We've seen a few double ko's. I wanna see a ko/sub. Then cut them both.
^ You could easily replace "Overeem" in that statement with the name "Barnett" aka GAFs favorite fighter all of a sudden.
Lavar Johnson's signed up with Bellator.
With him and Kongo, their HW division has risen from "crap" to "mediocre."
WW GOAT Matt Hughes x Carlos Newton comes to mind.
Bully Maynard and some dude on tuf had a draw due to double ko. Rob Emerson I think.Oh yeah i forgot about that one.
Bully Maynard and some dude on tuf had a draw due to double ko. Rob Emerson I think.
Probably because he was so adamant that he wasn't unconscious.For some reason I thought Gray won that. I remember Emerson tapping due to pain right after the slam and Gray getting the nod before they realized he was out.
For some reason I thought Gray won that. I remember Emerson tapping due to pain right after the slam and Gray getting the nod before they realized he was out.
Donald Cerrone vs. Evan Dunham @ UFC 167
I like.Donald Cerrone vs. Evan Dunham @ UFC 167
Donald Cerrone vs. Evan Dunham @ UFC 167
#TeamApathy
Good scrap.Donald Cerrone vs. Evan Dunham @ UFC 167
I like this fight. Rafael dos Anjos just took out both of these guys, so why not put them up against one another and see what happens?Donald Cerrone vs. Evan Dunham @ UFC 167
wouldn't it technically be 'team indifferent'?
same shit bro, #team synonym
I never looked at 167 as a stacked card myself, and I personally put much more stock in style matchups than I do name recognition.I mean, should we really be flipping our lids over a fight that will (I hope) find itself in the prelims of a 'stacked' 20th anniversary card, when that's where it belongs in the first place? It's as if expectations have been lowered to the point that we're surprised that Cowboy vs. Dunam is not the co-main. It's a shade over middling, and that's where it should both be placed on the card and received. They've earned midcard status.
UFC 167 is shaping up to be what should be expected of a pay-per-view. Every pay-per-view.
#TeamPositive is just happy recognizing all the names on the main card.
#TeamNegative looks at a card with names they don't recognize and says "who the fuck are these guys?". Then they look at a card with names they recognize and say they all suck.
No, #TeamNegative looks at a card with names they DO recognize and says "who the fuck are these guys?"#TeamNegative looks at a card with names they don't recognize and says "who the fuck are these guys?". Then they look at a card with names they recognize and say they all suck.
#teampositive is like a battered housewife living with an abusive alcoholic husband. at least you bastards don't pay for this shit.
So you're saying it's like Gr1m?
Compelling."CroCop is expected to go in a rematch with Alexander Emelianenko in October or November in Russia [56] and then he is expected to fight Satoshi Ishii in Japan on December 31, 2013.[57]"
...
I have literally no idea what to say about this.
Middleweight Alexander Shlemenko (c) vs. Brett Cooper
Middleweight Justin Torrey vs. Brennan Ward
Middleweight Jeremy Kimball vs. Perry Filkins
Middleweight Mikkel Parlo vs. Brian Rogers
Middleweight Jason Butcher vs. Giva Santana
Lightweight Derek Anderson vs. Patricky Freire
Preliminary Card (Spike.com)
Light Heavyweight Mike Mucitelli vs. Jeff Nader
Lightweight Andrew Calandrelli vs. Ryan Quinn
Featherweight Matt Bessette vs. Nick Piedmont
Featherweight Glenn Allaire vs. Rico DiSciullo
Heavyweight Josh Diekmann vs. Parker Porter
Fixed that up for you a bit."K-1 World GP 2013 Champion CroCop is expected to go in a rematch with Alexander Emelianenko in October or November in Russia [56] and then he is expected to fight Satoshi Ishii in Japan on December 31, 2013.[57]"
...
I have literally no idea what to say about this.
Bellator today, y'all.
Kizer, however, also was concerned when St-Pierre's reps asked questions about the list of substances the WADA program tests for, in addition to when the drug tests would be conducted and who would conduct them.
"They were asking, 'Well, what do you test for?' My answer is always the same: We test for prohibited substances as listed on the WADA list," Kizer said. "(They said), 'Well, what does that mean? Does that mean HGH, does that mean this, does that mean that?' Yes, it means it all. The answer then should have been, 'OK.'"
After more discussion, St-Pierre's rep, whom Kizer identified as the fighter's lawyer, Rodolphe Beaulieu, stood firm on using VADA.
"OK, fine, use VADA," Kizer said of his response. "That's not the question. The question is do you want to do outside testing through the athletic commission? And basically, they said we want to know all the tests you do so Georges' medical advisors can vet the test first before we decide.
"I said, 'I will take that as a no. We will let you know if we're going to do any testing on our own. Goodbye.'"
Kizer said Beaulieu then tried to backtrack by saying St-Pierre wasn't opposed to the WADA program.
"The guy actually had the gall this Rodolphe guy (to say), 'Well, no, that's not what we meant. We're happy to do it once we get this additional information, but I'm going to be done for the next seven days, and I'm unavailable via cell phone or email.' It's like, whatever dude. It was so ridiculous. But I don't hold any of that against Georges St-Pierre. As far as I know, he doesn't even know about these things."
Beaulieu couldn't be reached for comment. When asked whether St-Pierre turned down the WADA program, his longtime trainer, Firas Zahabi, wrote via text, "Sorry, I'm not up to date on the details."
Hendricks' camp: Reps for UFC champ St-Pierre refused NSAC-approved WADA testing
There's a bit more to it than that in the article, but I found this pretty interesting:
Fixed.I'm amazed by the smarminess of it all. Find the sketchy agency that doesn't test for the drug your guy is on, then spin it as the other fighter declining advanced drug testing when his camp refuses to allow Victor Conte & Associates to handle the testing. Wow.