DeepEnigma
Gold Member
One could argue the top companies in the world dictating and gobbling everything up is a form of corporate socialism. Fettered capitalism is the way.Who knew we could have pure socialism in 2023.
One could argue the top companies in the world dictating and gobbling everything up is a form of corporate socialism. Fettered capitalism is the way.Who knew we could have pure socialism in 2023.
I doubt they can afford that.
How can these companies continue to be hands tied for years? They're literally losing years of strategic planning.
Activision doesn't even know what is going to happen to COD's marketing partnership after the deal with Sony expires and they can't make other deals in the process.
That's not even considering that a CMA decision can't be appealed easily. It's not even a real appeal.
They can go to CAT but if they can't prove significant procedural mistakes or irrationality or foul play involved their request won't even be considered.
And in the remote case CAT agrees the whole thing just goes back to CMA, it can take an other year of investigations to get the same ruling.
In the meantime the breakup fees will reach what? A Bethseda acquisition size?
In summer they'll also have an other ordeal with the FTC.
They should just move on and execute on a different strategy.
If I’m in MS shoes I would honestly just pull out from the UK. The UK market is in the loss here. Just stop selling your games on the UK and let the CMA take the heat and hardcore gamers will import the games anyway. Appeal? C’mon just stop this stupid influence game as if they didn’t approve this deal after all the deals and contracts you made then they obviously wouldn’t. Seriously. Just skip the UK market.
How gross are these corpos, trying to instill fear that UK citizens are going to suffer because of this, give me a fucking break with these threats.
Neo Member post of the year. Love that spicy energy.Helps if they have actual studios that can do good games.
Agreed.As far as MSFT goes, they really only have three options:
The third option is what I want them to go for since I am against both MSFT and SONY gobbling up third-party studios and making them exclusive to their platform. The second option is the most realistic option though. I threw out the first option as it is possible for them to go that route, but that is highly unlikely.
- They can throw in the towel and move out of the hardware side of console gaming. With cloud being their big thing I don't think they would want to leave gaming entirely, especially not with the studios that they already have. Their existing studios could then be permanent third-party studios for other hardware and/or for cloud gaming.
- They can continue with their acquisition spree, but focus on smaller studios/publishers. To be clear, the only thing preventing Microsoft from obtaining this acquisition was the scale. None of the regulatory bodies batted an eye when it came to Zenimax. That was a huge acquisition, and it went through with ease. Activision Blizzard made Zenimax look tiny though, and that is what caused the scrutiny.
- The can pause their acquisitions and restructure to provide their existing publishers/studios with the necessary tools and leadership that they need to thrive, both separately and conjoined.
I truly do want Microsoft to succeed. They have IPs that I love, and they provide competition for Sony. Those are both great things. I just don't like HOW they are trying to succeed. I am also sad because I don't think they're ever going to port Lost Odyssey to PC.
People will buy the games for non-uk accounts and they will still sell the consoles. What are they losing physical games?Great idea, xbox already barely sells, just off their 2nd biggest market. Lol
Me, you, reddit, and gaf are still maybe less than 10% of the total potential market that would even bother to jump hoops to do thisPeople will buy the games for non-uk accounts and they will still sell the consoles. What are they losing physical games?
And the sale of the systems themselves. What will they play them on? Oh and Windows, which will usher in a Linux or iOS storm for productivity, something MS would not want. They don't need a powder keg challenging their OS monopoly. It would not be just Xbox that would have to pull out, but all of MS.People will buy the games for non-uk accounts and they will still sell the consoles. What are they losing physical games?
Yeah, but what are you gonna do when you deal with people who don't understand the field they are blocking? I am almost certain you could convince the CMA that Halo started as a TV show.
Now we have to continue to shell out for overpriced Sony hardware and super-expensive games from Sony and Nintendo.
Game Pass is the only gamer-first incentive since Valve made Steam, but now we are at the hands of people who are gonna try to squeeze every last drop out of their users. Nintendo sees its customers as super-fans who want to buy everything Nintendo, and Sony views their customers as game whales.
Not to mention all the shitty memes we now have to endure.
Now Microsoft can hopefully focus on using all of that money to make games... can they?
The deal obviously was never going to be approved. It is an influence game. MS already gave many assurances. The deal was approved already in many other markets as it is really a simple decision that the CMA really make it seem complicated but it is really not.Me, you, reddit, and gaf are still maybe less than 10% of the total potential market that would even bother to jump hoops to do this
As far as MSFT goes, they really only have three options:
The third option is what I want them to go for since I am against both MSFT and SONY gobbling up third-party studios and making them exclusive to their platform. The second option is the most realistic option though. I threw out the first option as it is possible for them to go that route, but that is highly unlikely.
- They can throw in the towel and move out of the hardware side of console gaming. With cloud being their big thing I don't think they would want to leave gaming entirely, especially not with the studios that they already have. Their existing studios could then be permanent third-party studios for other hardware and/or for cloud gaming.
- They can continue with their acquisition spree, but focus on smaller studios/publishers. To be clear, the only thing preventing Microsoft from obtaining this acquisition was the scale. None of the regulatory bodies batted an eye when it came to Zenimax. That was a huge acquisition, and it went through with ease. Activision Blizzard made Zenimax look tiny though, and that is what caused the scrutiny.
- The can pause their acquisitions and restructure to provide their existing publishers/studios with the necessary tools and leadership that they need to thrive, both separately and conjoined.
I truly do want Microsoft to succeed. They have IPs that I love, and they provide competition for Sony. Those are both great things. I just don't like HOW they are trying to succeed. I am also sad because I don't think they're ever going to port Lost Odyssey to PC.
If you knew how our monetary system worked you'd know we have socialism already, for the rich and those in charge.Who knew we could have pure socialism in 2023.
back in the day they even had some caught here on GAF as I recall?Astroturfing perhaps? At least some of the Xbox influencers look like they get paid by Microsoft. Visits to MS HQ, meeting with management etc. MS do have a history of astroturfing.
Why would they need to do that?Why couldn't Activision just sell off studios one at a time to the highest bidder or is that too simplistic?
The deal was even approved in markets that MS doesn't sell Xbox in, fancy that.The deal obviously was never going to be approved. It is an influence game. MS already gave many assurances. The deal was approved already in many other markets as it is really a simple decision that the CMA really make it seem complicated but it is really not.
I read the initial full report from the CMA and I can tell you straight away with absolute certainty that they understand this market better than you do.Yeah, but what are you gonna do when you deal with people who don't understand the field they are blocking? I am almost certain you could convince the CMA that Halo started as a TV show.
Now we have to continue to shell out for overpriced Sony hardware and super-expensive games from Sony and Nintendo.
Game Pass is the only gamer-first incentive since Valve made Steam, but now we are at the hands of people who are gonna try to squeeze every last drop out of their users. Nintendo sees its customers as super-fans who want to buy everything Nintendo, and Sony views their customers as game whales.
Not to mention all the shitty memes we now have to endure.
The worst part of this is while the FTC lost their case against Meta/Within, they actually gained something from the judge's ruling:In summer they'll also have an other ordeal with the FTC.
These are two surprisingly strong arrows in the FTC's bow against MSFT, and now they can incorporate the CMA's report to back them up.During the seven-day trial in December where the FTC challenged the deal because it allegedly put Meta in prime position to monopolize VR fitness apps, the company questioned how the acquisition of one app in a developing market could harm competition. U.S. District Judge Edward Davila approved the deal in a blow to the agency’s bid to dismantle the tech giant but advanced one of its key legal theories arguing that the purchase of competitors in budding markets can hurt competition. Additionally, he agreed with the FTC that mergers between companies that don’t currently compete against each other can violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which bars deals “whenever the effect would substantially lessen competition and tend to create a monopoly.”
Think if they had hold their hand... make starfield multiplat show some fake good-faith and spread the same bullshit "more games for everyone" and them after all is done let the hammer fall on the exclusives ... cant stop thinking that their handle of bethesda and the lies or half truths they told in that process contributed for this decisionThe own goals rapidly mount up.
And it all could have been avoided if these guys knew how to just shut the fuck up and actually focus 100% on their job which is to put out the best product(s) possible.
Imagine trying to PR and spend your way to dominance in an industry instead of simply providing the best products possible for your customers. Oh wait, no need to imagine, they already did that before. It's in their DNA.
I think selling off the studios to embrasser group, tencent and Saudi's is Microsoft’s best bet.
Well let's put it this way. I doubt Warcraft 3 Reforged would be released in the state it was in if Blizz was under Microsoft. And yeah your counter-argument obviously is gonna be Halo Infinite. Sure it was lackluster at launch but it wasn't a buggy mess iirc as WC3 Reforged. Not to mention WC3 Reforged might not have launched at all. Maybe wishful thinking?Please elaborate.
Yup.back in the day they even had some caught here on GAF as I recall?
It’s pretty hilarious. The U.K. still gets business from Microsoft and ABK either way. It’s one of the worlds largest gaming markets. Wanna test that ABK? See how much of a hit you take without releasing your games in the U.K.it's the stance Activision has chosen it seems
again another spicy last quote
Activision can do everything you said currently. They can bring it to Switch. They can bring it to Gamepass. They can bring it to Steam.Win win my ass. No day one on Gamepass, probably no xCloud, no Steam, no GeForce Now, no Switch.
Activision can do everything you said currently. They can bring it to Switch. They can bring it to Gamepass. They can bring it to Steam.
Microsoft was promising you things that they could do right now too. Why can't they bring it to Gamepass?
I honestly don't see that happening but I will wait and see if some of the upcoming releases buck the trend. For example, will Starfield have the traditional massive bug list and jank that bethesda is known for.Well let's put it this way. I doubt Warcraft 3 Reforged would be released in the state it was in if Blizz was under Microsoft. And yeah your counter-argument obviously is gonna be Halo Infinite. Sure it was lackluster at launch but it wasn't a buggy mess iirc as WC3 Reforged. Not to mention WC3 Reforged might not have launched at all. Maybe wishful thinking?
Nah definitely not for the best, imagine how much better games blizzard would make.
Such a great movie ...
What evidence have you seen so far that Microsoft would be a better steward? The Master Chief Collection, Microsoft's flagship games, was unplayable for 3 years. Like matchmaking literally didn't work for a year. I was so excited during the midnight release too...Well let's put it this way. I doubt Warcraft 3 Reforged would be released in the state it was in if Blizz was under Microsoft. And yeah your counter-argument obviously is gonna be Halo Infinite. Sure it was lackluster at launch but it wasn't a buggy mess iirc as WC3 Reforged. Not to mention WC3 Reforged might not have launched at all. Maybe wishful thinking?
None of those assurances were enough or in line with what the CMA requested.The deal obviously was never going to be approved. It is an influence game. MS already gave many assurances. The deal was approved already in many other markets as it is really a simple decision that the CMA really make it seem complicated but it is really not.
Why can't Microsoft make the best games? They have been in the business for well over 2 decades, 3 if you include their pc gaming. How is this crippling Microsofts ability to create great games? Are you suggesting that they have not figured out how yet?So we should cripple Microsoft's ability to expand their games portfolio while we give Sony time to sit there and build up their cloud gaming infrastructure so Sony can have the best games, the best cloud, and the best console. While Microsoft just closes the Xbox division. Yeah, makes sense.
Punish Microsoft for already having cloud infrastructure while giving Sony a chance to get it so Microsoft can never compete/use their advantage. I see now.
Win win my ass. No day one on Gamepass, probably no xCloud, no Steam, no GeForce Now, no Switch.
You have to look at their strongest regions. If Xbox doesn't have the UK then that severely reduces their numbers.
You just need to let Xbox know they can do better.
If you knew how our monetary system worked you'd know we have socialism already, for the rich and those in charge.
Also there's nothing capitalistic about a mega corporation who got big due to government intervention.
Hopefully this serves as a wake up call for them.
Phil Spencer has been making empty promises for a decade. Time for him invest in his studios and get some quality games out there.
2014:
2015:
2016:
2017:
2018:
2019:
2020:
2021:
2022:
2023:
All this promises and still no game of the year candidate.
Microsoft is by buying Activision/Blizzard. However UK doesn’t like competition especially since Sony is a big employer in UK.
Make no mistake this isn’t about cloud. This is about protecting Sony. Literally no major cloud provider is upset at MS acquisition.
I've been saying this since 2016, he's just been all about "hope" and never had anything to back it up. In 2015 he called it the best Xbox line up ever and I was like wtf! I thought it was PR but he ACTUALLY believed it.Hopefully this serves as a wake up call for them.
Phil Spencer has been making empty promises for a decade. Time for him invest in his studios and get some quality games out there.
2014:
2015:
2016:
2017:
2018:
2019:
2020:
2021:
2022:
2023:
All this promises and still no game of the year candidate.
Theoretically, sure.So is it over over? Or is there still tiny possibility that it can still happen?
Microsoft is by buying Activision/Blizzard. However UK doesn’t like competition especially since Sony is a big employer in UK.
Make no mistake this isn’t about cloud. This is about protecting Sony. Literally no major cloud provider is upset at MS acquisition.