yes.No wonder they're so sure MS is winning, they just don't understand what they're listening to.
His mindset is probably that of being interviewed for IGN, fanboy centered podcasts, and many of their other softball sponsored content Q&As.That was so bad by Phil. He straight away ignored the question and just repeated the line as the answer he wanted to give. Good stuff by the lawyer to circle back to the question he asked.
Sorry you have such an issue with opinions. Until next time...cheers!
You think FTC/Sony won day 1? Are you crazy? Day 2 has been nothing but nonsense to try and paint Nintendo as not capable console to show that putting COD on there is useless . As for what fill just said bout the competitivness it simply was are you more competitive in 1 country over another. Yes.
FTC/Sony
You think FTC/Sony won day 1? Are you crazy? Day 2 has been nothing but nonsense to try and paint Nintendo as not capable console to show that putting COD on there is useless . As for what fill just said bout the competitivness it simply was are you more competitive in 1 country over another. Yes.
Only if he responds to one of the mutants in that threadUntouchable about to get banned
That is MR. Fill to you.You think FTC/Sony won day 1? Are you crazy? Day 2 has been nothing but nonsense to try and paint Nintendo as not capable console to show that putting COD on there is useless . As for what fill just said bout the competitivness it simply was are you more competitive in 1 country over another. Yes.
But then she followed up with "Yes" to asking if it was needed for the nVidia deal. But of course the shills won't post the double speak.
You think FTC/Sony won day 1? Are you crazy? Day 2 has been nothing but nonsense to try and paint Nintendo as not capable console to show that putting COD on there is useless . As for what fill just said bout the competitivness it simply was are you more competitive in 1 country over another. Yes.
The shills masks are completely off and it's so easy to spot now.Brad Sams did the same thing yesterday on his video. You only talked about the part where Bond said no, but not the follow-up question. The follow-up question is why the FTC brought up that Windows license thing in the first place to show MS' hand.
Ah yes, the infamous, "It doesn't use Azure, it's just in the very same datacenter as our custom housing that was specifically built for... Azure."They asked Sarah Bond about Azure/cloud yesterday..
If that's a real issue, then they'll probably ask Phil questions about his previous statements about how the cloud is powered by azure severs.
The shills masks are completely off and it's so easy to spot now.
I mean are we not splitting hairs at this point when they’re using their existing cloud infrastructure anyway? Call it azure, call it brazzers, call it whatever you want.They asked Sarah Bond about Azure/cloud yesterday..
If that's a real issue, then they'll probably ask Phil questions about his previous statements about how the cloud is powered by azure severs.
This guys streaming it