• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

Lets put a few warheads on foreheads. Hit barracks, any logistic bases, and hammer any type of reserve training or reinforcement areas.

Lock these people in with the civilians and let them do as they see fit.

You can only be a good man until bad people will not allow it. Then you must become worse so future generations have the choice again.
 
Last edited:
Lets put a few warheads on foreheads. Hit barracks, any logistic bases, and hammer any type of reserve training or reinforcement areas.

Lock these people in with the civilians and let them do as they see fit.

You can only be a good man until bad people will not allow it. Then you must become worse so future generations have the choice again.
I think the US is skittish to start blowing up the army because its the Army thats gonna enforce and secure the country under a new regime. It's not like there is a big group waiting to flood in, it'll be a couple of guys with lines of credit. So after Iraq/Afghanistan where dismantling the existing government labor pool (aka the army) led to disaster, I think this time they are hoping for a (mostly peaceful) coup and later transfer of power to a pseudo-elected semi-secular person/group.
 
So the death toll could be as "low" as 1,850 and as high as 12,00-20,000 depending on the source . .
And Iraq might have had WMDs…

200.gif
 

Article:
China and Iran, along with Russia and North Korea, comprise an unofficial axis called "Crink" by some Western officials, nations brought together in part by a shared wish to push back against the U.S. China has helped Russia prop up its isolated economy and provide it with dual-use materials to build its military; Iran has supplied Russia with ammunition and helped it develop drones for use in the Ukraine war, where North Korea sent thousands of soldiers to fight alongside Moscow's.

After Israel and the U.S. launched strikes on Iran last year, the other Crink nations did little to come to Iran's aid. China remained concerned about exposing its banks and key companies to sanctions from the U.S. and Europe.

Beijing and Tehran signed a 25-year economic cooperation agreement in 2021 that called for China to invest $400 billion across Iran's economy in exchange for a steady supply of discounted oil. Iranian officials have urged China to do more to implement the deal, which has seen limited results amid continuing sanctions pressure.
[...]
But appeals from Iranian officials for more help from China have been met with scathing criticism on Chinese social media, Tuvia Gering, a China researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies in Israel, wrote in his newsletter Discourse Power on Monday.

He highlighted a post by Zhanhao, a popular nationalist-leaning account on WeChat, that sharply expressed such sentiment.

"Iran continues to expect China to take the bullet for it," the post read. "That's pure fantasy!"



Crink :lollipop-medical:
 


Article:
U.S. President Donald J. Trump speaking about potential intervention in Iran during an exclusive interview tonight with Tony Dokoupil of CBS News:

Dokoupil: "Well, now we're hearing that they're [Iran] going to start hanging protesters tomorrow. So it comes back to the question, have they crossed your red line or has the line moved?"

Trump: "I haven't heard about the hanging. If they hang them, you're going to see some things that - I don't know what your, where you come from and what your thought process is - but you'll perhaps be very happy."

Dokoupil: "What do you mean by that?"

Trump: "We will take very strong action. If they do such a thing, we will take very strong action."

Dokoupil: "And this strong action you're talking about, what's the end game?"

Trump: "The end game is to win. I like winning. And we're winning."

Dokoupil: "How do you define that in Iran?"

Trump: "Well, let's define it in Venezuela. Let's define it with al-Baghdadi. He was wiped out. Let's define it with Soleimani. And let's define it in Iran, where we wiped out their Iran nuclear threat in a period of about fifteen minutes once the B-2s got there. And that was a complete obliteration, as it turns out, which is what I said initially. Then some questioned it, and they said, you know, Trump was right. So we've been right about everything. We don't want to see what's happening in Iran happen. And, you know, if they want to have protests, that's one thing. When they start killing thousands of people, and now you're telling me about hanging, we'll see how that works out for them. It's not going to work out good."
 

Article:
China and Iran, along with Russia and North Korea, comprise an unofficial axis called "Crink" by some Western officials, nations brought together in part by a shared wish to push back against the U.S. China has helped Russia prop up its isolated economy and provide it with dual-use materials to build its military; Iran has supplied Russia with ammunition and helped it develop drones for use in the Ukraine war, where North Korea sent thousands of soldiers to fight alongside Moscow's.

After Israel and the U.S. launched strikes on Iran last year, the other Crink nations did little to come to Iran's aid. China remained concerned about exposing its banks and key companies to sanctions from the U.S. and Europe.

Beijing and Tehran signed a 25-year economic cooperation agreement in 2021 that called for China to invest $400 billion across Iran's economy in exchange for a steady supply of discounted oil. Iranian officials have urged China to do more to implement the deal, which has seen limited results amid continuing sanctions pressure.
[...]
But appeals from Iranian officials for more help from China have been met with scathing criticism on Chinese social media, Tuvia Gering, a China researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies in Israel, wrote in his newsletter Discourse Power on Monday.

He highlighted a post by Zhanhao, a popular nationalist-leaning account on WeChat, that sharply expressed such sentiment.

"Iran continues to expect China to take the bullet for it," the post read. "That's pure fantasy!"



Crink :lollipop-medical:

Oof we went from "Axis Powers" to "Axis of Evil" to Crink.

No more cool names for the bad guys I guess.
 
Yeah. The world isn't looking very multipolar right now, at any rate.
Well to be fair, the world multipolar only because USA is shackled by the international law and the "moral superiority". International law shackled USA from seizing tankers and dealing with the cartels, and the "moral superiority" prevents USA from actually solving problems and sometimes creates problems like "installing democracies", instead of talking about the.
 
"Then some questioned it, and they said, you know, Trump was right. So we've been right about everything."

😂

Ah, I wish that were true. But alas...that's not how the world works ( in either sense).

Yet if he's right about this, then that alone would already be worth congratulations from me.

Trump is talking a lot about Iran today, which is good, but it does raise expectations...so I sincerely wish that will be reflected in the news sooner rather than later.
 
Last edited:
The possibility of war is 30-50% it could become a major conflict
It wouldn't be a conflict. USA is just 50 years ahead of nearly everyone in military.

The Iraqis in 1991had one of the largest armies and amount of armour in the world and got beat in weeks.
These clown countries buy systems from places like Russia but don't know how to effectively use them.

If Iran had s300 and even some s400 surely they could score a single kill on a single Israeli jet. They were using f16s FFS.

If USA did some targeted strikes and Iran did some real retaliation. It would be over in a flash if the USA decided to escalate it.
 
It wouldn't be a conflict. USA is just 50 years ahead of nearly everyone in military.

The Iraqis in 1991had one of the largest armies and amount of armour in the world and got beat in weeks.
These clown countries buy systems from places like Russia but don't know how to effectively use them.

If Iran had s300 and even some s400 surely they could score a single kill on a single Israeli jet. They were using f16s FFS.

If USA did some targeted strikes and Iran did some real retaliation. It would be over in a flash if the USA decided to escalate it.
The crazy thing thing too about the US military destroying the opposition is that those overseas forces of soldiers, jets and warships are only a fraction of what they got. And they arent even doing crazy shit like nukes like during WWII. They are the invading army which SHOULD be the side getting picked apart before they succeed. Or they fail outright.

Just imagine how much faster it'd be if an invading force tried to attack continental USA. They wouldnt even make it across the oceans.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom